Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 297, 2021
The 4th International Conference of Computer Science and Renewable Energies (ICCSRE'2021)
Article Number 01014
Number of page(s) 5
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202129701014
Published online 22 September 2021
  1. Byungchul Cho. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a review with a physics perspective. Radiat Oncol J. 2018 Mar; 36(1): 1–10. M. Ben Rabha, M.F. Boujmil, M. Saadoun, B. Bessaïs, Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. (to be published) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Otto K. Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc. Med Phys. 2008 Jan; 35(1): 310–317 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. James L. Bedford, Michael D. R. Thomas, G. Smyth. Beam modeling and VMAT performance with the Agility 160-leaf multileaf collimator. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013 May 6; 14(2): 4136 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. IAEA TEC DOC 1583, Commissioning of radiotherapy treatment planning systems: testing for typical external beam treatment techniques. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ann Van Esch, Jörg Bohsungb, Pekka Sorvaric, et al. Acceptance tests and quality control (QC) procedures for the clinical implementation of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using inverse planning and the sliding window technique: experience from five radiotherapy departments. Radiother Oncol. 2002 Oct; 65(1): 53–70 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ezzell G.A., Galvin J.M., Low D., et al. AAPM Radiation Therapy committee. Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: report of the IMRT Subcommittee of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee. Med Phys. 2003 Aug; 30 (8): 2089–2115 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Miften M., Olch A., Mihailidis D., et al. Tolerance limits and methodologies for IMRT measurement-based verification QA: Recommendations of AAPM Task Group [Google Scholar]
  8. Hussein M., Rowshanfarzad P., Ebert M.A., Nisbet A., Clark C.H. A comparison of the gamma index analysis in various commercial IMRT/VMAT QA systems. Radiother Oncol. 2013 Dec; 109(3): 370–376. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pulliam K.B., Huang J.Y., Howell R.M., et al. Comparison of 2D and 3D gamma analyses. Med Phys. 2014 Feb; 41(2): 021710. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rajasekaran D., Jeevanandam P., Sukumar P., Ranganathan A., Johnjothi S., Nagarajan V. A study on correlation between 2D and 3D gamma evaluation metrics in patient-specific quality assurance for VMAT. Med Dosim. 2014 Winter; 39(4): 300–308. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.