Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 273, 2021
XIV International Scientific and Practical Conference “State and Prospects for the Development of Agribusiness - INTERAGROMASH 2021”
Article Number 08037
Number of page(s) 7
Section Agricultural Management and Environmental Economics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127308037
Published online 22 June 2021
  1. V. A. Bardanov, Quality and life, 4, 3–7 (2018) https://ql-journal.ru/articles/ru/2018/4/4_2018_sait_3-7.pdf [Google Scholar]
  2. V. E. Kovlyakova, Compttency, 2, 12–23 (2020) doi: 10.24411/1993-8780-2020-1-0203 [Google Scholar]
  3. RF Ministry of Economic Development Order of 30.05.2014 N 326 On approval of the Accreditation Criteria, the list of documents confirming compliance of the applicant, the accredited person with the accreditation criteria, and the list of documents in the fieldof standardization, compliance with the requirements of which by applicants, accredited persons ensures their compliance with the accreditation criteria (as amended RF Ministry of Economic Development Order of 19.08.2019 N 506); https://fsa.gov.ru/documents/9557/25.01.2021 [Google Scholar]
  4. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 31000. Risk Management - Guidelines, ISO, 2nd ed., Geneva, Switzerland. (2018) https://iso-management.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/ISO-31000-2018.pdf [Google Scholar]
  5. State Standard ISO/IEC 17025 “General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories » http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200166732 [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Filyppova, I. Bashynska, B. Kholod, L. Prodanova, L. Ivanchenkova, and V. Ivanchenkov, International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(3), 6047–6052 (2019) doi: 10.35940/ijrte.C5601.098319 https://www.ijrte.org/wp-content/uploads/papers/v8i3/C5601098319.pdf [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Vasilňáková Proceedings of the 29th International DAAAM Symposium, 1071–1075 (2018) doi: 10.2507/29th.daaam.proceedings.153 [Google Scholar]
  8. State Standard P 51901.12˗2007 “Risk management. Procedure for failure mode and effects analysis” http://docs.cntd.ru/document/gost-r-51901-12-2007 [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Wong, Accreditation and Quality Assurance, 22(2), 103–108 (2017) doi: 10.1007/s00769-017-1256-x. [Google Scholar]
  10. R. D. Eliza, D. Minodora, Acta Medic Marisiensis, 61(4), 372–377, (2015) doi: 10.1515/amma-2015-0086 [Google Scholar]
  11. B. Runje, A. Horvatic Novak, A. Razumic, P. Piljek, B. Strbac, M Orosnjak, Proceedings of the 30th DAAAM International Symposium, 0054–0058 (2019) doi : 10.2507/30th.daaam.proceedings.007 [Google Scholar]
  12. M.M. Kharlamov, T.S. Kolmykova, E.S. Nesenyuk, T.O. Tolstykh, E.P. Garina, Lecture notes in networks and systems, 91, 654˗662 (2020) doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-32015-7_73 [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Yazdi, S. Kabir, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 26(1), 57˗86 (2018) doi: 10.1080/10807039.2018.1493679 [Google Scholar]
  14. I. Nurutdinova, L. Dimitrovа, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 875, 379˗388 (2019) doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01821-4_40 [Google Scholar]
  15. R. S. Kaplan, H.B. Leonard, A. Mikes, Novel Risks Working paper of Harvard Business School 20-094 (1-26) (2020) https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/20-094_e296e463-5262-41e4-a4ac-fb6d9516e589.pdf [Google Scholar]
  16. L.V. Borisova, V.P. Dimitrov, Mordovia university bulletin, 27(2), 181˗193 (2017) doi: 10.15507/0236-2910.027.201702.178-189 [Google Scholar]
  17. L. Borisova, V. Dimitrov, I. Nurutdinova, Proceedings of IEEE East˗West Design and Test Symposium (EWDTS’2017), 319˗322 (2017) doi: 10.1109/EWDTS.2017.8110107 [Google Scholar]
  18. L.V. Borisova, I.N. Nurutdinova, V.P. Dimitrov, Don State Technical University Bulletin, 17(1), 113˗121 (2017) doi: https://doi.org/10.23947/1992-5980-2017-17-1-113-121 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.