EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 274 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 274 (2021) 01017 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 274, 2021
2nd International Scientific Conference on Socio-Technical Construction and Civil Engineering (STCCE – 2021)
Article Number 01017
Number of page(s) 13
Section Architecture and Planning
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127401017
Published online 18 June 2021
  1. Local identity as a new economy. Heritage, Project Russia. URL: https://prorus.ru/interviews/lokalnaya-identichnost-kak-novaya-ehkonomika-nasledie/ (reference date 03.25.2021). [Google Scholar]
  2. S. Treija, U. Bratuskins, S. Barvika, E. Bondars. The liveability of historical cities: Current state and prospects for habitation, WIT Transactions on the Built Environment 193, 15–26 (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. K. Lynch Image of the city. URL: http://www.glazychev.ru/books/translations/Linch/Linch_1.htm (reference date 03.25.2021). [Google Scholar]
  4. N.S. Diaghileva. Theoretical aspects of urban identity, Branding of small and mediumsized cities in Russia: experience, problems, prospects 11, 54–59 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  5. E. Erickson Identity: Youth and Crisis (1996). [Google Scholar]
  6. M.V. Yakovleva. Features of the sociological analysis of urban symbolism as a factor in the formation of the identity of citizens, Bulletin of the Udmurt University 1, 83–90 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  7. Y. Yoshimura, S. He, G. Hack et al. Quantifying Memories: Mapping Urban Perception, Mobile NetwAppl 25, 1275–1286 (2020). DOI: 10.1007/s11036-020-01536-0. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Holl, J. Pallasmaa, A. Perez-Gomez. Questions of Perception, Phenomenology of Architecture, 155 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  9. S.V. Melnikova. Analysis of the categories identity, image, image, brand in relation to the city, Improvement of humanitarian technologies in the educational space of the university: factors, problems, prospects : materials of the International Scientific and Methodological Seminar, Yekaterinburg, March 18, 2015, Yekaterinburg, 215–222 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Chatzitoulousis, V. Vlasidis, A. Sarris, K. Efkleidou, E. Kotjabopoulou, N. Papadopoulos, N. Argyriou, J. Donati, M. Manataki, P. Trapero-Fernandez. Records and Transformations of Memories in the Cultural Landscape of Idomeni (Kilkis, Northern Greece), Open Archaeology 5 (1), 563–585 (2019). DOI: 10.1515/opar-2019-0035. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. R.M. Schafer. The Soundscape: Our Sonic Environment and the Tuning of the World. Rochester (VT): Destiny Books, 320 (1994). [Google Scholar]
  12. K.S. Mayorova, Urban sound studies: New Horizons for Urban Studies, Urban Studies and Practices 4, 11–19 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Jaszczak, E. Pochodyla, K. Kristianova, N. Malkowska, J.K. Kazak. Redefinition of Park Design Criteria as a Result of Analysis of Well-Being and Soundscape: The Case Study of the Kortowo Park (Poland), Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, 2972 (2021). DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18062972. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Shchenkov, N. Antonova. Architectural heritage and identity of Russian cities, Project Baikal 65, 27–31 (2021). DOI: 10.51461/PROJECTBAIKAL.65.1670. [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Jaszczak, K. Kristianova, E. Pochodyla, J.K. Kazak, K. Mlynarczyk. Revitalization of Public Spaces in Cittaslow Towns: Recent Urban Redevelopment in Central Europe, Sustainability 13, 2564 (2021). DOI: 10.3390/su13052564. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. G. Roy. Authenticity v/s glocalization as represented in the digital platforms: A study on the food culture with special reference to tripura, Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities 12 (5), (2021). DOI: 10.21659/rupkatha.v12n5.rioc1s17n7. [Google Scholar]
  17. D. Jakob. The eventification of place: Urban development and experience consumption in Berlin and New York City, European Urban and Regional Studies 20 (4), 447–459 (2013). DOI: 10.1177/0969776412459860. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. R. Janiskee. South Carolina’s harvest festival: Rural delights for day tripping urbanites, Journal of Cultural Geography 1, (1980). [Google Scholar]
  19. S.D. Vita. The regional scale of contemporary mega-events The Milan Expo 2015, the post-event and the challenges for public policies and spatial planning, Mega-Events: Placemaking, Regeneration and City-Regional Development 5, 70–86 (2019). DOI: 10.4324/9780429466595-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Roche. Festivalization, cosmopolitanism and european culture: On the sociocultural significance of mega-events, Festivals and the Cultural Public Sphere, 124–141 (2011). DOI: 10.4324/9780203818787. [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Everett, D. John Parakoottathil. Transformation, meaning-making and identity creation through folklore tourism: the case of the Robin Hood Festival, Journal of Heritage Tourism 13 (1), 30–45 (2018). DOI: 10.1080/1743873X.2016.1251443. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. A.G. Sabiescu. Living Archives and The Social Transmission of Memory Curator 63 (4), 497–510 (2020). DOI: 10.1111/cura.12384. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. C. Suau. Reactivating urban voids through sensory and pop-up design: Changing citizen perceptions of remaking with waste, Handbook of Research on Perception-Driven Approaches to Urban Assessment and Design, 534–558 (2018). DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-3637-6.ch023. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. R. Luck. Inclusive design and making in practice: Bringing bodily experience into closer contact with making, Design Studies 54, 96–119 (2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.destud. 2017.11.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. R. Luck. Participatory design in architectural practice: Changing practices in future making in uncertain times, Design Studies 59, 139–157 (2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.destud. 2018.10.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. R. Luck. What is it that makes participation in design participatory design?, Design Studies 59, 1–8 (2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2018.10.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. P.V. Kapustin, A.I. Gavrilov. Problems of Analysis of Design and Research Methods of Interaction with the Urban Environment, Scientific Journal of Construction and Architecture 3 (59), 99–110 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  28. I. Mulder. Co-creative partnerships as catalysts for social change, Strategic Design Research Journal 11 (3), 178–185 (2018). DOI: 10.4013/sdrj.2018.113.01. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. K. Careva, R. Lisac, T. Pletenac, J. Vukic. City acupuncture as a participatory tool in revitalizing public space, Prostor 25 (2), 190–199 (2017). DOI: 10.31522/p.25.2(54).2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. V. Kazakova. «Town of all trades» in Shilka: Creation of a comfortable environment, Project Baikal 65, 74–79 (2021). DOI: 10.51461/projectbaikal.65.1680. [Google Scholar]
  31. CO-Create Charoenkrung. URL: https://archello.com/project/co-create-charoenkrung-2 (reference date 03.25.2021). [Google Scholar]
  32. L.H. Lofland. The Public Realm. New York: Aldine De Gruyter, (1998). [Google Scholar]
  33. A.L. Gelfond. Architecture of public spaces: monograph. M.: INFRA-M, 412 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  34. L. Grundlingh. The great outdoor living room of the city: A survey essay on the thoughts and aims of urban park development in the late 19th and early 20th century in Europe and the United States of America, Tydskrif vir Geesteswetenskappe 57 (2), 542–561 (2017). DOI: 10.17159/2224-7912/2017/v57n2-2a4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. A>kcko6c. Death and Life of Large American Cities Moscow: New Publishing House, 460 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  36. What is the city talking about? How to make dialogue the basis of urban development. Recordings of lectures World Urban Parks Congress. URL: https://youtu.be/yJZyBoGTyYw/ (reference date 03.25.2021). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.