Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 317, 2021
The 6th International Conference on Energy, Environment, Epidemiology, and Information System (ICENIS 2021)
Article Number 05026
Number of page(s) 8
Section Information System Management and Environment
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131705026
Published online 05 November 2021
  1. Cabrera, A., Cabrera, et al., The Key Role of Organizational Culture in a Multi-System View of Technology-Driven Change, International Journal of Information.Vol.21, num.3, p.245-261.Elsevier.ISSN 0268–4012 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  2. Standish Report, Chaos Manifesto 2013, (2013) [Google Scholar]
  3. Claver, E, Llopis, J, Gonzalez, The performance of Information Systems Through Organizational Culture, Information Technology & People, vol. 14,-260.no 3, pp.247 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  4. IBM Institute for Business Value, Global Change Management Study, Making Change Work, IBM-USA (2008) [Google Scholar]
  5. Lamb, Roberta; Kling, R., Reconceptualizing Users as Social Actors in Information Systems Research, MIS Quarterly; 27(2) (2003) [Google Scholar]
  6. Dorothy E. Leidner and Timothy Kayworth, Review: A Review of Culture in Information Systems Research: Toward a Theory of Information Technology Culture Conflict, MIS Quarterly 30(2):357–399 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  7. Yi Zhou, Jianliang Wei, Fei Meng, and Fen Jiang, Influential Factors and User Behavior of Mobile Reading, Journal of Intelligent Systems, 24(2): 223–234 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  8. Lisa Rosiana, Musa Hubeis, Eko Ruddy Cahyadi, Factors Affecting User Behavior of Technology Application of Management Information System, Indonesian Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, Vol.6 No. 3, September (2020) [Google Scholar]
  9. Wanyama G. Indeje, Qin Zheng, Organizational Culture and Information Systems Implementation: A Structuration Theory Perspective, AIS eLibrary (2010) [Google Scholar]
  10. Siti Mardiana, Jann Hidajat Tjakraatmadja, Atik Aprianingsih, How Organizational Culture Affects Information System Success: The Case of an Indonesia IT-Based Company, Journal of Information Systems Engineering, and Business Intelligence, Vol.4, No.2, October (2018) [Google Scholar]
  11. Danar Retno Sari, Teduh Dirgahayu, Pengaruh Dimensi Budaya Terhadap Perilaku Penggunaan E-commerce: Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, INTENSIF, UNP Jogjakarta (2018) [Google Scholar]
  12. Vajehe Rahmati, Soheila Darouian, Hamed Ahmadinia A, Review on Effect of Culture, Structure, Technology, and Behavior on Organizations, Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences (2012) [Google Scholar]
  13. Lee Cronk, Culture’s Influence on Behavior: Steps Toward a Theory, Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, Vol.11, No. 1, 36 –52 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  14. Tianya LI, Organizational Culture & Employee Behavior, Bachelor’s Thesis in Business Information Technology, Spring (2015) [Google Scholar]
  15. Joseph Henrich, Culture and Social Behavior, Science Direct, 3:84–89 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  16. Larsson, R., Case survey methodology: quantitative analysis of patterns across case studies, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol.36 No. 6, pp. 1515–1546 (1993) [Google Scholar]
  17. Petticrew, M; Roberts, H, Systematic reviews–do they work in informing decision-making around health inequalities? Health economics, policy, and law, 3 (Pt 2). pp. 197–211 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  18. HM, Jogiyanto, Sistem Informasi Keperilakuan, Ed. 1, Penerbit Andi, Jogjakarta (2007) [Google Scholar]
  19. Beaudry, A.; Vaghefi, I., Lapointe, L. & Bagayogo, F., Impacts of IT User Behavior: Observations Through A New Lens, AIS Journal, vol. 46 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  20. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I., Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1975) [Google Scholar]
  21. Davis FD, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly 13(3), 319–340 (1989) [Google Scholar]
  22. Ajzen, I., The Theory of Planned Behavior: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, (50:2), pp. 179–211 (1991) [Google Scholar]
  23. Taylor, S., &Todd, P, Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior: A study of consumer adoption intentions, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12, 137–155 (1995) [Google Scholar]
  24. Taylor S, and Todd PA, Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models, Information Systems Research 6(2), 144–176 (1995) [Google Scholar]
  25. Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C.A, and Howell, J. M, PersonalComputing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization, MIS Quarterly (15:1), pp.124–143 (1991) [Google Scholar]
  26. Compeau DR and Higgins CA, Application of the Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer (1995) [Google Scholar]
  27. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, and Davis FD, User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View, MIS Quarterly 27(3), 425–478 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  28. Beaudry A and Pinsonneault A, Understanding User Responses to Information Technology: A Coping Model of User Adaptation, MIS Quarterly 29(3), 493–524 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  29. Barki, H., and Hartwick, J. M., User Participation and User Involvement in Information System Development, Proceedings of Hawaiian International Conference on the System Science, pp. 487–492 (1991) [Google Scholar]
  30. Javerpaa, S. L., and Ives, B., Executive Involvement and Participation in The Management of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly, pp.205–226 (1991) [Google Scholar]
  31. Goodhue, D. L, and Thompson, R. L.,Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance, MIS Quarterly (09:2), pp. 213–236 (1995) [Google Scholar]
  32. Dishaw, M. T., Strong, D.M, Extending the Technology Acceptance Model with Task-technology Fit Constructs, Information, and Management (36:1), pp. 9–21 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  33. Dishaw, M. T., Strong, D.M., Brandy D. B, Extending the Task-technology Fit Model with Self-Efficacy Constructs, in Proceedings of the 8th Americas on Information System, R. Ramsower and J. Windsor (Eds), Dallas, TX, pp. 1021–1027 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  34. Goodhue, D.L., Understanding User Evaluations of Information System, Management Science (41:12), pp. 1827–1844 (1995) [Google Scholar]
  35. Zigurs, I, Buckland, B.K, A Theory of Task-Technology Fit and Group Support System Effectiveness, MIS Quarterly, (22:2), pp. 313–334 (1998) [Google Scholar]
  36. Zigurs, I, Buckland, B.K, Connolly, J.R., Wilson, E.V., A Test of Task-Technology Fit Theory for Group Support Systems, The Database for Advances in Information System (30:3,4), Summer-Fall, pp. 34–50 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  37. DeLone W and McLean E, Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable, Information Systems Research 3(1), 60–95 (1992) [Google Scholar]
  38. Delone W and McLean E, The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A TenYear Update. Journal of Management. Information System 19(4), 9–30 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  39. Gallivan M, Srite M, Information technology and culture: identifying fragmentary and holistic perspectives of culture, Inf Organ 15(4):295–338 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  40. Leidner DE, Kayworth T, A review of culture in information systems research: towards a theory of information technology culture conflict, Manage Inf Syst Q 30(2):357–399 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  41. Marcus A, Gould EW, Crosscurrents: cultural dimensions and global Web user- interface design, Interactions 7(4):32–46 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  42. Riri Satria, Penelitian Aspek Budaya pada Sistem Informasi, Jurnal Sistem Informasi · July 2012. Universitas Indonesia (2012) [Google Scholar]
  43. Brown, S. A., V. Venkatesh, Model of Adoption of Technology in Households: A Baseline Model test and Extension Incorporating Household Life Cycle, MIS Quarterly, Vol.29, No 3, September 2005: pg. 399–426 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  44. Feng, X., Information Systems Management and Culture: Experiences from a Chinese Perspectives, Ph.D. Dissertation, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven (2003) [Google Scholar]
  45. Avgerou, C., McGarth, Power, Rationality, and the Art of Living through SocioTechnical Change, MIS Quarterly, Vol.31, Issue 2, Juni 2007: pg. 295–315 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  46. Ahuja, M. K., J. B. Thatcher, Moving Beyond Intentions and Toward the Theory of Trying: Effects of Work Environment and Gender on Post-Adoption Information Technology Use, MIS Quarterly, Vol.29, No 3: pg. 427–460 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  47. Karahanna, E., R. Agarwal, C. M. Angst, Reconceptualizing Compatibility Beliefs in Technology Acceptance Research, MIS Quarterly, Vol.30, No 4: pg. 781–804 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  48. Paul, D. L., R. R. McDaniel Jr, Field Study of the Effect of Interpersonal Trust on Virtual Collaborative Relationship Performance, MIS Quarterly, Vol.28, No 4: pg. 183–227 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  49. Jasperson, J., P. E. Carter, R. W. Zmud, A Comprehensive Conceptualization of PostAdoptive Behaviors Associated with Information Technology Enabled Work Systems, MIS Quarterly, Vol.29, No 3: pg. 525–558 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  50. Gattiker, T. F., D. L. Goodhue, What Happens after ERP Implementation: Understanding the Impact of Interdependence and Differentiation on Plant-Level Outcomes, MIS Quarterly, Vol.29, No 3, pg. 559–585 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  51. Kummer, T.-F.; Leimeister, J. M. & Bick, M., On the Importance of National Culture for the Design of Information Systems. In: Business & Information Systems Engineering, Ausgabe/Number: 6, Vol.4, Erscheinungsjahr, Seiten/Pages: 317–330 2012 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.