EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 280 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 280 (2021) 07016 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 280, 2021
Second International Conference on Sustainable Futures: Environmental, Technological, Social and Economic Matters (ICSF 2021)
Article Number 07016
Number of page(s) 7
Section Sustainable Materials and Technologies
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202128007016
Published online 30 June 2021
  1. W. Tangsopha, J. Thongsri, A Novel Ultrasonic Cleaning Tank Developed by Harmonic Response Analysis and Computational Fluid Dynamics. Metals. 10(3), 335 (2020). doi:10.3390/met10030335 [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Roohia R., E. Abedib, S.M. Hashemi, K. Marszałek, J.M. Lorenzo, F. Barbae, Ultrasoundassisted bleaching: Mathematical and 3D computational fluid. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies. 55, 66–79 (2019). doi:10.1016/j.ifset.2019.05.014 [Google Scholar]
  3. F. Duran, M. Teke, Design and implementation of an intelligent ultrasonic cleaning device. Intelligent Automation and Soft Computing (2018). doi: 10.31209/2018.11006161 [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Rahim, H. Bargoshadi, S. Sarrafi, Design and Manufacture an Ultrasonic Dispersion System. Sensors & Transducers Journal. 126(3), 52–63 (2011). doi:10.1109/CSPA.2011.5759903 [Google Scholar]
  5. C. Rajani, A. Klami, A. Salmi, T. Rauhala, E. Haeggström, P. Myllymäki, Detecting industrial fouling by monotonicity during ultrasonic cleaning. in AALBORG:018 IEEE 28th International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP), Aalborg, Denmark, 17–20 September, 2018. doi:10.1109/MLSP.2018.8517080 [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Simeone, E. Woolley, J. Escrig, N.J. Watson, Intelligent Industrial Cleaning: A Multi-Sensor Approach Utilising Machine Learning-Based Regression. Sensors. 20, 3642 (2020). doi:10.3390/s20133642 [Google Scholar]
  7. V. Morkun, O. Kravchenko, Adaptive control over ultrasonic cleaning of mining equipment. E3S Web of Conferences (2020), 01005 (2020). doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202020101005 [Google Scholar]
  8. I. Papa, V. Lopresto, A. Langella, Ultrasonic inspection of composites materials: Application to detect. International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture. 4(1), 37–42 (2021). doi:10.1016/j.ijlmm.2020.04.002 [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Majhi, A. Mukherjee, N. George, V. Karaganov, Corrosion Monitoring in Steel Bars using Laser Ultrasonic Guided Waves and Advanced Signal Processing. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 149, 107176 (2021). doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107176 [Google Scholar]
  10. Z. Liao, X. Zhang, T. Liu, J. Jia, S.T. Tu, Characteristics of high-temperature equipment monitoring using dry-coupled ultrasonic waveguide transducers. Ultrasonics. 108, 106236 (2020). doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2020.106236 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Z.-F. Yang, Y. Tian, H.-Q. Zhou, Y. Xu, W.-B. Zhang, J.-M. Li, Nonlinear Ultrasonic Response of TATB-Based Polymer, in 19th World Conference on Non-Destructive Testing 2016, 1–8 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  12. Z. Yang, Y. Tian, W. Li, H.-Q. Zhou, W.-B. Zhang, J.- M. Li, Experimental Investigation of the Acoustic Nonlinear Behavior in Granular Polymer Bonded Explosives with Progressive Fatigue Damage. Materials. 10, 660 (2017). doi:10.3390/ma10060660 [Google Scholar]
  13. V. Morkun, N. Morkun, A. Pikilniak. The Propagation of Ultrasonic Waves in Gas-containing Suspensions, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, (2019), p 142. [Google Scholar]
  14. B.E. Treeby, T. Cox, k-Wave: MATLAB toolbox for the simulation and reconstruction of photoacoustic wave fields. Journal of Biomedical Optics. 15(2), 021314 (2010). doi: 10.1117/1.3360308 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. B. E. Treeby, J. Jaros, A. P. Rendell, B. T. Cox, Modelling nonlinear ultrasound propagation in heterogeneous media with power law absorption using a k-space pseudospectral method. Acoustical Society of America. 131(6), 4324–4336 (2012). doi: 10.1121/1.4712021 [Google Scholar]
  16. N. Karnik, J. Mendel, Centroid of a type-2 fuzzy set, Inform. Sci., 132, 195–220, (2001). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.