EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 293 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 293 (2021) 02001 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 293, 2021
2021 3rd Global Conference on Ecological Environment and Civil Engineering (GCEECE 2021)
Article Number 02001
Number of page(s) 7
Section Environmental Energy and Civil Engineering and Water Conservancy Construction
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202129302001
Published online 23 July 2021
  1. Code for seismic design of buildings, vol. GB 50011 2. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  2. L. I. N. Cheng-Xin and F. Wang, “Review of shape memory alloy application status NIU,” J. TIANJIN Univ. Technol., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1–6, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Mohd Jani, M. Leary, A. Subic, and M. A. Gibson, “A review of shape memory alloy research, applications and opportunities,” Mater. Des., vol. 56, pp. 1078–1113, 2014, DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.084. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Y. Jiannan, “A Review of Shape Memory Alloys: Mechanical Behavior and Application,” Chinese J. Solid Mech., 2021. [Google Scholar]
  5. D. J. Hartl and D. C. Lagoudas, “Aerospace applications of shape memory alloys,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part G J. Aerosp. Eng., vol. 221, no. 4, pp. 535–552, 2007, DOI: 10.1243/09544100JAERO211. [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Stoeckel, “Shape Memory Actuators for Automotive Applications,” Mater. Des., vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 302–307, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  7. D. Mantovani, “Shape memory alloys: properties and biomedical applications,” Jom, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 36–44, 2000, DOI: 10.1007/s11837-000-0082-4. [Google Scholar]
  8. S. R. Oh et al., “A comparison of nickel-titanium rotary instruments manufactured using different methods and cross-sectional areas: ability to resist cyclic fatigue,” Oral Surgery, Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endodontology, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 622–628, 2010, DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.12.025. [Google Scholar]
  9. R. Pfeifer, C. W. Müller, C. Hurschler, S. Kaierle, V. Wesling, and H. Haferkamp, “Adaptable orthopedic shape memory implants,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 5, pp. 253–258, 2013, DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2013.01.050. [Google Scholar]
  10. G. Lim, K. Park, M. Sugihara, K. Minami, and M. Esashi, “Future of active catheters,” Sensors Actuators, A Phys., vol. 56, no. 1-2, pp. 113–121, 1996, DOI: 10.1016/0924-4247(96)01279-4. [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Indirli, M. G. Castellano, P. Clemente, and A. Martelli, “Demo-application of Shape Memory Alloy devices: the rehabilitation of the S.Giorgio Church Bell-Tower,” vol. 4330, pp. 262–272, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  12. F. M. Mazzolani and A. Mandara, “Modern trends in the use of special metals for the improvement of historical and monumental structures,” Eng. Struct., vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 843–856, 2002, DOI: 10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00023-8. [Google Scholar]
  13. Z. Deng, “New SMA Energy Dissipation Brace Systems,” J. Beijing Univ. Technol., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 511–515, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  14. B. M. C. Constantinou, P. Tsopelas, A. Member, W. Hammel, A. N. Sigaher, and S. Member, “TOGGLEBRACE-DAMPER SEISMIC ENERGY DISSIPATION SYSTEMS By,” no. February, pp. 105–112, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  15. F. Shi, “Study on the Seismic Performance of Steel Frame Structure Equipped with Novel SMA Bracing System.”. [Google Scholar]
  16. S. J. Hu, Q. Gu, G. Q. Jiang, and J. G. Xiong, “Experimentral study on seimeic performance for an innovative self-centering sma brace,” Gongcheng Lixue/Engineering Mech., vol. 38, no. 1, 2021, DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2020.02.0087. [Google Scholar]
  17. G. U. Qi, S. Guquan, H. U. Shujun, G. U. O. Qi, and J. Jun, “Mechanical properties and design method of an innovative re-centering brace with low friction and SMA,” 2019, DOI: 10.13764/j.cnki.ncdg.2019.03.011. [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Hu, Q. Gu, J. Jiang, G. Song, and J. Xiong, “Hysteresis performance and simplified mechanical model of an innovative self-centering SMA brace,” Jianzhu Jiegou Xuebao/Journal Build. Struct., vol. 41, pp. 66–75, 2020, DOI: 10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2020.S1.008. [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Pan, R. Yue, H. Hui, and Y. Zhu, “Experimental Study on Seismic Performance of Active Confined RC Piers with NiTiNb-SMA Wires,” Hunan Daxue Xuebao/Journal Hunan Univ. Nat. Sci., vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 93–101, 2020, DOI: 10.16339/j.cnki.hdxbzkb.2020.07.011. [Google Scholar]
  20. H. Qian, Z. Ren, J. Xiong, and L. Kang, “Experimental investigation on seismic performance of RC pier columns confined with shape memory alloy wires,” Tumu Gongcheng Xuebao/China Civ. Eng. J., vol. 53, pp. 265–271, 2020, DOI: 10.15951/j.tmgcxb.2020.s2.040. [Google Scholar]
  21. C. Fang, M. C. H. Yam, A. C. C. Lam, and Y. Zhang, “Feasibility study of shape memory alloy ring spring systems for self-centring seismic resisting devices,” Smart Mater. Struct., vol. 24, no. 7, p. 75024, 2015, DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/24/7/075024. [Google Scholar]
  22. J. Sepúlveda, R. Boroschek, R. Herrera, O. Moroni, and M. Sarrazin, “Steel beam-column connection using copper-based shape memory alloy dampers,” J. Constr. Steel Res., vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 429–435, 2008, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2007.09.002. [Google Scholar]
  23. F. Hedayati Dezfuli and M. S. Alam, “Performancebased assessment and design of FRP-based high damping rubber bearing incorporated with shape memory alloy wires,” Eng. Struct., vol. 61, pp. 166–183, 2014, DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.01.008. [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Shinozuka, S. R. Chaudhuri, and S. K. Mishra, “Shape-Memory-Alloy supplemented Lead Rubber Bearing (SMA-LRB) for seismic isolation,” Probabilistic Eng. Mech., vol. 41, pp. 34–45, 2015, DOI: 10.1016/j.probengmech.2015.04.004. [Google Scholar]
  25. S.C. Sourav Gur, Sudib K. Mishra, “Performance assessment of buildings isolated by shape-memory-alloy rubber bearing: Comparison with elastomeric bearing under near-fault earthquakes,” Struct. Control Heal. Monit., vol. 21, pp. 449–465, 2014, DOI: 10.1002/stc. [Google Scholar]
  26. O. E. Ozbulut and S. Hurlebaus, “Evaluation of the performance of a sliding-type base isolation system with a NiTi shape memory alloy device consideringtemperature effects,” Eng. Struct., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 238–249, 2010, DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.09.010. [Google Scholar]
  27. C. Fang, W. Wang, and Y. Chen, “State-of-the-art for application of superelastic shape memory alloy in seismic resistant steel structures,” Jianzhu Jiegou Xuebao/Journal Build. Struct., vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 112, 2019, DOI: 10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2018.C168. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.