Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 283, 2021
2021 3rd International Conference on Civil, Architecture and Urban Engineering (ICCAUE 2021)
Article Number 02027
Number of page(s) 5
Section Urban Planning and Protection of Natural Environment Facilities
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202128302027
Published online 07 July 2021
  1. Chan, S., Miranda-Moreno, L. A station-level ridership model for the metro network in Montreal, Quebec. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 40(3),254–262 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown, J., Hess, D.B., Shoup, D. Unlimited access. Transportation, 28(3),233–267. (2001) [Google Scholar]
  3. Kuby, M., Barranda, A., Upchurch, C. Factors influencing light-rail station boardings in the United States. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 38(3),223–247. (2004) [Google Scholar]
  4. Cardozo, O.D., Garcia-Palomares, J.C., Gutiérrez, J. Application of geographically weighted regression to the direct forecasting of transit ridership at station-level. Applied Geography, 34, 548–558. (2012) [Google Scholar]
  5. Cristaldi, F. Commuting and gender in Italy: A methodological issue. The Professional Geographer, 57(2),268–284. (2005) [Google Scholar]
  6. Giuliano, G. Travel, location and race/ethnicity. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 37(4),351–372. (2003) [Google Scholar]
  7. Gutiérrez, J., Cardozo, O.D., Garcia-Palomares, J.C. Transit ridership forecasting at station level: An approach based on distance-decay weighted regression. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6),1081–1092. (2011) [Google Scholar]
  8. Filion, P. Suburban mixed-use centres and urban dispersion: What difference do they make? Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 33(1),141–160. (2001) [Google Scholar]
  9. Gan, Z., Yang, M., Feng, T., Timmermans, H.J.P. Examining the relationship between built environment and metro ridership at station-to-station level. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 82, 102332. (2020) [Google Scholar]
  10. Shao, Q., Zhang, W., Cao, X., Yang, J., Yin, J.. Threshold and moderating effects of land use on metro ridership in Shenzhen: Implications for TOD planning. Journal of Transport Geography, 89, 102878. (2020) [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhao, J., Deng, W., Song, Y., Zhu, Y. What influences metro station ridership in China? Insights from Nanjing. Cities, 35, 114–124. (2013) [Google Scholar]
  12. Jun, M.J., Choi, K., Jeong, J.E., Kwon, K.H., Kim, H.J. Land use characteristics of subway catchment areas and their influence on subway ridership in Seoul. Journal of Transport Geography, 48, 30–40. (2015) [Google Scholar]
  13. Ozbil, A., Peponis, J. The effects of urban form on walking to transit. Paper presented at the 8th International Space syntax Symposium, Santiago de Chile: PUC. (2012) [Google Scholar]
  14. Li, S., Lyu, D., Huang, G., Zhang, X., Gao, F., Chen, Y., Liu, X. (2020). Spatially varying impacts of built environment factors on rail transit ridership at station level: A case study in Guangzhou, China. Journal of Transport Geography, 82. [Google Scholar]
  15. Liu, Y., Yang, D., Timmermans, H.J.P., de Vries, B. (2020). The impact of the street-scale built environment on pedestrian metro station access/egress route choice. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 87, 102491. [Google Scholar]
  16. Buehler, R. (2011). Determinants of transport mode choice: A comparison of Germany and the USA. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(4),644–657. DOI: doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/jjtrangeo.2010.07.005 [Google Scholar]
  17. Verhoeven, M., Arentze, T., Timmermans, H.J.P., van der Waerden, P. (2007). Examining temporal effects of lifecycle events on transport mode choice decisions. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 11(1),1–13. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.