Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 319, 2021
International Congress on Health Vigilance (VIGISAN 2021)
Article Number 01087
Number of page(s) 5
Published online 09 November 2021
  1. J. Bines, B. Ivanoff, Acute intussusception in infants and children : incidence, clinical presentation and management : a global perspective. Report 2.19, Geneva, World Health Organisation (2002), [Google Scholar]
  2. S. Franchi, H. Martelli, A. Paye-Jaouen, D. Goldszmidt, D. Pariente, Acute intestinal intussusception in infants and children, EMC-Pediat 2, 45–57 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Marsicovetere, S.J. Ivatury, B. White, S.D. Holubar, Intestinal Intussusception : Etiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment, Clin Colon Rectal Surg 30, 30–39 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  4. L. Bajaj, M.G. Roback, Postreduction Management of Intussusception in a Children’s Hospital Emergency Department. Pediatrics 112(6), 1302–1307 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  5. M.D. Stringer, S.M. Pablot, R.J. Brereton, Paediatric intussusception, Br.J.Surg 79, 867–876 (1992). [Google Scholar]
  6. P. Verschelden, et al, Intussusception in Children : Reliability of US in Diagnosis- A prospective study, Radiology 184, 741–744 (1992). [Google Scholar]
  7. B. Bekdash, S.S. Marven, A. Spring, Reduction of intussusception : defining a better index of successful non –operative treatment, Pediatr Radiol 43, 649–656 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Khorana, et al, Enema reduction of intussusception : The success rate of hydrostatic and pneumatic reduction, Ther Clin Risk Manag 11, 1837–1842 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  9. G.S. Bisset III, D.R. Kirks, Intussusception in infants and children : Diagnosis and therapy, Radiology 168, 141–145 (1988). [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Jiang, et al, Childhood intussusception : A literature review, Plos One 8(7), e68482 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  11. M.M. Ahmad, et al, A experience of ultasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception at a tertiary care center, S Afr J Surg 54(1), 10–13 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  12. Krishnakumar, et al, Ultrasound guided hydrostatic reduction in the management of intussusception, Indian J Pediatr, 73(3), 217–220 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  13. S.M. Digant, S. Rucha, D, Ekta, Ultrasound guided reduction of an ileocolic intussusception by a hydrostatic method by using normal saline enema in peadriatric patients : Astudy of 30 cases, J Clin Diagn Res 6(10), 1722–1725 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  14. P. Minodier, T. Merrot, Invagination intestinale aigue de l’enfant. Med. Ther. Pediatrie, 9(1), 29–34 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  15. G. Del-Pozo, et al, Intussusception in children : Current concepts in diagnosis and enema reduction, Radiographics 19, 299–319 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  16. C. Baud, et al, Diagnostic échographique d’une invagination intestinale aigue chez l’enfant et impact thérapeutique, JIDI, 2, 135–142 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  17. C.WY. Wong, et al, Childhood intussusception : 17-year experience at a teriary referral centre in Hong Kong, Hong Kong Med J 21(6), 518–523 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  18. X. Xialong, et al, Risk factors for failure of hydrostatic reduction of intussusception in pediatric patients : A retrospective study, Medicine 98(1), e13826 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  19. S.C. Fallon, et al, Risk factors for surgey in pediatric intussusception in the era of pneumatic reduction, J Pediatr Surg 48, 1032–1036 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  20. J.A.M. Reijnen, et al, Intussusception : Factors related to treatment, Arch Dis Child 65, 871–873 (1990). [Google Scholar]
  21. N. He, et al, Risk factors associated with failed sonographically guided saline hydrostatic intussusception reduction in children, J Ultrasound Med 33, 1669–1675 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Daneman, et al, Perforation during attempted intussusception reduction in children- a comparison of perforation with barium and air, Pediatr Radiol 25(2), 81–88 (1995.) [Google Scholar]
  23. X. Xialong, et al, A randomized trial of pneumatic reduction versus hydrostatic reduction for intussusception in pediatric patients, J Pediatr Surg 53(8), 1464–1468 (2018). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.