Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 316, 2021
2nd International Conference on Agribusiness and Rural Development (IConARD 2021)
Article Number 04007
Number of page(s) 9
Section Rural Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131604007
Published online 05 November 2021
  1. S. Ekawati, K. Budiningsih, Sylviani., Kajian tinjauan kritis pengelolaan hutan di Pulau Jawa. B. Puspijak 9, 1 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  2. C. Kubitzaa, V. Krishnaa, K. Urbanc, Z. Alamsyahd, M Qaim. Ecological Economics. 147 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  3. H. Kaskoyo, A.J. Mohammed, M Inoue. JFS. 30, 1 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Widiyanto. IJFR. 6, 1 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  5. N. Peluso., & J. Ribot, Postscript: A Theory of Access Revisited, Society & Natural Resources. 33, 2 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  6. P. Narh, Land Sector Reforms in Ghana, Kenya and Vietnam: A Comparative Analysis of Their Effectiveness. Land. 5 8 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  7. V. Krebs, Social Network Analysis, A Brief Introduction. 2009. [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Wasserman, K. Faust K. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press (1994). [Google Scholar]
  9. T. Müller-Prothman, Leveraging Knowledge Communication for Innovation: Framework, Methods and Applications of Social Network Analysis in Research and Development, Wien: Peterlang, (2006). [Google Scholar]
  10. S.A. Awang, Panduan Pemberdayaan Lembaga Masyarakat Desa Hutan (LMDH). Montpellier, France: French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development (CIRAD), Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), dan Yogyakarta, Indonesia: PKHR Fakultas Kehutanan UGM (2008). [Google Scholar]
  11. E.N. Muange,; Schwarze, Stefan; Qaim, Matin, Social networks and farmer exposure to improved crop varieties in Tanzania, GlobalFood Discussion Papers, No. 45, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  12. IFAD, Revised Approach Paper Smallholder Access to Markets (SAM) Evaluation Synthesis (2015). [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Magesa, M. Kisangiri and J. Ko, Access and use of agricultural market information by smallholder farmers: Measuring informational capabilities, EJISDC (2020). [Google Scholar]
  14. L.A. Hoang, J.C. Castella, P. Novosad, Social networks and information access: Implications for agricultural extension in a rice farming community in northern Vietnam, Agriculture and Human Value (2006). [Google Scholar]
  15. H. Markelova, R. Meinzen-Dick, Collective action for smallholder market access. CGIAR (2009). [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Milgroom, K. Giller dan C. Leeuwis, Three Interwooven Dimensions of Natural Resource Use: Quantity, Quality and Access in The Great Limpopo Transfrontier Conservation Area. Human Ecology (2014). [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Napitu, Hidayat dan S. Sjaf, Mekanisme Akses pada Hak Kepemilikan di Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan Produksi Meranti Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol. 14 No. 2, 2017: 101-118 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Scott, Social network analysis. Sage Publication (2017). [Google Scholar]
  19. Eriyanto, Analisis Jaringan Komunikasi. Jakarta: Kencana (2014). [Google Scholar]
  20. Tridakusumah et al., IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. Ill012002 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  21. E.M. Everret, D.L. Kincaid. 1981. Communication Networks. Toward a New Paradigm for Reseach. New York: The Free Press. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.