EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 318 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 318 (2021) 01019 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 318, 2021
Second International Conference on Geotechnical Engineering – Iraq (ICGE 2021)
Article Number 01019
Number of page(s) 11
Section Developments in Geotechnical Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131801019
Published online 08 November 2021
  1. Madsen, P.A., Fuhrman, D.R. and Schäffer, H.A., 2008. On the solitary wave paradigm for tsunamis. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 113(C12). [Google Scholar]
  2. Mokhtar, Z.A.B., 2019. Modelling tsunami bore-induced pressures on various seawall types. Ph.D. Thesis, Universiti Putra Malaysia. [Google Scholar]
  3. Rossetto, T., Allsop, W., Charvet, I. and Robinson, D.I., 2011. Physical modelling of tsunami using a new pneumatic wave generator. Coastal Engineering, 58(6), pp.517–527. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Farahmandpour, O., Marsono, A.K., Forouzani, P., Md. Tap, M. and Abu Bakar, S., 2020. Experimental simulation of tsunami surge and its interaction with coastal structure. International Journal of Protective Structures, 11(2), pp.258–280. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Stolle, J., Goseberg, N., Nistor, I. and Petriu, E., 2019. Debris impact forces on flexible structures in extreme hydrodynamic conditions. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 84,pp.391–407. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Thusyanthan, N.I. and Gopal Madabhushi, S.P., 2008, May. Tsunami wave loading on coastal houses: a model approach. In Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers-civil engineering (Vol. 161, No. 2, pp. 77–86). Thomas Telford Ltd. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Briggs, M.J., 2013. Basics of physical modeling in coastal and hydraulic engineering. ERDC/CHL CHETN-XIII-3, Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineer Research and Development Center [Google Scholar]
  8. Heller, V., 2012. Model-prototype similarity. 4th Coastlab Teaching School, Wave and Tidal Energy, (January), pp.17–20. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wood, D.M., 2003. Geotechnical modelling (Vol. 1). CRC press. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wilkie, M.J. and Young, G.A.J., 1952. Pneumatic tide generator. The engineer, 25,pp.133–137. [Google Scholar]
  11. Aldefae, A.H., Shamkhi, M.S. and Khalaf, T., 2019. Design and manufacturing of geotechnical laboratory tools used in physical modeling. Cogent Engineering, 6(1), p.1637622. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Aldefae, A.H., Alkhafaji, R.A., Shamkhi, M.S. and Kumer, H.Q., 2019. Design and manufacturing of flume apparatus to investigate the failure mechanism of riverbanks. Cogent Engineering, 6(1), p.1655234. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Al-Aayedi, H.K., Aldefae, A.H. and Shamkhi, M.S., 2020, June. Seismic performance of bridge piers. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 870, No. 1, p. 012069). IOP Publishing. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Aldelfee, A.N. and Aldefae, A.H., 2021, February. Seismic performance of gravity quay wall. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 1058, No. 1, p. 012033). IOP Publishing. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Alaayedi, H.K., Aldefae, A.H., Shamkhi, M.S. and Humaish, W.H., 2021, February. Dynamic response of different bridge piers. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 1058, No. 1, p. 012045). IOP Publishing. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Aldefae, A.H. and Saleem, H.D., 2020, June. Design, Manufacturing and Testing of Biaxial Mechanical Travelling Pluviator. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 870, No. 1, p. 012071). IOP Publishing. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Aldefae, A.H. and Alkhafaji, R.A., 2021. Experimental and numerical modeling to investigate the riverbank’s stability. SN Applied Sciences, 3(2), pp.1–16. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Al-Defae, A.H., Caucis, K. and Knappett, J.A., 2013. Aftershocks and the whole-life seismic performance of granular slopes. Géotechnique, 63(14), pp.1230–1244. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cerfontaine, B., Knappett, J.A., Brown, M.J. and Bradshaw, A.S., 2019. Effect of soil deformability on the failure mechanism of shallow plate or screw anchors in sand. Computers and Geotechnics, 109,pp.34–45. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Annually, R.I., 1995. ASTM STANDARDS. [Google Scholar]
  21. Al-Defae, A.H. and Knappett, J.A., 2014. Centrifuge modeling of the seismic performance of pile-reinforced slopes. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 140(6), p.04014014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kumar, P.P., Patra, S. and Haldar, S., 2020. Behaviour of Screw Pile Under Axial Compressive and Lateral Loading in Sand for Offshore Energy Foundations. In Advances in Offshore Geotechnics (pp. 393–403). Springer, Singapore. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Puleo, J.A., 2020, February. Making Waves in the Classroom-Engaging Students in STEM through Hands-on Coastal Oceanography and Engineering. In Ocean Sciences Meeting 2020. AGU. [Google Scholar]
  24. Bascom, W.N., 1951. The relationship between sand size and beach-face slope. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 32(6), pp.866–874. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sorensen, R.M., 2005. Basic coastal engineering (Vol. 10). Springer Science & Business Media. [Google Scholar]
  26. Synolakis, C.E. and Bernard, E.N., 2006. Tsunami science before and beyond Boxing Day 2004. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 364(1845), pp.2231–2265. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sridhar, K. and Charles, A.L., 2019. In vitro antioxidant activity of Kyoho grape extracts in DPPH and ABTS assays: Estimation methods for EC50 using advanced statistical programs. Food Chemistry, 275,pp.41–49. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.