Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 309, 2021
3rd International Conference on Design and Manufacturing Aspects for Sustainable Energy (ICMED-ICMPC 2021)
Article Number 01194
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202130901194
Published online 07 October 2021
  1. CSI (2017) ETABS 2017 Integrated Building Design Software, Version 16.0.2. Computers and Structures, Inc., Berkeley. [Google Scholar]
  2. IS 13920 (1993) Ductile detailing of reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic forces—code of practice. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. [Google Scholar]
  3. IS 13920 (2016) Ductile design and detailing of reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic forces—code of practice. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. [Google Scholar]
  4. IS 1893 Part 1 (2002) Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, part 1: general provisions and buildings (fifth revision). Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. [Google Scholar]
  5. IS 1893 Part 1 (2016) Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, part 1: general provisions and buildings (sixth revision). Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. [Google Scholar]
  6. IS 456 (2000) Indian standard—plain and reinforced concrete, code of practice. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. [Google Scholar]
  7. IS 875 (Part 1) (1987) Indian standard—code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures (dead loads). Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. [Google Scholar]
  8. IS 875 (Part 2) (1987) Indian standard—code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures (live loads). Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. [Google Scholar]
  9. IS 875 (Part 3) (1987) Indian standard—code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures (live loads). Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. [Google Scholar]
  10. IS 875 (Part 3) (2015) Indian standard—code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) for buildings and structures (live loads). Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. [Google Scholar]
  11. Surana, M., Singh, Y., & Lang, D. H. (2018). Effect of strong-column weak-beam design provision on the seismic fragility of RC frame buildings. International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering, 10(2), 131–141. [Google Scholar]
  12. Adam, M. A., & El-Mohr, M. A. K. (2002, May). Effect of using different concrete strengths for columns and beams on the behaviour of building frames. In 4th International Conference on Civil & Architecture Engineering (Vol. 4). ICCAE Cairo. [Google Scholar]
  13. Wibowo, A., Wilson, J. L., Lam, N. T., & Gad, E. F. (2014). Drift capacity of lightly reinforced concrete columns. Australian Journal of Structural Engineering, 15(2), 131–150. [Google Scholar]
  14. Raheem, S. E. A. (2013). Evaluation of Egyptian code provisions for seismic design of moment-resisting-frame multi-story buildings. International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering, 5(1), 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  15. Tawfik, A. S., Badr, M. R., & ElZanaty, A. (2014). Behavior and ductility of high-strength reinforced concrete frames. HBRC Journal, 10(2), 215–221. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ramesh, V., & Srikanth, K. (2020). Mechanical Properties and Mix Design of Geopolymer concrete–A review. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 184, p. 01091). EDP Sciences. [Google Scholar]
  17. Koniki, S., & Prasad, D. R. (2019). Influence of hybrid fibres on strength and stress-strain behaviour of concrete under uni-axial stresses. Construction and Building Materials, 207, 238–248. [Google Scholar]
  18. Cotipalli, V., Srinivas, T., & Varma, V. N. K. (2021, July). Study on storey shear and base shear for irregular G+ 3, G+ 6 structures in seismic zones II and III erected on all three soils. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2358, No. 1, p. 090008). AIP Publishing LLC. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gunturi, M., Ravichandran, P. T., Annadurai, R., & Krishnan, K. D. (2014). Experimental study on strength properties of problematic soils with RBI–81 stabiliser. International Journal of Civil & Structural Engineering, 4(3), 441–449. [Google Scholar]
  20. Koniki, Srikanth, and D. Ravi Prasad. “Mechanical properties and constitutive stress– strain behaviour of steel fiber reinforced concrete under uni-axial stresses.” Journal of Building Pathology and Rehabilitation 4.1 (2019): 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  21. T. Srinivas and M. Abinay Raj, Int. J. of Eng.and Adv. Tech. (IJEAT), ISSN: 2249 – 8958, Volume-8 Issue-6 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  22. T. srinivas and P. Manoj Anand, Int. J. of Innov. Tech. and Explor. Eng.g (IJITEE), ISSN: 2278-3075, Volume-8 Issue-12 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  23. T. Srinivas and G. Sukesh Reddy, Int. J. of Eng.and Adv. Tech. (IJEAT), ISSN: 2249 – 8958, Volume-9 Issue-1 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  24. T. Srinivas and R. N. Koushik, Int. J. of Innov. Tech. and Explor. Eng.g (IJITEE), ISSN: 2278-3075, Volume-8 Issue-12 (2019), PP 112–117. [Google Scholar]
  25. K. Sai Gopi, Dr. T. Srinivas and S. P. Raju V, E3S Web of Conferences ICMED 184, 01084GRIET, 28–29 February, https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/2020184011084 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  26. Jagannadha Kumar, M.V., Jagannadha Rao, K., Dean Kumar, B., Srinivasa Reddy, V., Int. J. of Civil Eng. and Tech., 9(7), pp. 1133–1141 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  27. Ganta, J.K., Seshagiri Rao, M.V., Mousavi, S.S., Srinivasa Reddy, V., Bhojaraju, C., Structures 28, pp. 956–972 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  28. Naidu, K.S.S.T., Rao, M.V.S., Reddy, V.S., Int. J. of Innov. Tech. and Explor. Eng.g (IJITEE), 8(9 Special Issue 2), pp. 641–642 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  29. Chandana Priya, C., Seshagiri Rao, M.V., Srinivasa Reddy, V., Int. J. of Civil Eng. and Tech., 9(11), pp. 2218–2225 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  30. Satya Sai Trimurty Naidu, K., Seshagiri Rao, M.V., Srinivasa Reddy, V., Int. J. of Civil Eng. and Tech., 9(11), pp. 2383–2393 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  31. Supriya, Y., Srinivasa Reddy, V., Seshagiri Rao, M.V., Shrihari, S., Int. J. of Rec. Tech. and Engi., 8(3), pp. 5381–5385 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  32. Kotkunde, N., Krishna, G., Shenoy, S.K., Gupta, A.K., Singh, S.K. International Journal of Material Forming, 10 (2), pp. 255–266 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  33. Govardhan, D., Kumar, A.C.S., Murti, K.G.K., Madhusudhan Reddy, G. Materials and Design, 36, pp. 206–214. (2012) [Google Scholar]
  34. Kumar, P., Singhal, A., Mehta, S., Mittal, A. Journal of Real-Time Image Processing, 11 (1), pp. 93–109. (2016) [Google Scholar]
  35. Raghunadha Reddy, T., Vishnu Vardhan, B., Vijayapal Reddy, P. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 11 (5), pp. 3092–3102 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  36. Hussaini, S.M., Krishna, G., Gupta, A.K., Singh, S.K. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 18, pp. 151–158 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  37. Kumar, C. V., Parvez, M. A., & Srinivas, T. (2020). Strength Behaviour of Blended Self-Cured Concrete made with Cement by partial replacement of Supplementary Cementitious Materials (SCM’s). In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 184, p. 01100). EDP Sciences. [Google Scholar]
  38. Ramesh, V., & Srikanth, K. (2020). Mechanical Properties and Mix Design of Geopolymer concrete–A review. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 184, p. 01091). EDP Sciences. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.