EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 316 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 316 (2021) 02006 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 316, 2021
2nd International Conference on Agribusiness and Rural Development (IConARD 2021)
Article Number 02006
Number of page(s) 18
Section Agricultural Economic
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131602006
Published online 05 November 2021
  1. Pandit, B.H. and Thapa, G.B. Who gains from non-timber forest products trading in the mountains of Nepal? In R. Uma Shaanker, Ankila J. Hiremath, Gladwin C. Joseph and Nitin D. Rai (eds.), Non-Timber Forest Products: Conservation, Management and Policy in the Tropics, Bangalore: Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment: 175-187 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  2. Warner, K., The vision and role of Community Forestry in sustainable development (1997) [Google Scholar]
  3. Chaudhary S., Chettri N., Uddin K., Khatri T.B., Dhakal M., Bajracharya B., Ning W. Implications of land cover change on ecosystems services and people’s dependency: A case study from the Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Nepal. Ecological Complexity 28: 200-211 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Qurniati R., Febryano I.G., Zulfiani D. How trust influence social capital to support collective action in agroforestry development? Biodiversitas 18(3): 1201-1206 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Widianingsih N.N., Theilade I., Pouliot M. 2016. Contribution of forest restoration to rural livelihoods and household income in Indonesia. Sustainability 8: 1-22 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  6. Langat D., Maranga E.K., Aboud A.A., CheboiWo J.K. Role of forest resources to local livelihoods: The case of East Mau forest ecosystem, Kenya. International Journal of Forestry Research vol. 2016: 1-10 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pokharel, B., and Nurse, M., Forest and peoples’ livelihoods: Benefiting the poor from community forestry. Journal of Forestry and Livelihoods 4 (1), 19-29 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  8. Banjade, M.R., Timsina, N.P., Neupane, H. R., Bhandari, K., Bhattrai, T., Rana, S. K., Transforming Agency and Structure for Facilitating Pro-Poor Governance in Community, Journal of Forest and Livelihood 5 (1), 22-33 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  9. Uprety, D.R., Community Forestry, rural livelihoods and conflict: A case study of CFUGs in Nepal. Ph.D. thesis, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria (2006) [Google Scholar]
  10. Chetri, R.B., Pandey, T.R., User-group forestry in the far western region of Nepal: case studies from Baitadi and Achham. ICIMOD, Kathmandu, Nepal (1994) [Google Scholar]
  11. Khanal, K.P., Economic Evaluation of Community Forestry in Nepal and its Equity Distribution Effect. M.Sc. Thesis Department of Economics and Natural Resources, Unit of Forestry. The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Denmark. (2001) [Google Scholar]
  12. Dahal, D.R., A review of FUG: a case studies from western Nepal. ICIMOD, Kathmandu, Nepal. [Google Scholar]
  13. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 41 Tahun 1999 Tentang Kehutanan [Google Scholar]
  14. Keputusan Menteri Kehutanan Nomor 88/Ktps-II/2003 Tahun 2003 tentang Kriteria Potensi Hutan Pada Hutan Produksi yang Dapat Dilakukan Pemanfaatan Hutan Secara Lestari. [Google Scholar]
  15. Susanto A., Triyono J. Cluster model of agroforestry land use to support food sustainability. Current Agriculture Research Journal 4(2): 143-147 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kiptot E., Franzel S., Degrande A. Gender, agroforestry and food security in Africa. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 6: 104-109 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  17. Coulibaly J.Y., Chiputwa B., Nakelse T., Kundhlande G. Adoption of agroforestry and the impact on household food security among farmers in Malawi. Agricultural Systems 155: 52-69 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Salampessy M.L., Febryano I.G., Zulfiani D. Principal agent in tree mortgage system on traditional agroforestry management in Moluccas Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 285 (012013): 1-5 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mbow C., Noordwijk M.V., Luedeling E., Neufeldt H., Minang P.A., KoWero G. Agroforestry solutions to address food security and climate change challenges in Africa. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 6: 61-67 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Noordwijk M.V., Bizard V., Wangpakapattanawong P., Tata H.L., Villamor G.B., Leimona, B. Tree cover transitions and food security in Southeast Asia. Global Food Security 3: 200-208 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jamnadass R., Place F., Torquebiau E., Malézieux, E., Iiyama, M., Sileshi G.W. Agroforestry for food and nutritional security. Unasylva 64: 23-29 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  22. Vira B., Wildburger C., Mansourian S. Forests and Food: Addressing Hunger and Nutrition across Sustainable Landscapes. Open Book Publishers, Cambridge. 280 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  23. Alao J.S., Shuaibu R.B. Agroforestry practices and concepts in sustainable land use systems in Nigeria. Journal of Horticulture and Forestry 5(10): 156-159 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  24. El-Tantawi A.M., Badr A.M., Daura U.S. Benefits of agroforestry on smallholder farms in Jigawa State, Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology 11: 31-38 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Oino P., Mugure A. Farmer-oriented factors that influence adoption of agroforestry practices in Kenya: Experiences from Nambale District, Busia County. International Journal of Science and Research 2(4): 442-449 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  26. Mugiono, I., Penyusunan Database Hutan Rakyat di Pulau Jawa (Sebagai Prakondisi Implementasi Sistem Legalitas Kayu dan Rencana Proyek Karbon)”. Workshop, Yogyakarta: Sahid-raya Hotel. (2009) [Google Scholar]
  27. Hastari B., Yulianti R. Pemanfaatan dan nilai ekonomi hasil hutan bukan kayu di KPHL Kapuas-Kahayan [Utilization and economy value of non-timber forest product in KPHL Kapuas-Kahayan]. Jurnal Hutan Tropis 6(2): 145-153 (in Indonesian) (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nurapriyanto I., Bahruni, Basuni S. Nilai ekonomi buah, kayu bakar dan air di Hutan Lindung Wosi Rendani (economic value of fruit, firewood and water in Wosi Rendani’s forest.) Jurnal Faloak 2(2): 115-126 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  29. Jahanifar K., Amirnejad H., Abedi Z., Vafaeinejad A. Estimation of the value of forest ecosystem services to develop conservational strategy management (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats). Journal of Forest Science 63(7): 300-312 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kadir Z.A. Penilaian Ekonomi Lanskap Agroforestri sebagai Jasa Lingkungan di Daerah Aliran Sungai Krueng Aceh [Agroforestry Landscape Economic Valuation as An Environmental Service in The Krueng Aceh River Basin]. Tesis. Sekolah Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, 91 p. (in Indonesian). (2014) [Google Scholar]
  31. Naidoo R. Economics and conservation in the tropics: A strategic dialogue. The role of economic valuation in the conservation of tropical nature. Conference Paper. Conservation Science Program, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Resources for the future: 1-6 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  32. Jilkova J., Hollander R., Kochmann L., Slavik J., Slavikova. Economic valuation of environmental resources and its use in local policy decision-making - A comparative Czech-German border study. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 1-13 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  33. Tegenie Y.A. Economic Valuation and Sustainable Natural Resources Management: Review Paper. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development 6(7): 199-204 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  34. Kuncoro, M., Metode Riset untuk Bisnis dan Ekonomi. 4th ed. Jakarta: Erlangga (2013) [Google Scholar]
  35. Sevilla, C. G., Research Methods. Quezon City: Rex Printing Company. (2007) [Google Scholar]
  36. Wildayana, Valuasi Ekonomi Konversi Hutan Sekunder ke Usahatani Lahan Kering di Kecamatan Muara Enim Sumatera Selatan. Tesis. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor (1999) [Google Scholar]
  37. UMHR Wono Lestari Bantul, Unit Manajemen Hutan Rakyat Wono Lestari Bantul. (2017) [Google Scholar]
  38. Yulian, E. N., Valuasi Sumberdaya Alam Taman Hutan Raya Bukit Soeharto Di Provinsi Kalimantan Timur. Tesis. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor (2010) [Google Scholar]
  39. Firdaus, H., Nilai Ekonomi Total dan Analisis Multistakeholder Hutan Rakyat Di Kecamatan Giriwoyo, Kabupaten Wonogiri, Jawa Tengah. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor.(2013) [Google Scholar]
  40. Thoha, A. S., Peluang Hutan Komunitas dan Perdagangan Karbon. [Online] Available at: www.latin.or.id/index.php-redd/44-peluang-hutan-komunitas-dan-perdagangan-karbon.html [Accessed 23 October 2020], (2013) [Google Scholar]
  41. Ariftia, R. I., Qurniati, A. R. & Herwanti, S., Nilai Ekonomi Total Hutan Mangrove Desa Margasari Kecamatan Maringgai Kabupaten Lampung Timur. Journal of Suistainable Forest, Volume II (2014) [Google Scholar]
  42. Disdukcapil Kabupaten Bantul, Data Kependudukan Berdasarkan Kartu Keluarga (KK), [Online] Available at: https://disdukcapil.bantulkab.go.id/data/list/23/24/41-data-kependudukan-dak2 [Accessed 2 January 2020], (2017) [Google Scholar]
  43. Z. Rozaki, N. Rahmawati, O. Wijaya, A. F. Mubarok, M. Senge, and M. F. Kamarudin, A case study of agroforestry practices and challenges in Mt. Merapi risk and hazard prone area of Indonesia, Biodiversitas 22, 2511 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  44. Z. Rozaki, N. Rahmawati, O. Wijaya, F. Safitri, M. Senge, and M. F. Kamarudin, Gender perspectives on agroforestry practices in Mt. Merapi hazards and risks prone area of Indonesia, Biodiversitas 22, 2980 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  45. B. Winarno, Neoliberal Policy of Indonesia’s Agricultural Revitalization, Jurnal Hubungan Internasional 5, 31 (2016) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.