EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 306 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 306 (2021) 01039 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 306, 2021
The First International Conference on Assessment and Development of Agricultural Innovation (1st ICADAI 2021)
Article Number 01039
Number of page(s) 12
Section Plant Science
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202130601039
Published online 24 September 2021
  1. J. Pijlman, S.J. Berger, F. Lexmond, J. Bloem, J.W. Van Groenigen, E.J.V. Visser, J.W. Erisman, N. Van Eekeren, New Zeal. J. Agric. Res. 1–17, DOI: 10.1080/00288233.2019.1698620 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  2. L.A. Box, G.R. Edward, R.H. Bryant, Milk production and urinary nitrogen excretion of dairy cows grazing perennial ryegrass-white clover and pure plantain pasture, in Proceeding of the 76th New Zealand Society of Animal Production, pp 18–21, New Zealand Society Animal Production (2016) [Google Scholar]
  3. S.L. Woodward, C.D. Waugh, C.G. Roach, D. Fynn, J. Phillips, Are diverse species mixtures better pastures for dairy farming, in Proceedings of the 75th Conference of the New Zealand Grassland Association, pp 79–84, New Zealand Grassland Association (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. V.K. Totty, S.L. Greenwood, R.H. Bryant, G.R. Edwards, J. Dairy Sci. 96, 1, 141–149, DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-5504 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Pol, K. Schimdtke, S. Lewandowska, Open Agric. 6, 479–488, DOI: 10.15.15/opag.2021’0035 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  6. A.V. Stewart, Plantain (Plantago lanceolata)-a potential pasture species, in Proceedings of the 58th Conference of the New Zealand Grassland Association, pp 77-86, New Zealand Grassland Association (1996) [Google Scholar]
  7. B. Mahanna, L.E. Chase, Silage Sci. Technol. 42, 855–895, DOI: 10.2134/agronmonogr42.c19 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  8. T.F. Bernardes, J.L.P. Daniel, A.T. Adesogan, T.A. McAllister, P. Drouin, L.G. Nussio, Y. Cai, J. Dairy Sci. 101, 4001–4019, DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-13703 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  9. Z.L. Xie, T.F. Zhang, X.Z. Chen, G.D. Li, J.G. Zhang, Asian-Australasian J. Anim. Sci. 25, 10, 1374, DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2012.12084 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  10. B.Z. Saricicek, B. Yildirim, Z. Kocabas, E.O. Demir, J. Inst. Sci. Tech. 6, 177–183 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  11. Z.G. Weinberg, Y. Chen, Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 185, 3–4, 196-200, DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.08.009 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Moran, Tropical dairy farming: feeding management for small holder dairy farmers in the humid tropics (CSIRO Publishing, Australia, 2005) [Google Scholar]
  13. G. Ashbell, T. Kipnis, M. Titterton, Y. Hen, A. Azrieli, Z. Weinberg, Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 91, 3, 213–222, DOI: 10.1016/S0377-8401(01)00239-5 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  14. M.J. Playne, P. McDonald, J. Sci. Food Agric. 17, 6, 264–268, DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.2740170609 (1966) [Google Scholar]
  15. AOAC, Fibre (Acid Detergent) and lignin in animal feed official methods of analysis (15th Edition) (Association of Official Analytical Chemists, DOI: 10.1016/0003-2670(91)87088-0, 1990) [Google Scholar]
  16. P.J. Van Soest, J.B. Robertson, B.A. Lewis, J. Dairy Sci. 74, 10, 3583–3597, DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2 (1991) [Google Scholar]
  17. C. Pollock, T. Jones, New Phytol. 83, 1, 9–15. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1979.tb00720.x (1979) [Google Scholar]
  18. Y. Tamura, S. Nishibe, Agric. Food Chem. 50, 2514–2518, DOI: 10.1021/jf011490x (2002) [Google Scholar]
  19. T. Clarke, P. Flinn, A. McGowan, Grass Forage Sci. 37, 2, 147–150, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1982.tb01590 (1982) [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Powell, P. Kemp, I. Jaya, M. Osborne, Establishment, growth and development of plantain and chicory under grazing, in Proceedings of the 76th Conference of the New Zealand grassland association, New Zealand Grassland Association (2007) [Google Scholar]
  21. K. Bolsen, G. Ashbell, Z. Weinberg, Asian-Australasian J. Anim. Sci. 9, 5, 483–494 (1996) [Google Scholar]
  22. R. Muck, K.J. Shinners, Conserved forage (silage and hay): progress and priorities, in Proceedings of the International Grassland Congress, Vol 19 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Jiang, R.H. Bryant, J. Jiao, R. Tung. New Zeal. J. Anim. Sci. Prod. 79, 174–176 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  24. G. Borreani, E. Tabacco, L. Cavallarin, J. Dairy Sci. 90, 10, 4701–4706, DOI: 10.3168/jds.2007-0310 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  25. J.M. Wilkinson, D.R. Davies, Grass Forage Sci. 68, 1–19, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2012.00891.x (2012) [Google Scholar]
  26. L. Kung, R. Shaver, Focus Forage. 3, 13, 1–5 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  27. J. Isselstein, P. Daniel, The ensilability of grassland forbs, in Grassland and land use systems, Proc. 16th Gen Meet. Europ. Grassl. Federation. Grado, Italy. 451–455 (1996) [Google Scholar]
  28. S. Navarrete, P.D. Kemp, S.J. Pain, P.J. Back. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 222, 158–167, DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsc1.2016.10.008 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  29. Z.G. Weinberg, R.E. Muck, FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 19, 1, 53–68, DOI: 10.1111/j1574-6976.1996.tb00253.x (1996) [Google Scholar]
  30. G. Pahlow, H. Honig, The role of microbial additives in the aerobic stability of silage, in Proceedings of the 15th General Meeting of EGF, 149–152, The Netherlands (1994) [Google Scholar]
  31. K.L. Blaxter, J. Dairy Sci. 39, 10, 1396–1424, DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(56)94865-2 (1956) [Google Scholar]
  32. CSIRO, Nutrient requirements of domesticated ruminants (CSIRO publishing, Collingwood VIC Australia, (2007) [Google Scholar]
  33. M. Castle, W. Retter, J. Watson, Grass Forage Sci. 35, 3, 219–225, DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1980.tb01515.x (1980) [Google Scholar]
  34. G.C. Waghorn, J.L. Burke, E.S. Kolver, Principles of feeding value, In Pasture and Supplements for Grazing Animals, 35–59 (New Zealand Society of Animal Production, New Zealand, 2007) [Google Scholar]
  35. M. Raeside, Z. Nie, J. Lamb, A. Byron, R. Behrendt, Nutritive value of silage from perennial ryegrass, plantain and lucerne pastures in South west Victoria, in Proceeding of the 16th Australian Agronomy Congress, Australian Agronomy (2012) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.