EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 274 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 274 (2021) 01005 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 274, 2021
2nd International Scientific Conference on Socio-Technical Construction and Civil Engineering (STCCE – 2021)
Article Number 01005
Number of page(s) 8
Section Architecture and Planning
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127401005
Published online 18 June 2021
  1. T. Buffel, F. De Backer, J. Peeters, C. Phillipson, V. Romero Reina, A. Kindekens, L. De Donder, K. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 116, 1785–1791 (2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.472 [Google Scholar]
  2. S. Zhong, C. Lee, M.J. Foster, J. Bian. Soc. Sci., Med. 264, 113374 (2020) DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113374 [Google Scholar]
  3. N. Vecchio, T. Comans, P. Harris, V. Graham, A. Cully, N. Harris, J. Fitzgerald, J. Cartmel, X. Golenko, K. Radford, J. Intergener. Relatsh., 9, 1–20 (2020) DOI: 10.1080/15350770.2020.1810194 [Google Scholar]
  4. L. Nanu, F. Ali, K. Berezina, C. Cobanoglu, Int. J. Hosp. Manag., 89, 102530 (2020) DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102530 [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Upadhyaya, C.P. Blocker, H.R. Houston, M.R. Sims. J. Bus. Res. 125, 324–335 (2021) DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.019 [Google Scholar]
  6. C. Giraudeau, N. Bailly, Eur. J. Ageing, 16, 363–376 (2019) DOI: 10.1007/s10433-018-00497-4 [Google Scholar]
  7. R. Peters et al. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr., 94, 104356 (2021) DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2021.104356 [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Kaplan, J. Haider, U. Cohen, D. Turner, J. Intergener. Relatsh., 5, 81–110 (2007) DOI: 10.1300/J194v05n02_06 [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Garcia, P. Marti. ARQ, 86, 62–69 (2014) DOI: 10.4067/S0717-69962014000100009 [Google Scholar]
  10. L. G. Lebedeva, L. V. Orlova, IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 603, 042062 (2019) DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/603/4/042062 [Google Scholar]
  11. T. E. Epimakhova, Designing for Multigenerational Community: Creating a Supportive Environment for Young and Old in the U.S.A., in Proceedings of the Clemson University, Clemson, U.S.A., 128 (2016) URL: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/268647129.pdf (last accessed: 25.03.2021) [Google Scholar]
  12. E. Galand, A Multi-generational community, in Proceedings of the Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland, 56 (2017) URL: https://trepo.tuni.fi/handle/123456789/25113 [Google Scholar]
  13. D. J. Miller, Intergenerational Housing: vernacular perspective, in Proceedings of the Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, U.S.A., 133 (2014) URL: https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/catalog/21811 (last accessed: 25.03.2021) [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Seo, Therapeutic and Developmental Design: The Relationship Between Spatial Enclosure and Impaired Elder-Child Social Interaction, in Proceedings of the Texas A&M University, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, U.S.A., 331 (2006) URL: https://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/handle/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1730 [Google Scholar]
  15. N. Norouzi, S. Jarrott, H. Chaudhury. J. Archit. Plann. Res., 36, 35–51 (2019) URL: https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85084819264&origin=resultslist&zone=contextBox [Google Scholar]
  16. S. E. Jarrott, A. J. Stremmel, J. J. Naar. J. Intergener. Relatsh., 17, 488–504 (2019) DOI: 10.1080/15350770.2019.1579154 [Google Scholar]
  17. R. Vanderbeck, N. Worth, Intergenerational Space, in Proceedings of the Routledge, London, England 342 (2015) DOI: 10.4324/9780203736920 [Google Scholar]
  18. C.-R. Delgado-Acosta, C.-G. Calero-Martin, H. Gonzalez-Bencomo. Documents d'Analisi Geografica, 62, 5–25 (2016) DOI: 10.5565/rev/dag.253 [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Reyes, Intergenerational Interactions: Designing for the Young & Old, in Proceedings of the University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, U.S.A., 147 (2016) URL: https://ufdc.ufl.edu/IR00007999/00001 (last accessed: 25.03.2021) [Google Scholar]
  20. B. J. Hake. J. Intergener, Relatsh, 15, 26–38 (2017) DOI: 10.1080/15350770.2017.1260369 [Google Scholar]
  21. M. L. Predny, D. Relf. Hort Technology, 10, 64–70 (2000) DOI: 10.21273/HORTTECH.10.1.64 [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Li, J. Li, Procedia Engineering, 198, 790–801 (2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.130 [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Ozdemir, Cities, 93, 206–214 (2019) DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.005 [Google Scholar]
  24. X. Wang, H. Woolley, Y. Tang, H. Liu, Y. Luo, Cities, 72, 173–180 (2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.011 [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Afifi, B. Parke, M. Al-Hussein, Autom. Constr., 39, 117–125 (2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2013.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  26. X. Ma, Y. Tian, M. Du, B. Hong, B. Lin, Sci. Total Environ, 768, 1–13 (2021) DOI: 10.1016/j. scitotenv.2021.144985 [Google Scholar]
  27. S. Song, D. Wang, W. Zhu, C. Wang, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 152, 119–859 (2020) DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119859 [Google Scholar]
  28. P. Brownell, R.P. Resnick, J. Intergener, Relatsh, 3, 67–75 (2005) DOI: 10.1300/J194v03n01_06 [Google Scholar]
  29. A. Androsov, A. Kopeva, O. Maslovskai, The New Ideas of New Century: 17th Int. Sci. Conf. Proc. 2, 12–17 (2017) URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28995707 (last accessed: 25.03.2021) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.