Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 293, 2021
2021 3rd Global Conference on Ecological Environment and Civil Engineering (GCEECE 2021)
Article Number 01020
Number of page(s) 8
Section Ecological Environment Protection and Pollution Control
Published online 23 July 2021
  1. Sun P. Y., Gao Z. H., Zhou Q., et al. Evaluation of the Oil Spill Accident in Bohai Sea, China[J]. Environ. Forensics, 2009, 10(4):308–316. [Google Scholar]
  2. Van-Cuong, Do, Hong-Xiang Ren. Simulation of Bohai sea tidal during Penglai 19-3 oil spill accident based on Mike21 model[C]. 2019 2nd Asia Conference on Energy and Environment Engineering (ACEEE), 2019. [Google Scholar]
  3. Jie G., Xin L., Qiang X. Characteristics of the Bohai Sea oil spill and its impact on the Bohai Sea ecosystem[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2013, 58(019):2276–2281. [Google Scholar]
  4. Li H., Li Y., Li C., et al. Bohai and Yellow Sea Oil Spill Prediction System and Its Application to Huangdao '11.22' Oil Spill Incident[J]. Iop Conference, 2017, 81:012054. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang Y., Lee K., Liu D., et al. Environmental impact and recovery of the Bohai Sea following the 2011 oil spill[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2020, 263(Pt B): 114–343. [Google Scholar]
  6. Carmo D., Antunes J., Pinho, et al. Oil Spills in Coastal Zones: Predicting Slick Transport and Weathering Processes[J]. Open Ocean Eng. J., 2010, 3(3):129–142. [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Antunes do Carmo, J.L. Pinho, J.P. Vieira. Oil Spills in Coastal Zones: Predicting Slick Transport and Weathering Processes[J]. Open Ocean Eng. J., 2010, 3:129–142. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kameleh Aghajanloo, Moharam Dolatshahi Pirooz. The Simulation of the Oil Weathering Processes in Marine Environment[J]. 2011 International Conference on Environmental and Computer Science, 2011, 19. [Google Scholar]
  9. Xue J., Yu Y., Bai Y., et al. Marine Oil-Degrading Microorganisms and Biodegradation Process of Petroleum Hydrocarbon in Marine Environments: A Review[J]. Current Microbiology, 2015, 71(2):220–228. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Stephanie E. Chang, Jeremy Stone, Kyle Demes and Marina Piscitelli. Consequences of oil spills: a review and framework for informing planning[J]. Ecology and Society, 2014, 19(2):26. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mostafawi N. How severely was the Persian Gulf affected by oil spills following the 1991 Gulf War?[J]. Environmental Geology, 2001, 40(10):1185–1191. [Google Scholar]
  12. Yafeng, Guiqin, Zhiguo, et al. Research on the Assessment Method of Oil Spill Environmental Risks of Offshore Oil Facilities[J]. Aquatic Procedia, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  13. Han Y., Nambi I. M., Clement T. P. Environmental impacts of the Chennai oil spill accident-A case study[J]. Sci. Total Environ., 2018, 626:795–806. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Okandan E., F. Gümrah, Demiral, B. Importance of assessment of oil pollution along Black Sea coast and Bosphorous Strait-Turkey[C]// International Seminar on Nuclear War & Planetary Emergencies Session. 2001. [Google Scholar]
  15. Liu X., Wirtz K. W. Decision making of oil spill contingency options with fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J]. Water Resour. Manag., 2007 21(4): 663–676. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lang Y. H., Cheng F. F., Wang N. N. Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of Oil Spills Pollution Level for Offshore Platform[J]. Appl. Mech. Mater., 2011, 71-78:3012–3015. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhou J., Xu L. The Damage Assessment of Marine Oil Spill Pollution Using Back-Propagation Neural Network[J]. Energy Procedia, 2011, 11:3116–3121. [Google Scholar]
  18. Han D., Wang G. Y., Zang T. Y. Application of Fuzzy Decision Theory in the Oil-Gas Field Production and Management[J]. Appl. Mech. Mater., 2014, 488-489:1297–1300. [Google Scholar]
  19. Mil’Shtein L. M. Comprehensive Evaluation and Selection of Separators for the Oil and Gas Industry [J]. Chemical & Petroleum Engineering, 2014, 49(11-12):727–735. [Google Scholar]
  20. Fingas M. Weather Effects on Oil Spill Countermeasures[J]. Oil Spill Science and Technology, 2011:339–426. [Google Scholar]
  21. Dong Y. Factors influencing marine oil spills and cleanup operations[J]. Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 2009(S1):40–42. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hongjun, You, Hongjie, et al. Forecasting the yield of oil field gas with the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method and the genetic algorithm[J]. Chemical Technology, 2014, 9(1):4–7. [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhao J., Jin J., Zhu J., et al. Water Resources Risk Assessment Model based on the Subjective and Objective Combination Weighting Methods[J]. Water Resour. Manag., 2016, 30(9):3027–3042. [Google Scholar]
  24. Chan H. K., Wang X. Hierarchical Model in Decision Making[J]. Fuzzy Hierarchical Model for Risk Assessment, 2013, 25–43. [Google Scholar]
  25. Solnes J. Environmental quality indexing of large industrial development alternatives using AHP[J]. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 2003, 23(3):283–303. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sahoo S., Dhar A., Kar A. Environmental vulnerability assessment using Grey Analytic Hierarchy Process based model[J]. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 2016, 56(JAN.):145–154. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhang J. Y., Wang L. C. Assessment of water resource security in Chongqing City of China: What has been done and what remains to be done? [J]. Nat. Hazards, 2015, 75(3):2751–2772. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kang C., Feng J., Zheng Y. Study on Oil and Gas Pipeline Risk Assessment Based on Entropy Weight Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method[J]. Journal of Liaoning Shihua University, 2015, 35(5):27–30, in Chinese. [Google Scholar]
  29. Wang X. L., Xiao J. Z. Multi-objective dynamic programming for the optimal operation of natural gas production and sales[J]. Computer & Communication Technologies in Agriculture Engineering International Confe, 2010, 3:240–243. [Google Scholar]
  30. Lang Y. H., Cheng F. F., Wang N. N. Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of Oil Spills Pollution Level for Offshore Platform[J]. Appl. Mech. Mater., 2011, 71-78:3012–3015. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hao X., Xiao F. Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation of Gas Station Safety[C]// Fuzzy Information and Engineering 2010 - Volume I., Proceedings of the 5 th Annual Conference on Fuzzy Information and Engineering, ACFIE 2010, Sepember 23-27, 2010, Huludao, China. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  32. Liang D., Liu D., Pedrycz W., et al. Triangular fuzzy decision-theoretic rough sets[J]. Int. J. Approx. Reasoning, 2013, 54(8):1087–1106. [Google Scholar]
  33. Wang J., Liu C., Feng J., et al. Literature review of the effects of petroleum hydrocarbons on marine phytoplankton[J]. Environmental Pollution & Control, 2011, 33(4):81–86. [Google Scholar]
  34. Paul J. H., Hollander D., Coble P., et al. Toxicity and mutagenicity of gulf of Mexico waters during and after the deepwater horizon oil spill. [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 48(6):3591–3592. [Google Scholar]
  35. Bejarano A. C., Michel, et al. Oil spills and their impacts on sand beach invertebrate communities: A literature review[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2016, 218(Nov.):709–722. [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhou S. D., Zheng F. Z., Li T. Analysis on the Factors Influencing the Kinematic Viscosity of Petroleum Products[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2012, 459:386–389. [Google Scholar]
  37. Lefebvre-Chalain, Hélèn. Fifteen Years of Particularly Sensitive Sea Areas: A Concept In Development[J]. Ocean and Coastal Law Journal, 2016, 13(1):3–3. [Google Scholar]
  38. Isah M. N. The role of environmental impact assessment in Nigeria's oil and gas industry[J]. Waste Manage., 2012, 32(10):1989–1998. [Google Scholar]
  39. Mark A. Zacharias, Edward J. Gregr. Sensitivity and Vulnerability in Marine Environments: an Approach to Identifying Vulnerable Marine Areas[J]. Conserv. Biol., 2005, 19(1):86–97. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kawarada H., Baba E., Suito H. Effect of spilled oil on coastal ecosystems[C]// Proceedings of Fifth China-Japan Seminar on Numerical Mathematics. Department of Urban Environment Systems Chiba University, 1-33 Yayoicho, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-85SS, Japan, 2002 [Google Scholar]
  41. Deborah F. M., Beegle-Krause C. J., Rowe J., et al. Oil Spill Risk Assessment-Relative Impact Indices by Oil Type and Location[J]. Asascience Com, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  42. Kankara R. S., Arockiaraj S., Prabhu K. Environmental sensitivity mapping and risk assessment for oil spill along the Chennai Coast in India[J]. Mar. Pollut. Bull., 2016, 106(1-2):95–103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Li F., Zhang H., Chen L., et al. Influencing Factors of Oil Slick Movement on Tidal Rivers[C]// International Conference on Bioinformatics & Biomedical Engineering. IEEE, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  44. Beegle-Krause C. J., Lehr W. J. Oceanographic and Meteorological Effects on Spilled Oil[M]. Handbook of Oil Spill Science and Technology, 2015:301–310. [Google Scholar]
  45. Stringari C. E., Marques W. C., Mello L., et al. Modeling the wind influence in an oil spill along the southern Brazilian shelf[J]. Engenharia Térmica (Thermal Engineering), 2012, 11(1-2):100–109. [Google Scholar]
  46. Brovchenko I., Kuschan A., Maderich V., et al. The modelling system for simulation of the oil spills in the Black Sea[J]. Oceanography, 2003, 69:586–591. [Google Scholar]
  47. Schwartzberg H. G. The movement of oil spills[J]. International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings, 1971(1):489–494. [Google Scholar]
  48. Murray S. P. The Effects of Weather Systems, Currents, and Coastal Processes on Major Oil Spills at Sea[J]. Pollut. Transfer Transp. Sea, 2018(2):169–227. [Google Scholar]
  49. Hellmann H. Influence of water temperature on the behavior of floating crude oil[J]. Erdoel & Kohle, Erdgas, Petrochemie, 1973, 26(9):513–517. [Google Scholar]
  50. Reisbig R. L. Oil Spill Drift Caused by the Coupled Effects of Wind and Waves[R]. Missouri Univ-Rolla Div of Engineering Research, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  51. Bechtel R. D., Wickley-Olsen E., Boufadel M. C., et al. The movement of oil at sea due to irregular waves[J]. International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings, 2008(1):943–947. [Google Scholar]
  52. Liu H., Xiao Y., Gao X. Study on Environmental Supervision of Marine Oil Spill Pollution[J]. Ecological Economy, 2018, 34(7):185–189, in Chinese. [Google Scholar]
  53. Weiwei J., Wei A., Yupeng Z., et al. Research on Evaluation of Emergency Response Capacity of Oil Spill Emergency Vessels[J]. Aquatic Procedia, 2015, 3:66–73, in Chinese. [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhao Y. W., Yang Z. F. Integrative fuzzy hierarchical model for river health assessment: A case study of Yong River in Ningbo City, China[J]. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 2009, 14(4):1729–1736. [Google Scholar]
  55. Alonso J. A., Ma T. L. A Statistical Criterion of Consistency in the Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. International Conference on Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  56. Alonso J. A., Lamata M. T. Consistency in the analytic hierarchy process: a new approach[J]. Int. J. Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowl.-Based Syst., 2006, 14(4):445–459. [Google Scholar]
  57. Lowen R. Categorical methods and techniques in fuzzy mathematics[J]. Fuzzy Sets Syst., 1999, 104(3): 357. [Google Scholar]
  58. Jiang X., Bao Z., Wang L. The coupled method Fuzzy-AHP applys to solve multi-criteria decision making problems. World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS), 2009, 8(11). [Google Scholar]
  59. Wang J. Q., Li X. E., Chen X. H. Hesitant Fuzzy Soft Sets with Application in Multicriteria Group Decision Making Problems[J]. Sci. World J., 2015:806–983. [Google Scholar]
  60. Oil spill in Penglai 19-3 Oilfield[EB/OL]. [Google Scholar]
  61. State Oceanic Administration announces investigation of oil spill accident in Penglai 19-3 Oilfield[EB/OL]. [Google Scholar]
  62. The platform fault of Suizhong 36-1 oilfield of CNOOC has been eliminated and the oil film is being cleaned[EB/OL]. 11/07-13/3177919.shtml [Google Scholar]
  63. Zhang Q., Liu L., Pan B. Y., et al. Marine oil-spill pollution assessment model based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J]. Marine Science, 2016, 40(5):97–102, in Chinese. [Google Scholar]
  64. Liu Jie. Research on the method of the level assessment of oil spill pollution on Bohai offshore platform[D]. Ocean University of China, 2010, in Chinese. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.