Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 271, 2021
2021 2nd International Academic Conference on Energy Conservation, Environmental Protection and Energy Science (ICEPE 2021)
Article Number 03061
Number of page(s) 5
Section Research on Energy Chemistry and Chemical Simulation Performance
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127103061
Published online 15 June 2021
  1. Wang, X.M., Chang, X., Ding, Y. et al. Translabial three-dimensional ultrasound investigation of the levator hiatus in postpartum women. J Med Ultrasonics 42, 373–378 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Mabrouk, M., Raimondo, D., Parisotto, M. et al. Pelvic floor dysfunction at transperineal ultrasound and voiding alteration in women with posterior deep endometriosis. Int Urogynecol J 30, 1527–1532 (2019). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Khatri, G., Kumar, N.M., Xi, Y. et al. Defecation versus pre-and post-defecation Valsalva maneuvers for dynamic MR assessment of pelvic floor dysfunction. Abdom Radiol (2019). [Google Scholar]
  4. Latif, M.A., Shady, M., Elawadly, N.M. et al. Role of three-dimensional ultrasound in females with obstructed defecation (in comparison with defecography). Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 51, 1 (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Torella, M., De Franciscis, P., Russo, C. et al. Stress urinary incontinence: usefulness of perineal ultrasound. Radiol med 119, 189–194 (2014). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bu, L., Yang, D., Nie, F. et al. Correlation of the type and degree of cystocele with stress urinary incontinence by transperineal ultrasound. J Med Ultrasonics 47, 123–130 (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chan, L., Tse, V.. Pelvic floor ultrasound in the diagnosis of sling complications. World J Urol 36, 753–759 (2018). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Taithongchai, A., Sultan, A.H., Wieczorek, P.A. et al. Clinical application of 2D and 3D pelvic floor ultrasound of mid-urethral slings and vaginal wall mesh. Int Urogynecol J 30, 1401–1411 (2019). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rostaminia, G., Peck, J.D., Quiroz, L.H. et al. How well can levator ani muscle morphology on 3D pelvic floor ultrasound predict the levator ani muscle function?. Int Urogynecol J 26, 257–262 (2015). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Thompson, J.A., O’Sullivan, P.B., Briffa, N.K. et al. Comparison of transperineal and transabdominal ultrasound in the assessment of voluntary pelvic floor muscle contractions and functional manoeuvres in continent and incontinent women. Int Urogynecol J 18, 779–786 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Aydin, S., Aydin, Q.A.. Evaluation of labor-related pelvic floor changes 3 months after delivery: a 3D transperineal ultrasound study. Int Urogynecol J 26, 1827–1833 (2015). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ikeda, M., Mori, A.. Vaginal palpation versus transabdominal ultrasound in the comprehension of pelvic floor muscle contraction after vaginal delivery: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Women's Health 21, 53 (2021). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Urbankova, I., Grohregin, K., Hanacek, J. et al. The effect of the first vaginal birth on pelvic floor anatomy and dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J 30, 1689–1696 (2019). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dietz H.P.. Pelvic floor ultrasound: a review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 202(4): 321–334 (2010) . [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.