Evaluation Index System of Marine Ecological Environment

Open Access

Issue		E3S Web Conf. Volume 293, 2021 2021 3^rd Global Conference on Ecological Environment and Civil Engineering (GCEECE 2021)


Article Number		01005
Number of page(s)		4
Section		Ecological Environment Protection and Pollution Control
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202129301005
Published online		23 July 2021

Zhu Chaoqi. 2019. Introduction to the Themed Issue on New Advances in Marine Environmental Engineering in China. Journal of Marine Environmental Engineering, 10(3): 163–164. [Google Scholar]
Duarte C. M. 2014. Global change and the future ocean: a grand challenge for marine sciences. Frontiers in Marine Science, 1: 63. [Google Scholar]
Jones P. J. S. 2013. A governance analysis of the Galapagos Marine Reserve. Marine Policy, 41: 65–71. [Google Scholar]
Yuanbin Fu, Yue Qi, Jing Kang, Ji Yu, Gongbo Ma, Chuanjun Wang and Yongguang Sunn. 2019. Coastal Wetland Vulnerability under the Influence of Human Activities: A Case Study of the Liaohe Estuary. Journal of Marine Environmental Engineering, 10(3): 181–193. [Google Scholar]
Ji-Yu C., Shen-Liang C. 2002. Estuarine and coastal challenges in China. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 20(2): 174–181. [Google Scholar]
Chuanjun Wang, Yingchao Wu, Ke Cao, Guangquan Chen, Wenquan Liu, Yuguang Wang and Yueyin Cai. (2019). Seawater Intrusion in the Coastal Area of Liaodong Bay. Journal of Marine Environmental Engineering, 10(3): 211–223. [Google Scholar]
Nguyen Thi The Nguyen and Grettel Gretchen. 2018. Regional Risk Zonation of Environmental Pollution on Marine and Coastal Zone. Journal of Marine Environmental Engineering, 10(2): 97–107 [Google Scholar]
Du Xing, Sun Yongfu, Song Yupeng, Zhu Chaoqi. 2021. In-Situ Observation of Wave-Induced Pore Water Pressure in Seabed Silt in the Yellow River Estuary of China. Journal of Marine Environmental Engineering, 10(4): 243–255. [Google Scholar]
Grossman G. M., Krueger A. B. 1994. Economic Growth and the Environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2): 353–377. [Google Scholar]
Kenneth Arrow, Bert Bolin, Robert Costanza, Partha Dasgupta, Carl Folke, C.S. Holling, Bengtowe Jansson, Simon Levin, KarlgÖran MÄler, Charles Perrings and David Pimentel. 1996. Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment. Environment and Development Economics, 1(1), 104–110. [Google Scholar]
Martinez M. L., Intralawan A., Vázquez G., Pérez-Maqueo O., Sutton P., and Landgrave R. 2007. The coasts of our world: Ecological, economic and social importance. Ecological economics, 63(2-3), 254–272. [Google Scholar]
Kildow J. T., Mcilgorm A. 2010. The importance of estimating the contribution of the oceans to national economies. Marine Policy, 34(3): 367–374. [Google Scholar]
Quicoy A. R., Briones N. D. 2009. Beach carrying capacity assessment of coastal ecotourism in Calatagan, Batangas, Phlippines. Journal of Environmental Science & Management, 12(2): 11–26. [Google Scholar]
Song Liang, Lian Dongyan. The stability of marine ecological environment under the optimal control of switching forward system. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14(7): 1–6. [Google Scholar]
Wang Xianli, Jiang Guoqiang, Wang Junli. 2015. Evaluation of coordinated development of marine envirnment-eonomy system based on multivariate statistical methods. Marine Environmental Science, 34(5): 777–791. [Google Scholar]
Di Qianbin. Guo Yali. 2016. The stres rdlationship verifiation systeminteraction and coordination of the sustaina ble development of marineeconomy measure. Marine environmental science, 35(3): 453–459. [Google Scholar]
Chen Qi, Li Jingmei. 2015. Analysis on the decoupling relationship between marine environmental stress and marine economic growth in China. Marine environmental science, 34(6): 827–833. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.