EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 274 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 274 (2021) 10009 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 274, 2021
2nd International Scientific Conference on Socio-Technical Construction and Civil Engineering (STCCE – 2021)
Article Number 10009
Number of page(s) 7
Section Sustainable Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127410009
Published online 18 June 2021
  1. J. Wang, W. Lin, Y.H. Huang. A performance-oriented risk management frame-work for innovative R&D projects, Technovation 30, 601–611 (2010). DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2010.07.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. G. Du, Z. Liu, H. Lu. Application of innovative risk early warning mode under big data technology in Internet credit financial risk assessment, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 386, 113260 (2021). DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2020.113260. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Berloco, G. De Francisci Morales, D. Frassineti, G. Greco, H. Kumarasinghe, M. Lamieri, E. Massaro, A. Miola, S. Yang. Predicting corporate credit risk: Network contagion via trade credit, PLoS One 16, e0250115 (2021). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250115. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Pirozzi, L. Di Donato, L. Tomassini, A. Ferraro. Possible innovative technical measures for risk prevention during the use of mobile machines with remote guide/control, Procedia Manufacturing, 457–461 (2020). DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.049. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Brattström, J. Frishammar, A. Richtnér, D. Pflueger. Can innovation be measured? A framework of how measurement of innovation engages attention in firms, J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 48, 64–75 (2018). DOI: 10.1016/jjengtecman.2018.04.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. M.J. Trotter, P.M. Salmon, M.G. Lenné. Impromaps: Applying Rasmussen’s Risk Management Framework to improvisation incidents, Saf. Sci. 64, 60–70 (2014). DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.11.021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. T. Röth, P. Spieth. The influence of resistance to change on evaluating an innovation project’s innovativeness and risk: A sensemaking perspective, J. Bus. Res. 101, 83–92 (2019). DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. N.C. Roy. Risk management in small hydropower (SHP) projects of Uttarakhand: An innovative approach: Risk management in small hydropower projects, IIMB Manag. Rev. 32, 291–304 (2020). DOI: 10.1016/j.iimb.2019.10.012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M.L. Santos-Vijande, J.Â. Lopez-Sanchez, P. Pascual-Fernandez, J.M. Rudd. Service innovation management in a modern economy: Insights on the interplay between firms ’ innovative culture and project-level success factors, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 165, 120562 (2021). DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120562. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Boobis, M. Embry, T. Pastoor. The HESI Risk 21 project: An innovative tool in risk assessment, Toxicol. Lett. 280, S56 (2017). DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2017.07.139. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Romanova, I. Evgeniya. Operational services management in the context of sustainable development of intelligent technologies, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 890, (2020). DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/890/1/012183. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Gurtuev, E. Derkach, S. Makhosheva, Z. Ivanov. A Bayesian approach to investment in innovation projects with the presence of fake innovators, Heliyon 6, e05603 (2020). DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05603. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. O. Kleshcheva, F. Sayfullina, N. Abdukhanova. Complex criterion for evaluating contractor’s activities in the construction industry, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 890, (2020). DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/890/1/012116. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. E. Shagiakhmetova, O. Borovskikh, A. Nizamova, T. Kazymova. Multivariate model of construction project operational efficiency, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 890, (2020). DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/890/1/012113. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ustinova, L., Sirazetdinov, R.: Factors affecting the parameters of the construction industry. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 890, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/890/1/012117. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. O. Bakhareva, T. Azhimov, L. Azhimova, L. Marfina, A. Khuzagaripov. The classification of transaction costs: The innovation in the construction industry based on building information modeling. A case study of multilingual schools, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 890, (2020). DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/890/1/012118. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Afanasyeva, R. Safma, I. Kursina. Sustainable cities: Major challenges and trends, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 890, (2020). DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/890/1/012181. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sychev, M., Evstafieva, A., Pozdeev, V., Chugunova, I.: Management of sustainable economic potential of construction enterprise. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 890, (2020). DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/890/1/012115. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. E. Shagiakhmetova, Y. Medyanik, L. Gimadieva, D. Vakhitova, I. Yarullina. Economic efficiency of plastic recycling plant construction, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 890, (2020). DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/890/1/012114. [Google Scholar]
  20. H. Lionboui, T. Benabdelouahab, A. Htitiou, Y. Lebrini, A. Boudhar, R. Hadria, F. Elame. Spatial assessment of losses in wheat production value: A need for an innovative approach to guide risk management policies, Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ 18, 100300 (2020). DOI: 10.1016/j.rsase.2020.100300. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.