Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 316, 2021
2nd International Conference on Agribusiness and Rural Development (IConARD 2021)
Article Number 04019
Number of page(s) 17
Section Rural Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131604019
Published online 05 November 2021
  1. Surwandono, S. Jatmika, A. Maksum. 2019. “An Early Warning Information System for Social and Religious Conflict in Yogyakarta, Indonesia.” The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social and Community Studies 14 (1): 37-47. doi: 10.18848/2324-7576/CGP/v14i01/37-47. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. S.F. Haryanto, “Pemilikan Hak Milik Atas Tanah Bagi WNI Keturunan Tionghoa di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta”, Jurnal Hukum Tanah di DIY, 19, Vol. 1, No. 1, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  3. Walujono, Amanda, “The Discrimination of the Ethnic Chinese in Indonesia and Perceptions of Nationality”, Scholarship Claremont Scripps Senior Theses, 25, 508, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  4. F. Anshari, “Racism and Discrimination on Indonesian Sport (How Online Sports-Themed Media Should Apply Social Responsibility to Stop Sara Discrimination)”, Univ Pancasila, 10, Vol. 3, No. 1, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Soekanto, S. Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Suatu Tujuan Singkat), Jakarta, Rajawali Pers, 39, (2001). [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Ibrahim, Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Malang, Bayu Media, 34, (2006). [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Fajar, Y. Ahmad, 2013, Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normative dan Empiris, Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar, page 118. [Google Scholar]
  8. K.T. Slamet, “Constitutional Court and The Right To Be Free From Discriminatory Treatment”, Journal Konstitusi, 23, Vol. 12, No. 1, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  9. A.K. Sri, “Analisis Kritis dan Implementasi Undang-Undang No. 13 tahun 2012 tentang Keistimewaan Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Dalam Bidang Pertanahan, dalam jurnal bhumi Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan”, 37, Vol. 1, No. 1, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  10. J.N. Martin, T.K. Nakayama, Intercultural Communication in Contexts, Fifth Edition, McGraw-Hill, USA, 40, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Endang, “Mengkritisi Diskriminasi Pemilikan Tanah di Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta”, Hukum Pidana dan Pembangunan Hukum, 14, Vol. 1, No. 1, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  12. Handoko, Gubernur Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 13/P/HUM/2015. [Google Scholar]
  13. B. Setyagraha V Kantor Pertanahan Bantul, Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara pada Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Yogyakarta Nomor 11/G/TUN/2000/PTUN.YK.JO. [Google Scholar]
  14. L. Ratih, “Kebijakan Pertanahan Bagi WNI Keturunan Tionghoa Di Yogyakarta: Diskriminasi atau Diskriminasi Positif“, Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 34, Vol. 1, No. 1, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  15. T.S. Sekar V, “Problematika Surat Intruksi Kepala Daerah Nomor K.898/I/A/75 Tentang Penyeragaman Policy Pemberian Hak Atas Tanah Kepada Seorang WNI Non Pribumi di Yogyakarta”, Program Magister (S2) Ilmu Hukum di Universitas Islam Indonesia, 23, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  16. I. Adriani, (2015). ASEAN and Ongoing wal Conflicts. Jurnal Hubungan International, 3(2), 159-166. [Google Scholar]
  17. H. Herdiansyah, Pengelolaan Konflik Sumber Daya Alam Terbarukan di Perbatasan dalam Pendekatan Ekologi Politik, Jurnal Hubungan International, Vol 7, No. 2, (2019) [Google Scholar]
  18. F. Frans, 2018, “Telaah Yuridis Terhadap Intruksi Kepala Daerah Propinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarya Nomor K/898/I/1975 Tentang Penyeragaman Policy Pemberian Hak Atas Tanah Kepada Seorang WNI Non Pribumi”, Unissula Institutional Repository, 24, Vol. 1, No. 2, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Kanas, P. Scheepers, C. Sterkens, Interreligious Contact, Perceived Group Threat, and Perceived Discrimination: Predicting Negative Attitudes among Religious Minorities and Majorities in Indonesia, Sage Journals, 32, Vol. 78, No. 2, (2015). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.