Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 316, 2021
2nd International Conference on Agribusiness and Rural Development (IConARD 2021)
Article Number 02016
Number of page(s) 19
Section Agricultural Economic
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131602016
Published online 05 November 2021
  1. [KEMENTAN] Kementerian Pertanian, Outlook Bawang Putih Komoditas Pertanian Sub Sektor Hortikultura, Pusat Data dan Sistem Informasi Pertanian. Kementerian Pertanian. Jakarta, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  2. Cancino CALa Paz AI, Ramaprasad A, Syn T, Technological innovation for sustainable growth: An ontological perspective, Journal of Cleaner Production 179: 3141, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  3. Gherardini, F., Renzi, C., Leali, F., A systematic user-centred framework for engineering product design in small- and medium-sized enteIDRrises (SMEs), International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 91(5-8): 1723-1746, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  4. Maheshwari, S., Vohra, V., Identifying critical HR practices impacting employee perception and commitment during organizational change, Journal of Organizational Change Management 28(5): 872-894, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  5. Ibidunni A.S., Salau O.P., Falola H.O., Ayeni A.W., Obunabor F.I., Total quality management and performance of telecommunication firms, International Business Management 11(2): 293-298, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  6. Zakuan N.M., Yusof S.M., Laosirihhongthong T., Shaharoun, A.M., Proposed relationship of TQM and organizational performance using structured equation modelling, Total Quality Management and Business Excellence 21(2): 185-203, (2010) [Google Scholar]
  7. [UNIDO] United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Global value chains and development, New York (US): UNIDO Publishing, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  8. [WTO] World Trade Organization, Global value chain development report 2017: measuring and analyzing the impact of GVCs on economic development, Washington DC (US): World Bank Publishing, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  9. World Bank, World development report 2020: trading for development in The age of global value chains, Washington DC (US): World Bank Publishing, (2019) [Google Scholar]
  10. Krisnamurthi B., Perdagangan Internasional Dan Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan (Trade and Sustainable Development Goals/SDGS), Makalah disampaikan pada Webinar Berseri WTO dan Analisis Kebijakan Perdagangan Kerjasama ITAPS-IE FEM IPB-ISEI Bogor Raya Kementerian Perdagangan-UNIED 12 Juni 2020, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  11. Banga, R., Measuring Value in Global Value Chains. Unit of Economic Cooperation and Integration amongst Developing Countries (ECIDC) UNCTAD, Background Paper No. RVC-8, (2013) [Google Scholar]
  12. Gereffi G., Stark K.F., Global value chain analysis: a Primer, Center on globalization, governances and competitiveness, The Social Science Research Institute, (2016) [Google Scholar]
  13. de Groot, N.S.P., Floriculture Worldwide Trade And Consumption Patterns, World Confference on Horticulture Research, ISHS. 17-20 June 1998 in Rome, Italy, (1998) [Google Scholar]
  14. Simatupang, P., The Conception of Domestic Resource Cost and Net Economic Benefit for Comparative Advantage Analysis, Agribusiness Division Working Paper N0. 2/91, Centre for Agro-Socioeconomic Research, Bogor, (1991) [Google Scholar]
  15. Friyatno S., Saptana. Kinerja agribisnis komoditas pertanian: kemampuan penciptaan output, nilai tambah dan keterkaitan antar sektor (analisis komparasi I-O tahun 2005 dan 2010). Jurnal Manajemen & Agribisnis 4 (3):250-263, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  16. Lindert, P. H. dan Ch. P. Kindleberger, Ekonomi Internasional (Alih Bahasa Burhanuddin Abdullah) Edisi Kedelapan. Penerbit Erlangga Jakarta, (1993) [Google Scholar]
  17. Esterhuizen, Dirk, J.V. Royen and Luc D’Haese, Determinan of Competitiveness in The South African Agro-Food Fibre Complex. University of Pretoria, (2006) [Google Scholar]
  18. Ma, A. S., Revealed Comparative Advantage Measure: ASEAN-China Trade Flows, Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 4(7), 136-145, (2013) [Google Scholar]
  19. Krugman, Paul R. Dan M. Obstfeld, Ekonomi Internasional Teori dan Kebijakan. Edisi Kedua, Universitas Indonesia dan HasperCollins Publishers, (1994) [Google Scholar]
  20. Salvatore, Dominick, Ekonomi Internasional, (Erlangga, Jakarta, 1994) [Google Scholar]
  21. Esterhuizen, Dirk, J.V. Royen and Luc D’Haese, An Evaluation of The Competitiveness Sector in South Africa, Advanced in Competitiveness Research 16(1-2), 31-46, (2008) [Google Scholar]
  22. Sharples J., N. Milham. Long Run Competitiveness of Australian Agriculture. United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Competitiveness of Service, Foreign Agricultural Australian Agriculture Economic Report Number 243, Reproduced by U.S. Departement of Commerce National Technical Information Service SPRINGFIELD VA 22761, (1990) [Google Scholar]
  23. Cook, M. Bredahl, M.E., Agri-business competitiveness in 1990s: Discussion, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol.73 (December), pp. 1472, (1991) [Google Scholar]
  24. Van Dung, B., Van Hoang T.T., Anh Ho T.T., Le Ho T.T., Concepts of Agri-Competitiveness in Theorical and Imperical Research, Journal of Development Research, 4 (1), May 2020, Page 24-33, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  25. Rachman H.P.S., Supriyati, Saptana, Rachman, B., Efisiensi daya saing usaha tani hortikultura. 2004. Dalam: Prosiding Efisiensi dan Daya Saing Sistem Usaha Tani Beberapa Komoditas Pertanian di Lahan Sawah. Bogor: Pusat Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian; p. 50-82. ISBN 979-3566-22-1, (2004) [Google Scholar]
  26. Saptana, Mayrowani H., Friyatno, S., Daya saing komoditas bawang putih dan cabai merah di Simalungun Sumatera Utara, Jurnal Agribisnis dan Industri Pertanian, Vol. 3(1):1-12, (2004) [Google Scholar]
  27. Saptana, Tinjauan konseptual mikro-makro daya saing dan strategi pembangunan pertanian, Jurnal Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi, Vol. 28(1):1-18, (2010) [Google Scholar]
  28. Tufail, Sadia, Comparative Advantage of Major Crops in Punjab-Pakistan: An Application of Policy Analysis Matrix. M. Phil. A thesis submitted to the Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science and Technology, Islamabad, (2014) [Google Scholar]
  29. Salam, A., S. Tufail. Competittiveness and Comparative Advantage of Important Food and Industrial Crops in Punjab: Application of Policy Analysis Matrix, Journal of International Agricultural Trade And Development, Volume 10, Number 1, page:81-94, (2016) [Google Scholar]
  30. Saptana, Hermanto, Sativa, M., Senoadji, T., Gabriella, S., Arrozy A.M., et al., Pemetaan dan Reviu Proses Bisnis Perencanaan Wilayah Hortikultura (Komoditas Bawang putih), Jakarta: Biro Perencanaan, Kementerian Pertanian; 181 p. ISBN 978-623-747060-1, (2019) [Google Scholar]
  31. Monke, E.A. dan Pearson, S.R., The Policy Analysis Matrix for Agricultural Development, (Cornel University Press, Ithaca and London, 1989) [Google Scholar]
  32. Monke, Eric A. and Scott R. Pearson, The Policy Analysis Matrix for Agricultural Development, (Cornel University Press, Ithaca and London, 1995) [Google Scholar]
  33. Pearson, Scott; Gotsch, Carl and Bahri, Sjaful, Application of The Policy Analysis Matrix in Indonesian Agriculture, (Yayasan Obor Indonesia, Jakarta, 2004) [Google Scholar]
  34. Dipokusumo, B., Studi Keunggulan Kompatarif dan Kompetitif Komoditas Bawang Putih dan Dampak Kebijakan Pemerintah Terhadap Pengembangannya Di Kabupaten Lombok Timur, Agrimansion, Vol. 5 No. 01; November 2004: 35-46, (2004) [Google Scholar]
  35. Kadariah, Lien Karlina dan Clive Gray, Pengantar Evaluasi Proyek. Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, (1978) [Google Scholar]
  36. Gittinger, J.P., Analisis Ekonomi Proyek-Proyek Pertanian Edisi 1986 (Terjemahan), (Universitas Indonesia Press, Jakarta, 1986) [Google Scholar]
  37. Kiloes A.M., Hardiyanto, Kelayakan Usahatani Bawang Putih di Berbagai Tingkat Harga Output (Feasibility of Garlic Farming at Various Price Levels of Output). J. Hort. Vol. 29 No. 2, Desember 2019: 231-240, (2019) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.