EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 318 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 318 (2021) 02002 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 318, 2021
Second International Conference on Geotechnical Engineering – Iraq (ICGE 2021)
Article Number 02002
Number of page(s) 11
Section Sustainable Construction Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131802002
Published online 08 November 2021
  1. Tariku, R. 2016. Project delivery systems and their effects on cost and time overrun on Ethiopian road authority projects. M.Sc. Thesis, Addis Ababa University. [Google Scholar]
  2. ASCE. 2012. Quality in the constructed project: A guide for owners, designers, and constructors. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers. [Google Scholar]
  3. Gajurel, A. 2014. Performance-based contracts for road projects: Comparative analysis of different types. Springer India. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hanna, A. S. 2016. Benchmark performance metrics for integrated project delivery. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(9), 04016040. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Debella, D. M. 2004. Construction delivery systems: A comparative analysis of the performance of systems within school districts. M.Sc. Thesis, School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh. [Google Scholar]
  6. Gade, D. R. 2018. An investigative analysis of skill sets for different delivery methods in the building industry. M.Sc. Thesis, Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Iowa State University. [Google Scholar]
  7. Mesfin, A., 2014, A Study on Construction contract risk management practices in Ethiopian building construction projects. M.Sc. Thesis, Addis Ababa University. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bennett, F. 2007. The Management of construction: A project life cycle approach. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 12–36. [Google Scholar]
  9. Turner, J. R., and Müller, R. 2004. Communication and co-operation on projects between the project owner as principal and the project manager as agent. European management journal, 22(3), 327. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pakkala, P. 2002. Innovative project delivery methods for infrastructure. Finish Road Enterprise, Helsinki, 19. [Google Scholar]
  11. Raimi, T. I. 2016. Application of construction management, procurement and project delivery systems by private housing developers in Nigeria for sustainable development. Procs. of the Joint International Conference (JIC) on 21st Century Human Habitat: Issues, Sustainability and Development, Akure, Nigeria, 706–717 [Google Scholar]
  12. Almazroa, D. A. 2004. Project delivery system decision framework using the weighting factors and analytic hierarchy process methods. Ph.D. Thesis, School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh. [Google Scholar]
  13. Huse, J. A. 2002. Understanding and negotiating turnkey and EPC contracts. Sweet and Maxwell. [Google Scholar]
  14. Tekka, R. S. 2018. Economic Empowerment of local skilled labour through Force Account in Building Renovation. Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, 2(6), 159. [Google Scholar]
  15. Molenaar, K., Harper, C., and Yugar-Arias, I. 2014. Guidebook for selecting alternative contracting methods for roadway projects: Project delivery methods, procurement procedures, and payment provisions. Transportation Pooled Fund Program Study TPF-5 (260), 410. [Google Scholar]
  16. Darko, A., Chan, A. P. C., Ameyaw, E. E., He, B. J., and Olanipekun, A. O. 2017. Examining issues influencing green building technologies adoption: The United States green building experts' perspectives. Energy and Buildings, 144,320–332. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Shan, M., and Hwang, B. G. 2018. Green building rating systems: Global reviews of practices and research efforts. Sustainable Cities and Society, 39,172–180. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hwang, B. G., and Tan, J. S. 2012. Green building project management: obstacles and solutions for sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 20(5), 335–349. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chan, A. P. C., Darko, A., and Ameyaw, E. E. 2017. Strategies for promoting green building technologies adoption in the construction industry—An international study. Sustainability, 9(6), 969. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, Y., Song, H., Sang, P., Chen, P. H., and Liu, X. 2019. Review of Critical Success Factors (CSFs) for green building projects. Building and Environment, 158,182–191. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Bilec, M., and Ries, R. 2007. Preliminary study of green design and project delivery methods in the public sector. Journal of Green Building, 2(2), 151–160. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Robichaud, L. B., and Anantatmula, V. S. 2011. Greening project management practices for sustainable construction. Journal of Management in Engineering, 27(1), 48–57. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhang, J., Li, H., Olanipekun, A.O. and Bai, L., 2019. A successful delivery process of green buildings: the project owners' view, motivation and commitment. Renewable energy, 138,651–658. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Leland Blank, P.E. and Anthony Tarquin, P.E., 2012. Engineering economy. Methods, 1(2), p.4. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.