Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 273, 2021
XIV International Scientific and Practical Conference “State and Prospects for the Development of Agribusiness - INTERAGROMASH 2021”
Article Number 08019
Number of page(s) 9
Section Agricultural Management and Environmental Economics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127308019
Published online 22 June 2021
  1. R. Paut, R. Sabatier, M. Tchamitchian, Reducing risk through crop diversification: an application of portfolio theory to diversified horticultural systems Agric. Syst. 168, 123–130 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  2. H.C. Norman, D.G. Masters, E.G. Barrett-Lennard, Halophytes as forages in saline landscapes: interactions between plant genotype and their environment change their feeding value to ruminants J. Exp. Environ. Bot. 92, 96–109 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  3. L. Ruiz-Garcia, L. Lunadei, The role of rfid in agriculture: Applications, limitations and challenges Comput. Electron. Agric. 79(1), 42–50 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  4. E. Poyatos-Racionero, J.V. Ros-Lis, J.-L. Vivancos, R. Martínez-Máñez, Recent advances on intelligent packaging as tools to reduce food waste J. Cleaner Prod. 172, 3398–3409 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Newsome, C.G. Balestrini, M.D. Baum, J. Corby, W. Fisher, K. Goodburn, T.P. Labuza, G. Prince, H.S. Thesmar, F. Yiannas, Applications and perceptions of date labeling of food Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 13(4), 745–769 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  6. L. Karabarbounis, B. Neiman, The global decline of the labor share Q. J. Econ. 129(1), 61–103 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  7. E.K. Owusu, A.P. Chan, M. Shan, Causal factors of corruption in construction project management: an overview Sci. Eng. Ethics 1–31 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  8. G. Locatelli, G. Mariani, T. Sainati, M. Greco, Corruption in public projects and megaprojects: There is an elephant in the room! Int. J. Proj. Manag. 35(3), 252–268 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  9. P.E. Eriksson, M. Westerberg, Effects of cooperative procurement procedures on construction project performance: a conceptual framework Int. J. Proj. Manag. 29(2), 197–208 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  10. E.E. Ameyaw, A.P. Chan, D.G. Owusu-Manu, E. Coleman A fuzzy model for evaluating risk impacts on variability between contract sum and final account in government-funded construction projects J. Facil. Manag. 13(1), 45–69 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  11. E.E. Ameyaw, A.P. Chan, A fuzzy approach for the allocation of risks in public–private partnership water-infrastructure projects in developing countries J. Infrastruct. Syst. 22(3) (2016) [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Shan, B.G. Hwang, K.S.N. Wong, A preliminary investigation of underground residential buildings: advantages, disadvantages, and critical risks Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 70, 19–29 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Shan, A.P. Chan, Y. Le, Y. Hu Investigating the effectiveness of response strategies for vulnerabilities to corruption in the Chinese public construction sector Sci. Eng. Ethics 21(3), 683–705 (2015) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. M.R. Hosseini, I. Martek, S. Banihashemi, A.P. Chan, A. Darko, M. Tahmasebi, Distinguishing characteristics of corruption risks in Iranian construction projects: a weighted correlation network analysis Sci. Eng. Ethics, 1–27 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  15. F.L. Greitzer, L.J. Kangas, C.F. Noonan, C.R. Brown, T. Ferryman Psychosocial modeling of insider threat risk based on behavioral and word use analysis e Serv. J. 9(1), 106–138 (2013) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.