Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 275, 2021
2021 International Conference on Economic Innovation and Low-carbon Development (EILCD 2021)
Article Number 03038
Number of page(s) 5
Section Environmental Protection and Governance Innovation Technology Research
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127503038
Published online 21 June 2021
  1. Wallis, C., & Holcombe, L. J. (2020). A review of the frequency and impact of periodontal disease in dogs. Journal of Small Animal Practice, 61(9), 529-540. R. M. Allan, V. J. Adams, N. W. Johnston. Prospective randomised blinded clinical trial assessing effectiveness of three dental plaque control methods in dogs[J]. Journal of Small Animal Practice, 2019, 60(4). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Slot, D. E., Wiggelinkhuizen, L., Rosema, N. A. M., & Van der Weijden, G. A. (2012). The efficacy of manual toothbrushes following a brushing exercise: a systematic review. International journal of dental hygiene, 10(3), 187-197. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Pretara-Spanedda P, Grossman E, Curro FA, Generallo C. Toothbrush bristle density: relationship to plaque removal. American Journal of Dentistry. 1989 Dec; 2(6):345-348. [Google Scholar]
  4. Beals D, Ngo T, Feng Y, Cook D, Grau D G, Weber D A. Development and laboratory evaluation of a new toothbrush with a novel brush head design.[J]. American journal of dentistry, 2000, 13 (Spec No). [Google Scholar]
  5. Cifcibasi, E., Koyuncuoglu, C. Z., Baser, U., Bozacioglu, B., Kasali, K., & Cintan, S. (2014). Comparison of manual toothbrushes with different bristle designs in terms of cleaning efficacy and potential role on gingival recession. European journal of dentistry, 8(3), 395. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Beke, A. L. (1967). Functional stiffness characteristics of toothbrush bristles. Journal of dental research, 46(4), 666-671. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Thamke, M. V., Beldar, A., Thakkar, P., Murkute, S., Ranmare, V., & Hudwekar, A. (2018). Comparison of bacterial contamination and antibacterial efficacy in bristles of charcoal toothbrushes versus noncharcoal toothbrushes: A microbiological study. Contemporary clinical dentistry, 9(3), 463. [Google Scholar]
  8. Battaglia, A. (2008). The Bass technique using a specially designed toothbrush. International journal of dental hygiene, 6(3), 183-187. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cheng, G., Li, D., Sun, X. F., & Gong, P. (2011, September). The model research of upper limb and toothbrush in ergonomics. In 2011 IEEE 18th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (pp. 644-646). IEEE.MA Hurairah, Z Ali, M Rasool. (2018). To Study the Anthropometry and Other Ergonomic Aspects of Toothbrush. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhu, Y. F. (2011). A Design Principle of Toothbrush Handle Based on Ergonomic Theory. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 121–126, 622–626. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Löe, H. (1967). The gingival index, the plaque index and the retention index systems. The Journal of Periodontology, 38(6), 610-616. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Miller, B. R., & Harvey, C. E. (1994). Compliance with oral hygiene recommendations following periodontal treatment in client-owned dogs. Journal of Veterinary Dentistry, 11(1), 18-19. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Frendsen A. (1986). Mechanical oral hygiene practices. In: Loe H, Kleinman DV, eds. Dental Plaque Control Measures and Oral Hygiene Practice. Oxford, IRL Press, 93–116. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.