Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 318, 2021
Second International Conference on Geotechnical Engineering – Iraq (ICGE 2021)
Article Number 02004
Number of page(s) 8
Section Sustainable Construction Management
Published online 08 November 2021
  1. Ramanathan, R. and Ganesh, L.S., 1994. Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: An evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members' weightages. European journal of operational research, 79(2), pp.249–265. [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrasiu, M., Baciu, A., Pascu, A., Puscas, E. and Tasnadi, A., 1986. Metode de decizii multicriteriale, Bucuresti: Ed. [Google Scholar]
  3. Tzeng, G.H. and Huang, J.J., 2011. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. CRC press. [Google Scholar]
  4. Saaty, T.L., 2014. Analytic heirarchy process. Wiley statsRef: Statistics reference online. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sinuany-Stern, Z., Mehrez, A. and Hadad, Y., 2000. An AHP/DEA methodology for ranking decision making units. International Transactions in Operational Research, 7(2), pp.109–124. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cheng, C.H., Chen, C.T. and Huang, S.F., 2012. Combining fuzzy integral with order weight average (OWA) method for evaluating financial performance in the semiconductor industry. African journal of business management, 6(21), pp.6358–6368. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang, Y.J., 2008. Applying FMCDM to evaluate financial performance of domestic airlines in Taiwan. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(3), pp.1837–1845. [Google Scholar]
  8. Aydogan, E.K., 2011. Performance measurement model for Turkish aviation firms using the rough-AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), pp.3992–3998. [Google Scholar]
  9. Boateng, P., Chen, Z. and Ogunlana, S.O., 2016. A dynamic framework for managing the complexities of risks in megaprojects. International journal of technology and management research, 1(5), pp.1–13. [Google Scholar]
  10. Tzeng, G.H. and Huang, J.J., 2011. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. CRC press. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lee, M.C., 2014. Information security risk analysis methods and research trends: AHP and fuzzy comprehensive method. International Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology, 6(1), p.29. [Google Scholar]
  12. Karim, R. and Karmaker, C.L., 2016. Machine selection by AHP and TOPSIS methods. American Journal of Industrial Engineering, 4(1), pp.7–13. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.