Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 273, 2021
XIV International Scientific and Practical Conference “State and Prospects for the Development of Agribusiness - INTERAGROMASH 2021”
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 11045 | |
| Number of page(s) | 9 | |
| Section | Semantics of Sustainability | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127311045 | |
| Published online | 22 June 2021 | |
- A. Goatly, Language in Use, 157–167 (2020) doi:10.4324/9781003060994-15 [Google Scholar]
- R.W. Gibbs, Discourse Processes 48(8), 529–562 (2011) doi:10.1080/0163853X.2011.606103 [Google Scholar]
- M. Turner, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science, 1–3 (2016) doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3328-1 [Google Scholar]
- G. Fauconnier, M. Turner, Polysemy and conceptual blending, Polysemy, 79–94 (2011) doi:10.1515/9783110895698.79 [Google Scholar]
- G. Steen, Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9(1), 26–64 (2011) doi:10.1075/rcl.9.1.03ste [Google Scholar]
- Z. Kövecses, Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18(1), 112–130 (2020) doi:10.1075/rcl.00053.kov [Google Scholar]
- R. Trim, Metaphor and the Historical Evolution of Conceptual Mapping (Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY, 2011) [Google Scholar]
- Fan, Procedia Computer Science 131, 925–928 (2018) doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.04.224 [Google Scholar]
- M. Benedek, R. Beaty, E. Jauk et al., NeuroImage 90, 99–106 (2014) doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.046 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- R. Bottini, Ch.F. Doeller, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 24, 606–619 (2020) doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.05.008 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- M. Prandi, Metaphor and Symbol 27(2), 148–170 (2012) doi:10.1080/10926488.2012.667690 [Google Scholar]
- G. Lakoff, M. Johnson, Metaphors We Live By (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2008) [Google Scholar]
- V.F. Novodranova, Cognitive Studies of Language 9, 136−139 (2011) [Google Scholar]
- R.W. Gibbs, Journal of Pragmatics 90, 73–76 (2015) doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.016 [Google Scholar]
- G. Steen, Cognitive Semiotics 5, 179–197 (2013) doi:10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.179 [Google Scholar]
- L. Wee, Discourse Studies 7(3), 63–384 (2005) doi:10.1177/1461445605052191 [Google Scholar]
- T.B. Mikheeva, E.V. Murugova, SHS Web of Conf (2019) doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20197007003 [Google Scholar]
- S.V. Pervukhina, O.A. Evtouchenko, L.Iu. Kotliarenko, M.P. Churikov, SHS Web of Conferences. Curr. Iss. Mod. Ling. Hum., 232–244 (2020) doi: 10.1051/shsconf/20208801013 [Google Scholar]
- E.V. Murugova, EpSBS, 416–425 (2018) doi:10.15405/epsbs.2018.04.02.59 [Google Scholar]
- S. Pervukhina, V. Demchenko E3S Web of Conf. (ITSE 2020) 18033 (2020) doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202021018033 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- M. Zobel, H. Chatterjee, G. Matveeva, U. Kolb, R.B. Neder, Jour. Nanoparticle Res., 1–5 (2015) doi:10.1007/s11051-015-3006-5 [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.