EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 317 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 317 (2021) 01080 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 317, 2021
The 6th International Conference on Energy, Environment, Epidemiology, and Information System (ICENIS 2021)
Article Number 01080
Number of page(s) 13
Section Culture and Environment
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131701080
Published online 05 November 2021
  1. L. Arlym and D. Hermon, “Strategy of ecotourism development in Pariaman City,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., Vol. 314, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/314/1/012039. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. S. R. Sari, E. P. Hendro, and M. F. Hilmy, “Maintaining sustainability of tourism kampong. The case of kampong pelangi in semarang,” J. Environ. Manag. Tour., Vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 331–340, 2020, doi: 10.14505/jemt.v11.2(42).11. [Google Scholar]
  3. Pemerintah Kota Semarang, “Semarang Satu Data: Jumlah Kunjungan Wisatawan,” semarsatata.semarangkota.go.id, 2020. https://semarsatata.semarangkota.go.id/data/list/4 (accessed Feb. 24, 2021). [Google Scholar]
  4. U. D. E. Noviyanti, N. E. Suriyani, A. Umardiono, N. E. Suharno, and S. E. N. Hidayati, “Development of kampung tourism Lawas Maspati as the prominent destination in Surabaya, Indonesia,” African J. Hosp. Tour. Leis., Vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1–15, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  5. M. A. Yusuf, R. R. Ari, R. Kisnarini, D. Septanti, and H. R. Santosa, “Planning for sustainable tourism. case study: kampung of cookies, Surabaya, Indonesia,” J. Settlements Spat. Plan., Vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 49–60, 2019, doi: 10.24193/JSSP.2019.1.05. [Google Scholar]
  6. Isdarmanto, Dasar-Dasar Kepariwisataan dan Pengelolaan Destinasi Pariwisata. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Purnomo, E. S. Rahayu, A. L. Riani, S. Suminah, and U. Udin, “Empowerment model for sustainable tourism village in an emerging country,” J. Asian Financ. Econ. Bus., Vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 261–270, 2020, doi: 10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no2.261. [Google Scholar]
  8. A. G. Asmelash and S. Kumar, “Assessing progress of tourism sustainability: Developing and validating sustainability indicators,” Tour. Manag., Vol. 71, pp. 67–83, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2018.09.020. [Google Scholar]
  9. Pemerintah Kota Semarang, “Kampung Tematik,” http://gerbanghebat.semarangkota.go.id/home/hal-tematik/1. (2017) [Google Scholar]
  10. Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  11. N. A. Arifiani and M. Mussadun, “Studi persepsi masyarakat terhadap tingkat keberlanjutan wilayah pesisir Kecamatan Sarang,” J. Wil. dan Lingkung., Vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 171–186, doi: 10.14710/jwl.4.3.171-186. (2016) [Google Scholar]
  12. F. V. Uzun and M. Somuncu, “Evaluation of the sustainability of tourism in Ihlara Valley and suggestions,” Eur. J. Sustain. Dev., Vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 165–174, doi: 10.14207/ejsd.2015.v4n2p165. (2015) [Google Scholar]
  13. S. D. Rajaratnam, V. Nair, S. Pahlevan Sharif, and U. T. Munikrishnan, “Destination quality and tourists’ behavioural intentions: rural tourist destinations in Malaysia,” Worldw. Hosp. Tour. Themes, Vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 463–472, doi: 10.1108/WHATT-06-2015-0026. (2015) [Google Scholar]
  14. T. Flew and K. Kirkwood, “The impact of COVID-19 on cultural tourism: art, culture and communication in four regional sites of Queensland, Australia,” Media Int. Aust., Vol. 178, no. 1, pp. 16–20, doi: 10.1177/1329878X20952529. (2021) [Google Scholar]
  15. Y. A. Wibowo and L. Ronggowulan, “Potential analysis and community-based sustainable tourism development strategy (a case of kampung menjing, sukoharjo regency, central java, indonesia),” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., Vol. 683, no. 1, pp. 1–13, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/683/1/012112. (2021) [Google Scholar]
  16. L. Moreno-Luna, R. Robina-Ramírez, M. S. O. Sánchez, and J. Castro-Serrano, “Tourism and sustainability in times of covid-19: The case of Spain,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, Vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1–22, doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041859. (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. D. Azhari, A. Rosyidie, S. Sagala, A. Ramadhani, and J. F. Karistie, “Achieving sustainable and resilient tourism: Lessons learned from Pandeglang tourism sector recovery,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., Vol. 704, no. 1, pp. 1–12, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/704/1/012007. (2021) [Google Scholar]
  18. G. D. Sharma, A. Thomas, and J. Paul, “Reviving tourism industry post-COVID-19: A resilience-based framework” Tour. Manag. Perspect., Vol. 37, no. December 2020, p. 100786, doi: 10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100786. (2021) [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Št’Astná, A. Vaishar, J. Brychta, K. Tuzová, J. Zloch, and V. Stodolová, “Cultural tourism as a driver of rural development. Case study: Southern Moravia,” Sustain., Vol. 12, no. 21, pp. 1–16, doi: 10.3390/su12219064. (2020) [Google Scholar]
  20. P. Kunasekaran, S. S. Gill, S. Ramachandran, A. Shuib, T. Baum, and S. H. M. Afandi, “Measuring sustainable indigenous tourism indicators: A case of Mah Meri ethnic group in Carey Island, Malaysia,” Sustain., Vol. 9, no. 7, doi: 10.3390/su9071256. (2017) [Google Scholar]
  21. S. S. Wachyuni and D. A. Kusumaningrum, “The Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic: How are the Future Tourist Behavior?,” J. Educ. Soc. Behav. Sci., Vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 67–76, doi: 10.9734/jesbs/2020/v33i430219. (2020) [Google Scholar]
  22. D. M. Lemy, A. Pramezwary, F. Teguh, and R. Pramono, “How sustainable is our destination? A snap-shot from the first Indonesia sustainable tourism destination award,” African J. Hosp. Tour. Leis., Vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–17, (2019) [Google Scholar]
  23. Y. Kristiana, R. Pramono, and R. Brian, “Adaptation Strategy of Tourism Industry Stakeholders During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study in Indonesia,” J. Asian Financ. Econ. Bus., Vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 0213–0223, 2021, doi: 10.13106/jafeb. vol8.no4.0213. (2021) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.