EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 275 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 275 (2021) 01063 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 275, 2021
2021 International Conference on Economic Innovation and Low-carbon Development (EILCD 2021)
Article Number 01063
Number of page(s) 6
Section Energy Application and Ecological Resource Sustainability
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127501063
Published online 21 June 2021
  1. Wuttke D. A., Blome C., Foerstl K., et al. Managing the innovation adoption of supply chain finance [J]. Journal of Business Logistics, 2013, 34(2): 148-166. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Wandfluh M., Hofmann E., Schoensleben P. Financing Buyer-Supplier Dyads: An Empirical Analysis on Financial Collaboration in the Supply Chain. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 2016, 19(3): 1-18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory [M]. NJ: Pearson Education, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zaisheng. H. A Review of Strategic Consensus Theory [J]. Foreign Economics and Management, 2010, 32(3): 11-17+39. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hong W, Chuanming C. The impact of entrepreneurial social capital on strategic consensus among stakeholders [J]. Nanjing Social Sciences, 2013, 24(10): 21-28. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hofmann E. Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning and Operations [J]. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 2013, 19(3): 212-213. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hofmann E. Supply Chain Finance: Some Conceptual Insights [J /OL]. Lasch R., Janker C. G. (Hrsg.), Logistik Management-Innovation Logistikkonzepte, 2005, S: 203-214 [Google Scholar]
  8. Hua S, Qiang L. What kind of SMEs can benefit from supply chain finance? A Network and Capability Perspective [J]. Management World, 2017, (6): 104-121. [Google Scholar]
  9. Baofeng H, Zhi C, Siyu L, et al. Research on the Matching of Supply Chain Internal Integration and External Integration [J]. Systems Engineering Theory & Practice, 2016, 36(2): 363-373. [Google Scholar]
  10. Robert B., Ortmeyer G. Channel partnerships streamline distribution [J]. Sloan Management Review, 2002, 12(3): 55-96. [Google Scholar]
  11. Xiaohong C. An empirical study on the impact of supply chain integration on the performance of manufacturing enterprises: A case study of manufacturing enterprises in Hunan Province [J]. Accounting Bulletin: Integrated (2), 2010. [Google Scholar]
  12. Guoping L. Research on Supply Chain Financing Mode and Risk Control of High-tech Enterprises [D]. Tianjin: Nankai University, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kandemir D., Acur N. Examining Proactive Strategic Decision-Making Flexibility in New Product Development [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2012, 29(4): 608-622. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhou K. Z., Wu F. Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 31(5): 547-561. [Google Scholar]
  15. Romijn H., Albaladejom. Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in southeast England [J]. Research Policy, 2002, 31(7): 1053-1067. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Luo Y. Procedural fairness and interfirm cooperation in strategic alliances [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2008, 29(1): 27-46. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ting X., Jianjun Y., The role of inter-firm trust, cooperation model and cooperative innovation performance: the moderating role of knowledge base compatibility [J]. East China Economic Management, 2017 (12): 35-43. [Google Scholar]
  18. Flynn B B., Huo B., Zhao X. The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach [J]. Journal of Operation Management, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sanchez R. Strategic Flexibility in Product Competition [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1995, 16(1): 135-159. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhuoer Y, Shanhang G, Nan Z. The moderating role of strategic flexibility in the impact of exploratory innovation and applied innovation on environmental uncertainty [J]. Science Research Management, 2016, 37(1): 1-10. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.