EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 305 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 305 (2021) 05005 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 305, 2021
RUBIS International Workshop on the Resilience of Rubber-based Agroforestry Systems in the Context of Global Change
Article Number 05005
Number of page(s) 9
Section Ecosystem Services and Environmental Issues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202130505005
Published online 23 September 2021
  1. Assogbadjo AE, Kakaï RG, Vodouhê FG, Djagoun CAMS, Codjia JTC, Sinsin B: Biodiversity and socioeconomic factors supporting farmers’ choice of wild edible trees in the agroforestry systems of Benin (West Africa). Forest Policy Econ 2012, 14: 41-49. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bayala J, Kalinganire A, Tchoundjeu Z, Sinclair F, Garrity D: Conservation agriculture with trees in the West African Sahel — a review. World Agroforestry Centre Occasional Paper No. 14. Nairobi; 2011: 72 [Google Scholar]
  3. Cheikh Mbow, Meine Van Noordwijk, Eike Luedeling, Henry Neufeldt, Peter A Minang and Godwin Kowero. 2014. Agroforestry solutions to address food security and climate change challenges in Africa. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2014, 6: 61–67. [Google Scholar]
  4. Dewi S, van Noordwijk M, Dwiputra A, Tata HL, Ekadinata A, Galudra G, Sakuntaladewi N, Widayati A. 2015. Peat and land clearing fires in Indonesia in 2015: Lessons for polycentric governance. ASB Policy Brief 51. Nairobi, Kenya: ASB Partnership for the Tropical Forest Margins. [Google Scholar]
  5. Darmayanti, A. S. (2012). Beberapa sifat fisika kimia tanah yang berpenga ruh terhadap model kecepatan infiltrasi pada tegakan mahoni, jabon, dan trembesi di Kebun Raya Purwodadi. Jurnal Penelitian Hayati, 17(1), 185–191. [Google Scholar]
  6. DeSouza HN, DeGoede RGM, Brussaard L, Cardoso IM, Duarte EMG, Fernandes RBA, Gomes LC, Pulleman MM: Protective shade, tree diversity and soil properties in coffee agroforestry systems in the Atlantic Rainforest biome. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2012, 146: 179-196 [Google Scholar]
  7. Emmanuel F Torquebiau. 2000. A renewed perspective on agroforestry concepts and classification,Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences Series III Sciences de la Vie, Volume 323, Issue 11, Pages 1009-1017,. ISSN 0764-4469,. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0764-4469(00)01239-7. (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0764446900012397) [Google Scholar]
  8. Francis C. & Baldesari (2006). Systematic Reviews of Qualitative Literature. Oxford: UK Cochrane Centre [Google Scholar]
  9. Fahruni. 2015. Analisis Pola Agroforestri Pada Kebun Petani. Jurnal Daun. Jurnal Ilmiah Pertanian dan Kehutanan Universitas Muhamamdiyah, Palangkaraya. Volume 5 Nomor I, Juni [Google Scholar]
  10. Garrity, D.P., Akinnifesi, F.K., Ajayi, O.C. et al. Evergreen Agriculture: a robust approach to sustainable food security in Africa. Food Sec. 2, 197–214 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-010-0070-7 [Google Scholar]
  11. Harja D, Dewi S, van Noordwijk M, Ekadinata A, Rahmanulloh A dan Johana F, 2012. REDD Abacus SP. Buku Panduan Pengguna dan Software. Bogor, Indonesia. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Southeast Asia Regional Program. 148 p. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hairiah K, Ekadinata A, Sari R R dan Rahayu S, 2011. Petunjuk praktis Pengukuran karbon tersimpan di hutan dan lahan-lahan Pertanian berbasis pohon. Ekstrapolasi dari tingkat lahan ke tingkat lanskap. World Agroforestry Centre, ICRAF Southeast Asia. [Google Scholar]
  13. IPCC. 2000. Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry. A Special Report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 377pp. [Google Scholar]
  14. Jamnadass R H, Dawson I K, Franzel S, Leakey R R B, Mithöfer D, Akinnifesi F K et al. 2011. Improving livelihoods and nutrition in sub-Saharan Africa through the promotion of indigenous and exotic fruit production in smallholders’ agroforestry systems: a review. International Forest Review 13: 338–354. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup. 2012. Strategi Nasional. Pengelolaan Lahan Gambut Berkelanjutan di Indonesia. Deputi Bidang pengendalian Kerusakan Lingkungan dan Perubahan Iklim. 50 halama n [Google Scholar]
  16. Martin F S, Lusiana B, Van Noordwijk, 2010. Tree growth prediction in relation to simple set of site quality indicator for six native tree species in the Philippines. Int.J. For.Res. Vol. 2010, Article ID 507392. 10p. DOI: 1155/2010/507392 [Google Scholar]
  17. Maliki R, Cornet D, Floquet A, Sinsin B. 2012. Agronomic and economic performance of yam -based systems with shrubby and herbaceous legumes adapted by smallholders. Outlook on Agriculture 41: 171–178 [Google Scholar]
  18. Nair, P.R., 1993. An introduction to agroforestry. Springer Science & Business Media [Google Scholar]
  19. Nair P K R. 2011. Agroforestry systems and environmental quality: Introduction. In: Chang S, Nair V, Kort J and Khasa D (Eds.). J. Env. Quality, 40 (3): 784-790. [Google Scholar]
  20. Nguyen, Q., Hoang, M.H., Öborn, I. et al. Multipurpose agroforestry as a climate change resiliency option for farmers: an example of local adaptation in Vietnam. Climatic Change 117, 241–257 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0550-1 [Google Scholar]
  21. Sakuntaladewi N, Wibowo LR. 2016. The political economy of peat fire in Tanjung Jab ung Barat Dictrict. In: Tata HL, Tampubolon AP, eds. 2016. Peat fire risk management. A final report of technical agreement of ICRAF and CCRRD with regard to “Secured Landscape: Sustaining Ecosystem and Carbon Benefits by Unlocking Reversal of Emission Drivers in Landscapes”. Bogor, Indonesia: Forest Research and Development Centre. p. 5–33. [Google Scholar]
  22. Susila A D, Purwoko B S, Roshetko J M, Palada M C, Kartika J G, Dahlia L et al., eds. 2012. Vegetable agroforestry systems in Indonesia. Bangkok: World Association of Soil and Water Conservation; Nairobi: World Agroforestry Centre. [Google Scholar]
  23. Sardjono, M. A., Djogo, T., Arifin, H. S., & Wijayanto, N. (2003). Klasifikasi dan pola kombinasi komponen agroforestri: Bahan ajaran agroforestri 2. Bogor: World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF). Retrieved from https://www.worldagroforestry.org/region/sea/publications/download?dl=/lecturenote/LN000204.pdf&pubID=76 [Google Scholar]
  24. Suprayogo D, van Noordwijk M, Hairiah K and Cadisch G. 2002. The inherent ‘safety -net’ of ultisols: Measuring and modeling retarded leaching of mineral nitrogen. Eur.J.Soil Sci. 53, 185-194. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sood KK, Mitchell CP: Household level domestic fuel consumption and forest resource in relation to agroforestry adoption: evidence against need-based approach. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35: 337-345. [Google Scholar]
  26. Suyanto., U. Chokkalingam., P. Wibowo. 2003. Kebakaran di Laha n Rawa/Gambut di Sumatera: Masalahdan Solusi. Prosiding Semiloka (with English summary). Palembang, Sumatera Selatan 10-11 Desember 2003. [Google Scholar]
  27. Van Noordwijk, M.; Dewi, S.; Leimona, B.; Lusiana, B.; Wulandari, D. 2013. Negotiation -Support Toolkit for Learning Landscapes; World Agroforestry Centre: Bogor, Indonesia. p. 285. [Google Scholar]
  28. Verchot, L.V., Van Noordwijk, M., Kandji, S. et al. Climate change: linking adaptation and mitigation through agroforestry. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 12, 901–918 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-007-9105-6 [Google Scholar]
  29. Widayati, Atiek & Tata, Hesti & Van Noordwijk, Meine. (2016). Agroforestry on peatlands: combining productive and protective functions as part of restoration. [Google Scholar]
  30. Widianto, Suprayogo D, Lestari I D. 2007. Alih Guna Lahan Hutan Menjadi Lahan Pertanian : Apakah fungsi hidrologis hutan dapat digantikan sistem kopi monokultur ? Prosiding Seminar sehari: “Penanganan Bencana Sumber Daya Pertanian”, 1 Februari 2007, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.