EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 274 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 274 (2021) 10011 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 274, 2021
2nd International Scientific Conference on Socio-Technical Construction and Civil Engineering (STCCE – 2021)
Article Number 10011
Number of page(s) 9
Section Sustainable Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127410011
Published online 18 June 2021
  1. Jordan D. Clark, Brennan, D. Less, Max H. Sherman. Efficacy of occupancybased smart ventilation control strategies in energy-efficient homes in the United States, Building and Environment 156, 253–267 (2019). DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.03.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. G.P.R. Filho, L.A. Villas. Energy-efficient smart home systems: Infrastructure and decision-making process, Internet of Things 5, 153–167 (2019). DOI: 10.1016/j.iot.2018.12.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. E. Araral. Why do cities adopt smart technologies? Contingency theory and evidence from the United States, Cities 106 (2), (2020). DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102873. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. H. Gimpel, V. Graf, V. Graf-Drasch. A comprehensive model for individuals’ acceptance of smart energy technology - A meta-analysis, Energy Policy 138 (3), (2020). DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111196. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Chen, A. Sinha, K. Hu, M.I. Shah. Impact of technological innovation on energy efficiency in industry 4.0 era: Moderation of shadow economy in sustainable development, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 164 (3), (2021). [Google Scholar]
  6. P. Pelli. Service innovation and sustainable construction: analyses of wood vis-à-vis other construction projects. Cleaner Engineering and Technology 16 (2), 100061 (2021). DOI: 10.1016/j.clet.2021.100061. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. C. Wilson, H. Pettifor, G. Chryssochoidis. Quantitative modelling of why and how homeowners decide to renovate energy efficiently, Applied Energy 212 (2), 1333–1344 (2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.11.099. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. B. Risholt, T. Berker. Success for energy efficient renovation of dwellings - Learning from private homeowner, Energy Policy 61, 1022–1030 (2013). DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Na Li, X. Wang, W. Zhang. The overhauls technical innovation project optimization method of power grid device based on Life Cycle Asset Management, Energy Reports 6 (12), 1249–1254 (2020). DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2020.11.047. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. H. Feng, D.R. Liyanage, K. Hewage. BIM-based life cycle environmental performance assessment of single-family houses: Renovation and reconstruction strategies for aging building stock in British Columbia, Journal of Cleaner Production 250, 11954320 (2020). DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119543. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. H. Rivera-Gomez, A. Gharbi. Production control problem integrating overhaul and subcontracting strategies for a quality deteriorating manufacturing system, International Journal of Production Economics 171 (1), 134–150 (2016). DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.10.008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Pugach, V. Vyshinsky, A. Bischi. Energy efficiency analysis for a kilowatt class vanadium redox flow battery system, Applied Energy 253 (1), 113533 (2019). DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113533. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. P. Kofi Adom. Evaluation of energy efficiency performances in Africa under heterogeneous technologies, Journal of Cleaner Production 209, 1170–1181 (2019). DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.320. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. E.V. Ilina, A.I. Romanova. Operational services management in the context of sustainable development of intelligent technologies, IOP Conference Series 890, (2020). DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/890/1/012183. [Google Scholar]
  15. D.O. Burkeev, A.I. Romanova, A.A. Murafa, O.V. Maksimchuk, A.V. Voronin. Innovation Technology Implementation in Facility Services in Russia, UERN 1, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  16. A.N. Afanasyeva, S.F. Fedorova. Availability of innovative housing from the perspective of sustainable construction, IOP Conference Series 890, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  17. E.V. Ilina, A.I. Romanova, O.V. Maksimchuk, A.V. Voronin. Development of the construction industry in the context of import substitution: Russian experience, Espacios 38 (48), 18 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Kwatra, A. Kumar, P. Sharma. A critical review of studies related to construction and computation, Sustainable Development Indices Ecological Indicators 112 (5) (2020). [Google Scholar]
  19. A.I. Romanova, G.M. Zagidullina, A.N. Afanasyeva, R.S. Khairetdinova. Experience in the region to increase the availability of housing services, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 6 (4), 549–554 (2015). DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s2p549. [Google Scholar]
  20. Rao, Y. The Sustainable Development Goals, Organizational Learning and Efficient Resource Management in Construction, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 13 (6), 104984 (2020). DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104984. [Google Scholar]
  21. G. Akhmerova, A. Zalyalova, R. Mukhametshina. Impact of soil moisture on heat losses of pipelines of district heat supply networks at underground channel-free gasket, IOP Conference Series 890, 012153 (2020). DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/890/1/012153. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.