Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 335, 2022
The 2nd International Conference on Environmentally Sustainable Animal Industry (The 2nd ICESAI 2021)
Article Number 00053
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202233500053
Published online 14 January 2022
  1. M. Blümmel, E.R. Ørskov, Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 40, 109–119 (1993) [Google Scholar]
  2. M.S. Dhanoa, S. Lopez, J. Dijkstra, D.R. Davies, R. Sanderson, B.A. Williams, Z. Sileshi, J. France, B. J. N. 82, 131–142 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  3. A.S. Chaudhry, R.A.I. Mohamed, Czech J. Anim. Sci. 57, 265–273 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Mutimura, C.B. Myambi, P. Gahunga, D.M. Mgheni, G.H. Laswai, L.A. Mtenga, D. Gahakwa, A.E. Kimambo, C. Ebong, Agric J. 8, 173–180 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  5. S.E. Cavalcante, V.R. Vasconcelos, A.L. Abdalla, A.A. Alves, A.S. Natel, D. Shanasekaran, L.R.F. da Silva, J.C. Siqueira, Faecal inoculum as alternative microbial source for in vitro rumen fermentation techniques, in Proceeding of Conference on International Research on Food Security, Natural Resource Management and Rural Development, 16-18 September 2015, Berlin, Germany (2015) [Google Scholar]
  6. J.W. Cone, A.H. van Gelder, H. Bachmann, Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 99, 221–231 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  7. C.S. Pandian, T.J. Reddy, K. Sivalah, M. Blümmel, Y.R. Reddy, Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 16, 271–281 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  8. G.T. Bergmann, B. M. C. Vet. Res. 13, 253 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  9. T. Geishauser, A. Gitzel, S. R. R. 21, 63–69 (1996) [Google Scholar]
  10. G.A. Beyihayo, R. Omaria, C. Namazzi, A. Atuhaire, U. G. A. S. 16, 93–98 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  11. A.S. Chaudhry, R.A.I. Mohamed. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 57, 2012 (6): 265–273 [Google Scholar]
  12. N. Denek, A. Can, M. Avei. S. A. J. A. S. 40, 251–256 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  13. S.A. Nagadi, Met. Env. & Arid Land Agric. Sci. 28, 27–36 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  14. AOAC Official Method of Analysis. 18th Edition, Association of Officiating Analytical Chemists, Washington DC, Method 935.14 and 992.24. (2005) [Google Scholar]
  15. H. Soetanto, R.M. Aprilia, M.S. Pramita and I. Banna. Comparison of Three Different Rumen Fluid As A Source of Inoculum To Evaluate In Vitro Gas Production And Digestibility of Elephant Grass-Concentrate Mixture, In Proceedings of 2nd International Conference On Animal Production For Food Sustainability, Organized by the University of Andalas and University of Udayana, held on June 16th, 2021, (2021). [Google Scholar]
  16. H.P.S. Makkar, M. Blümmel, K. Becker, B. J. N. 73, 897–913 (1995) [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Blümmel, H. Steingaß, K. Becker, B. J. N. 77, 911–921 (1997) [Google Scholar]
  18. A. Sastrosupadi, Rancangan Percobaan Praktis Untuk Bidang Pertanian, Kanisius, Yogyakarta (1995) [Google Scholar]
  19. E. Jami, A. Israel, A. Kotser, I. Mizrahi, The ISME J. 7, 1069–1079 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Wang, J. Pisarčíková, M. Kreuzer, A. Schwarm, Can. J. Anim. Sci. 1–30 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  21. F. Li, C. Li, Y. Chen, J. Liu, C. Zhang, B. Irving, C. Fitzsimmons, G. Platstow, L.L. Guan, Microbiome, 7, 1–17 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  22. T.A. McAllister, H.D. Bae, G.A. Jones, K.J. Cheng, J. Anim. Sci. 7, 303–316 (1994) [Google Scholar]
  23. D.V. Dung, W. Shang, W. Yao, Asian Australas. J. Anim. 27, 797–805 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  24. J.W. Cone, A.H. van Gelder, Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 76, 251–264 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Karabulut, O. Canbolat, H. Kalkan, F. Gurbuzol, E. Sucu, I. Filya, Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 4, 517–522 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  26. J.W. Cone, A.H. van Gelder, F. Driehuis, Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 66, 31–45 (1997) [Google Scholar]
  27. E.R. Ørskov, I. McDonald, J. Agric. Sci. 92, 499–503 (1979) [Google Scholar]
  28. P. McDonald, R.A. Edwards, J.F.D. Greenhalgh, C.A. Morgan, Animal Nutrition, 7th Edn, John Willey and Sons, New York, USA (2010) [Google Scholar]
  29. P. Mazur, A.J.P. Cell 247, 125–142 (1984) [Google Scholar]
  30. I. Tanasawa, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 858, 227–234 (1998) [Google Scholar]
  31. E. Nsabimana, S. Kisidayova, D. Macheboeuf, C.J. Newbold, J.P. Jouany, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 3826–3832 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  32. N.D. Luchini, G.A. Broderick, D.K. Combs, J. Anim. Sci. 74, 1134–1143 (1996) [Google Scholar]
  33. A. Prates, J.A. de Oliveira, L. Abecia, M. Fondevila, Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 155, 186–193 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  34. M. Spanghero, M. Chiaravalli, S. Colombini, C. Fabro, F. Froldi, F. Mason, M. Moschini, C. Sarnataro, S. Schiavon, F. Tagliapietra, Animals 9, 1–14 (2019) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.