EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 314 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 314 (2021) 05003 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 314, 2021
The 6th edition of the International Conference on GIS and Applied Computing for Water Resources (WMAD21)
Article Number 05003
Number of page(s) 10
Section Hydrology, Hydrogeology and Hydro-geophysics
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131405003
Published online 26 October 2021
  1. PDAIRE (Plan directeur d’aménagement intégré des ressources en eau). Agence Du Bassin Hydraulique Du Sebou (2011). [Google Scholar]
  2. Fenglei F.; Yingbin D.; Xuefei H. and Qihao W. Estimating Composite Curve Number Using an Improved SCS-CN Method with Remotely Sensed Variables in Guangzhou, China. Remote Sensing, ISSN 2072-4292 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  3. Mishra, S.K.; Singh, V.P. SCS-CN method. Part-I: Derivation of SCS-CN based models. Acta Geophy. Pol. 50, 457–477 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  4. Ponce, V.M.; Hawkins, R.H. Runoff curve number: Has it reached maturity? J. Hydrol. Eng. 1, 11–19 (1996). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hawkins, R.H.; Ward, T.J.; Woodward, D.E.; Van Mullem, J.A. Curve Number Hydrology: State of Practice; American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, VI, USA (2009). [Google Scholar]
  6. Mary, J.M. HER-hydrologic evaluation of runoff; the soil conservation service curve number technique as an interactive computer model. Computers & Geosciences, Vol. 21, no. 8 pp. 929-935 (1995). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Banasik K. Empirical determination of runoff curve number for a small agricultural watershed in Poland. 2nd Joint Federal Interagency Conference, Las Vegas, NV, June 27 July 1, 11p (2010). [Google Scholar]
  8. Xiao BO., Qing-Hai W. Application of the SCS-CN Model to Runoff Estimation in a Small Watershed with High Spatial Heterogeneity. Beijing Research & Development Center for Grass and Environment, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Pedosphere 21 (6): 738–749, 21p (2011). [Google Scholar]
  9. Mirsha S.K., Kansal A.K., Aggarwa N., 2012. Assessment of design runoff curve number for a watershed. Water Practice & Technology, Volume 7 No 4, 8p (2012). [Google Scholar]
  10. Ji-Hong J., Kyoung J., Bernard A., ENGEL. Regional Calibration of SCS-CN LTHIA Model: Application for Ungauged Basins. Water 6, 1339-1359, p21 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Giridhar M.V.S.S.; Viswanadh G.K. Runoff estimation in an ungauged watershed using RS and GIS. J. I. Ass. W. W. 9p (2014). [Google Scholar]
  12. Mishra, S.K.; Singh, V.P. SCS-CN method. Part-I: Derivation of SCS-CN based models. Acta Geophy. 50, 457–477 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  13. Usace, U.A.C.O. Hydrologic Modeling System, HEC-HMS. Quick Start Guide; US Army Corps of Engineers Institute for Water Resources Hydrologic Engineering Center: Davis, CA, USA, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  14. Gyozo J. Morphometric Analysis and Tectonic Interpretation of Terrain Data: a case study. Earth Surf. Process and Landforms 28, 807–822 (2003). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers. Geospatial hydrologic modeling extension, HEC-GeoHMS, user’s manual version 10. Davis, CA, USA (2010). [Google Scholar]
  16. Okirya M.; Albert R.; & Janka O. Application of Hec-Hms/Ras and GIS Tools in Flood Modeling: A Case Study for River Sironko. Global journal of engineering, design & technology. Vol. 1(2), pp. 19-31 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  17. USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, Technical Release 55, United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services, Conservation Engineering Division, Washington, DC, USA. Second Edition, June. 164p (1986). [Google Scholar]
  18. USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers, HEC-GeoHMS Geospatial Hydrologic Modeling Extension, Technical Reference Manual, Davis, CA 95616 USA, CPD-77, May (2009). [Google Scholar]
  19. Shadeed S., Almasri M. Application of GIS-based SCS-CN method in West Bank catchments, Palestine. Water Sci. and Eng. volume 3, 13p (2010). [Google Scholar]
  20. Chadli, K., Kirat, M., Laadoua, A. et al. Runoff modeling of Sebou watershed (Morocco) using SCS curve number method and geographic information system. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 2, 158 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mishra S.K., Singh V.P. Soil conservation service curve number (SCS-CN) methodology. Water Sci. and Tech. Library. Volume 42, 534p (2003). [Google Scholar]
  22. USDA SCS -Soil Conservation Service. National Engineering Handbook. Section 4. Hydrology. USDA SCS, Washington DC (1985). [Google Scholar]
  23. Feldman, A. Hydrologic Modeling System HEC-HMS technical reference manual. US Army Corps of Engineers. Hydrologic Engineering Center: Second St., Davis, CA 95616 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  24. USACE, U.A.C.O. Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS) application guide version 3.1.0. Institute for Water Resources, Davis, (2008). [Google Scholar]
  25. Banitt, A. Simulating a century of hydrographs e Mark Twain reservoir. In Proceeding of 2nd Joint Federal Interagency Conference, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 27 June–1 July (2010). [Google Scholar]
  26. Environmental and Water Resources Instit. Curve number hydrology: State of the practice. Hawkins, R.H., Ward, T.J., Woodward, D.E., Van Mullem, J.A., Eds; American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, VA, USA (2009). [Google Scholar]
  27. Sardoii, E.R.; Rostami, N.; Sigaroudi, S.K.; Taheri, S. Calibration of loss estimation methods in HEC-HMS for simulation of surface runoff (Case Study: Amirkabir Dam Watershed, Iran). Adv. Environ. Biol. 6, 343–348 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  28. McCarthy, G.T. The unit hydrograph and flood routing. In Proceedings of Conference of North Atlantic Division, Washington, WA, USA (1938). [Google Scholar]
  29. Birkhead, A.; James C. Muskingum river routing with dynamic bank storage. J. Hydrol. 264, 113–132 (2002). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Yusop, Z.; Chan, C.; Katimon, A. Runoff characteristics and application of HEC-HMS for modelling stormflow hydrograph in an oil palm catchment. Water Sci. Technol. 56, 41–48 (2007) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Azam, M.; San Kim, H.; Maeng, S.J. Development of flood alert application in Mushim stream watershed Korea. Int. J.Disast. Risk Re. 21, 11-26 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  32. Najim, M.M.M.; Babelb, M.S.; Loofb, R. AGNPS model assessment for a mixed forested watershed in Thailand. (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2006.32.053 [Google Scholar]
  33. Nash, J.E.; Sutcliffe, J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 10, 282–290 (1970). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Moriasi, D.N.; Arnold, J.G.; Van Liew, M.W.; Bingner, R.L.; Harmel, R.D.; Veith, T.L. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. T. ASABE. 50, 885–900 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Neter, J.; Wasserman, W.; Kutner, M.H. Applied statistical models. Richard D. Irwin, Inc.: Burr Ridge, IL, (1990). [Google Scholar]
  36. Cheng, C.-T.; Ou, C.; Chau, K. Combining a fuzzy optimal model with a genetic algorithm to solve multi-objective rainfall–runoff model calibration. J. Hydrol. 268, 72–86 (2002). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Zou, K.H.; Tuncali, K.; Silverman, S.G. Correlation and simple linear regression. Radiology 227, 617–628. (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Zelelew, D.G. Spatial mapping and testing the applicability of the curve number method for ungauged catchments in Northern Ethiopia. J. Soil Water Conserv. 5, 293–301 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  39. Hawkins, R.H. Asymptotic determination of runoff curve numbers from data. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 119, 334–345 (1993). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.