EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 305 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 305 (2021) 04002 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 305, 2021
RUBIS International Workshop on the Resilience of Rubber-based Agroforestry Systems in the Context of Global Change
Article Number 04002
Number of page(s) 9
Section Food Crops and Food Security in Agroforestry Systems
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202130504002
Published online 23 September 2021
  1. Elbakidze, M., Surov, D., Mu-noz-Rojas, J., Persson, J-O., Dawson, L., Plieninger, T., Pinto-Correia, T. Perceived benefits from agroforestry landscapes across North-Eastern Europe: What matters and for whom?, Landscape and Urban Planning, 2021. 209: 1-13. 104044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104044 [Google Scholar]
  2. Lincoln, N.K. Agroforestryry form and ecological adaptation in ancient Hawai’i: Extent of the pākukui swidden system of Hāmākua, Hawai’i Island. Agricultural Systems, 2020. 181: 102808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102808 [Google Scholar]
  3. Camacho, L. D., M. S. Combalicer, Y. Yeo-Chang, E. A. Combalicer, A. P. Carandang, S. C. Camacho, C. C. de Luna and Lucrecio L. Rebugio. Traditional Forest Conservation Knowledge/Technologies in the Cordillera, Northern Philippines, Forest Policy and Economics, 2012. 22, pp. 3-8. [Google Scholar]
  4. Siswadi, Tukiman Taruna T., H. Purnaweni. Kearifan Lokal Dalam Melestarikan Mata Air (Studi Kasus di Desa Purwogondo, Kecamatan Boja, Kabupaten Kendal), Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan, 2011. 9 (2), pp. 63-68. [Google Scholar]
  5. Senoaji, G. Pengelolaan Lahan dengan Sistem Agroforestryry oleh Masyarakat Baduy di Banten Selatan, Bumi Lestari, 2012. 12 (2), pp. 283-293. [Google Scholar]
  6. Adiputra, N. Tanaman Obat, Tanaman Upacara dan Pelestarian Lingkungan, Jurnal Bumi Lestari, 2011. 11 (2), pp. 346-354. [Google Scholar]
  7. Heywood, H.V. Ethnopharmacology, Food Production, Nutrition and Biodiversity Conservation: Towards a Sustainable Future for Indigenous Peoples, Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 2011. 137, pp. 15. [Google Scholar]
  8. Himmi S.K., M. A. Humaedi dan S. Astutik. Ethnobiological Study of the Plants Uused in the Healing Practices of an Indigenous People Tau Taa Wana in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia, Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2014. 20, pp. 841-846. [Google Scholar]
  9. Nuraeni, Sugiyanto, Z. Kusuma dan Syafrial. Persepsi dan Partisipasi Petani dalam Penerapan Usahatani Konservasi. (Studi Kasus Petani Sayuran Di Hulu DAS Jeneberang), Jurnal Bumi Lestari, 2012. 12 (1), pp. 116-122. [Google Scholar]
  10. Achmad B., H. Simon, D. Diniyati dan T. S. Widyaningsih. Persepsi Petani Terhadap Pengelolaan dan Fungsi Hutan Rakyat di Kabupaten Ciamis, Jurnal Bumi Lestari, 2012. 12 (1), pp. 123-136. [Google Scholar]
  11. Haggar, J., Pons, D., Saens, L., & Vides, M.: ’Contribution of agroforestryry systems to sustaining biodiversity in fragmented forest landscapes’, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2019. 283 (106567), pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.06.006. [Google Scholar]
  12. Faye, J. B.: ’Indigenous farming transitions, sociocultural hybridity and sustainability in rural Senegal’, NJAS Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 2020. 92 (100338), pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2020.100338. [Google Scholar]
  13. Vogliano, C., Murray, L., Coad, J., Wham, C., Maelaua, J., Kafa, R., Burlingame, B.: ’Progress towards SDG 2: Zero hunger in melanesia – A state of data scoping review’, Global Food Security, 2021. 29 (100519), pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100519. [Google Scholar]
  14. Villamora, G.B., & Van Noordwijk, M.: ’ Gender specific land-use decisions and implications for ecosystem services in semi-matrilineal Sumatra’, Global Environmental Change, 2016. 39, pp. 69-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.04.007. [Google Scholar]
  15. Elbakidze, M., D. Surova, J. Munoz-Rojas, J-O. Persson, L. Dawson, T. Plieninger, T. Pinto-Correia.: ’Perceived benefits from agroforestryry landscapes across North-Eastern Europe: What matters and for whom?’, Landscape and Urban Planning, 2021. 209 (104044), pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104044. [Google Scholar]
  16. Quandt, A.: ’Agroforestryry trees for improved food security on farms impacted by wildlife crop raiding in Kenya’, Trees, Forests and People, 2021. 4 (100069), pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2021.100069. [Google Scholar]
  17. Tsufac A.R., Awazi, Y.P., Yerima, B.P.K.: ’Characterization of agroforestryry systems and their effectiveness in soil fertility enhancement in the south -west region of Cameroon’, Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 2021. 3 (100024), pp. 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2020.100024. [Google Scholar]
  18. BPS-Statistic Indonesia.: Statictical Year Book of Indonesia, 2010. Jakarta. [Google Scholar]
  19. Njurumana G. N., Marsono D., Irham, Sadono, R.: Plant Biodiversity Conservation on Kaliwu System at Sumba Island. Manusia dan Lingkungan, 2014. 21 (1): 75-82. [Google Scholar]
  20. Njurumana G. N.: Village Community and Flora Biodiversity Management in Home Garden System at Central of Sumba Regency. Jurnal Penelitian Kehutana n Wallacea, 2016. 5 (1): 25-36. [Google Scholar]
  21. BPS-Statistic Indonesia.: Sumba Tengah In Figure, 2013. Waibakul. [Google Scholar]
  22. Njurumana G. N.: Timberwood resources management on Kaliwu agroforestryry system at Sumba Island, East Nusa Tenggara, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Masyakat Biodiversitas Indonesia, 2015. 1 (3): 629-634. DOI: 10.13057/psnmbi/m010341. [Google Scholar]
  23. BPS-Statistic Indonesia.: Sumba Tengah Regency In Figure, 2020. Waibakul. https://sumbatengahkab.bps.go.id/publication/2020/05/05/31650ac1c363db571fbb3a7a/kabupaten-sumba-tengah-dalam-angka-2020.html. [Google Scholar]
  24. Pushpakumara D.K.N.G., Wijesekara, A., Hunter, D. G. Kandyan Homegardens: a Promising Land Management System in SriLanka. Sustainable Use of Biological Diversity in Socio-ecological Production Landscapes. Background to the Satoyama Initiative for the Benefit of Biodiversity and Human Well-being. CBD Technical Series, 2010. 52, 102–108. [Google Scholar]
  25. Nguyen N.Q.: Diversification and differentiation : Livelihood Strategies of Land-Owning and Landless Households in ‘Thoi Thuan B Hamlet. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 2011. 2 (2), 205–212. [Google Scholar]
  26. Garriti D.P., Akkinifesi, F.K., Ajayi, O.C., Weldesemayat, S.G., Mowo, J.G., Kalinganire, A., Larwanou, M., Dan Bayala, J.: Evergreen Agriculture : A robust approach to sustainable food security in Africa. Food Security 2010. (2) 3, 197-214. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ellis E.A., Baerenklau, K.A., Marcos-Martinez, R., and Chaves E.: Land use/land cover change dynamics and drivers in a low-grade marginal coffee growing region of Veracruz, Mexico. Agroforestryry System 2010. 80 (1), 61-84. [Google Scholar]
  28. Njurumana G. N.: Provision services of biodiversity on Kaliwu agroforestry system, Jurnal Pemuliaan Tanaman Hutan, 2019. 13 (2) : 131-140. [Google Scholar]
  29. BPS-Statistic Indonesia.: Indikator Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Sumba Tengah, 2018. Waibakul. https://sumbatengahkab.bps.go.id/publication/2019/12/19/7a8e30e4f83d942294d5998c/indikator-kesejahteraan-rakyat-kabupaten-sumba-tengah-2018.html. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.