Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 274, 2021
2nd International Scientific Conference on Socio-Technical Construction and Civil Engineering (STCCE – 2021)
Article Number 03025
Number of page(s) 7
Section Building Constructions, Buildings and Structures
Published online 18 June 2021
  1. K. Terzaghi. Erdbaumechanik auf Bodenphysikalischer Grundlage. Deuticke, Vienna, 399 (1925). [Google Scholar]
  2. H.B. Seed. Soli liquefaction and cyclic mobility evaluation for level ground during earthquakes. Journal of ASCE, 105 T2, (1996). [Google Scholar]
  3. K. Ishihara. Soil Behaviour in Earthquake Geotechnics. Saint-Petersburg, 379 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  4. L.R. Stavnitzer. Seismic resistance of bases and foundations. Publishers ASV, Moscow, 448 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  5. E.A. Voznesensky. The behavior of soils under dynamic loads. Publishers MSU, Moscow, 288 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  6. V.A. Ilyichev, R.A. Mangushev. Directory geotechnics, Bases, foundations and underground structures. M.: ASV, 728 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  7. V.A. Ilyichev et al. Technological Soil Mechanics in Underground. Construction IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 1079 042056 (2021). DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/1079/4/042056. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. V.P. Petrukhin. Geotechnical problems of construction in Moscow - the largest metropolis of Russia. Proceedings of the international. Conference - Geotechnical problems of megacities, GEOMOS2010, 2010, Moscow, Russia (2010). [Google Scholar]
  9. R. Katzenbach et al. Soil-structure-interaction of Tunnels and Superstructures During Construction and Service Time, J. Procedia Engineering 57, (2013). DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.007. [Google Scholar]
  10. H. Karoui, M. Bouassida. Assessment of observed of behavior of Sidi El Barrak Dam, J. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions 1 (1), (Tunisia) (2016). DOI: 10.1007/s41062-016-0044-5. [Google Scholar]
  11. T.-L. Gouw, A. Gunawan. Vibrocompaction proposed design guideline for practicing engineers, Proceedings of the 16th Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, ARC 2019, 2-5 Sept 2019, Taipei, Taiwan (2019). [Google Scholar]
  12. Ilizar T. Mirsayapov, N.N. Aysin. Influence of a deep construction pit on a technical condition of surrounding buildings, Proceedings of the International Conference on Geotechnics Fundamentals and Applications in Construction: New Materials, Structures, Technologies and Calculations, St.-Petersburg, Russia (2019). DOI: 10.1201/9780429058882-38. [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Lombardi, S. Bhattacharya, M. Hyodo, T. Kaneko. Undrained behaviour of two silica sands and practical im-plications for modelling SSI in liquefiable soils, J. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng. 66 (2014). DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.07.010. [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Bhattacharya et al. Liquefaction of soil in the Tokyo bay area from the 2011 Tohoku (Japan) earthquake, J. Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 31 (11), (2011). DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.06.006. [Google Scholar]
  15. K. Goda, G. Campbell, L. Hulme, B. Ismael, L. Ke, R. Marsh, et al. The 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes: cascading geological hazards and compounding risks, Front Built Environ 2 (19), (2016). DOI: 10.17863/CAM.7462. [Google Scholar]
  16. G. Chiaro, T. Kiyota, R.M. Pokhrel, K. Goda, T. Katagiri, K. Sharma. Reconnaissance report on geotechnical and structural damage caused by the 2015 Gorkha Earthquake, Nepal Soils Found. 55 (5), (2015). DOI: 10.1016/j.sandf.2015.09.006. [Google Scholar]
  17. Y. Huang, X. Jiang. Field-observed phenomena of seismic liquefaction and subsidence during the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake in China. Nat Hazards 54 (3), (2010). DOI: 10.1007/s11069-010-9509-6. [Google Scholar]
  18. R.P. Orense, N.A. Hickman, B.T. Hill, M.J. Pender. Spatial evaluation of liquefaction potential in Christchurch following the 2010/2011 Canterbury earthquakes, Int. J. Geotech. Eng. 8 (4), (2014). DOI: 10.1179/1939787913Y.0000000028. [Google Scholar]
  19. Shunji Fujii, Noriaki Isemoto, Yasuhiko Satou, Osamu Kaneko, Hideki Funahara, Toshiaki Arai, Kohji Tokimatsu (Professor). Investigation and Analysis of a Pile Foundation Damaged by Liquefaction during the 1995 Hyogoken-Nambu Earthquake, J. Soils and Foundations 38, (1998). DOI: 10.3208/sandf.38.Special_179. [Google Scholar]
  20. Z.G. Ter-Martirosyan, A.Z. Ter-Martirosyan, Y.S. Sobolev. Creep and vibrocreep of soils, Proceedings XIV international symposium on the rheology of soils - Future directions of the theory and practice of rheology and soil mechanics. Kazan, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  21. I.T. Mirsayapov, I.V. Koroleva. Computational Model of the Carrying Capacity of a Reinforced Foundation with Cyclic Loading, J. Soil Mech. Found. Eng. 52, (2015). DOI: 10.1007/s11204-015-9328-6. [Google Scholar]
  22. T. Tanaka, Mohri Yoshiyuki, A.Z. Zhussupbekov. Elasto-plastic and Viscoplastic Finite Element Analysis - Direct Shear Box Test and Dynamic Deformation of Reinforced Embankment Dam, Proceedings XIII international symposium on the rheology of soils -Achievements, Problems and Perspective Directions of Development for the Theory and Practice of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Problems. Kazan, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  23. Z.G. Ter-Martirosyan, A.Y. Mirnyj, Y.S. Sobolev. Features of determining the parameters of modern soil models during laboratory tests, J. Geotechnika 1, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  24. I.T. Mirsayapov, I.V. Koroleva. Bearing capacity and deformation of the base of deep foundations' ground bases, Proc. intern. symp., Seoul, Korea - Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground / Balkema, Lieden (2014). [Google Scholar]
  25. I.T. Mirsayapov, I.V. Koroleva. Strength and deformability of clay soil under different triaxial load regimes that consider crack formation, J. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering 53, 1 (2016). DOI: 10.1007/s11204-016-9356-x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. I.T. Mirsayapov, I.V. Koroleva. Feature's deformation of clayey soils under cyclic triaxial compression, International Journal of Geotechnical 6, (2010). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.