Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 337, 2022
International Conference on Climate Nexus Perspectives: Toward Innovative, Resilient and Sustainable Solutions for Natural Resources and Biodiversity Management (I2CNP 2021)
Article Number 04008
Number of page(s) 10
Section Sustainability of Food Systems and Agricultural Productions
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202233704008
Published online 20 January 2022
  1. M, Pourghayoumi, et al., Phytochemical attributes of some dried fig (Ficus carica L.) fruit cultivars grown in Iran. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus, 81(3): p. 161-166 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  2. A.H Achtak, et al., Traditional agroecosystems as conservatories and incubators of cultivated plant varietal diversity: the case of fig (Ficus carica L.) in Morocco. BMC plant biology, . 10(1): p. 1-12 (2010). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Y, Hmimsa., Y. Aumeeruddy-Thomas, and M. Ater, Une forme spontanée de figuier (Ficus carica L.), le nābūt. Diversité de nomenclature, d’usage et de pratiques locales au Nord du Maroc. Revue d’ethnoecologie, (Supplément 1) (2017). [Google Scholar]
  4. B, Khadari, et al., Contrasted genetic diversity and differentiation among Mediterranean populations of Ficus carica L.: a study using mtDNA RFLP. Genetic resources and crop evolution, 52(1): p. 97-109 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. D, Zohary, and M. Hopf, Domestication of plants in the Old World: The origin and spread of cultivated plants in West Asia, Europe and the Nile Valley: Oxford University Press (2000). [Google Scholar]
  6. Y, Aumeeruddy-Thomas, and Y. Hmimsa, Fig and olive domestication in the Rif, northern Morocco:Entangled human and tree lives and history, in Hybrid Communities, Routledge. p. 179-196 ( 2018). [Google Scholar]
  7. Y, Hmimsa, Y. Aumeeruddy-Thomas, and M. Ater, Vernacular taxonomy, classification and varietal diversity of fig (Ficus carica L.) among Jbala cultivators in northern Morocco. Human Ecology, 40(2): p. 301-313( 2012). [Google Scholar]
  8. A, El Hajjam, and A. Ezzahouani, Conduite technique et inventaire des variétés locales marocaines de figuier (Ficus carica L.) dans quatre principaux sites de production, provinces de Chefchaouen, El Jadida, Ouezzane, et Taounate. Revue Marocaine des Sciences Agronomiques et Vétérinaires, 6(4): p. 494-504 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  9. L, Hssaini, et al., Characterization of local fig clones (Ficus carica L.) collected in Northern Morocco. Fruits, 74(2): p. 55-64 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  10. I Ipgri, C., Descriptors for fig. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy, and International Centre for Advanced Mediterranean Agronomic Studies, Paris, France, 52 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  11. J, Gil, et al., Las higueras canarias y su diversidad: Bases orales y documentales (2011). [Google Scholar]
  12. U, Aksoy, Descriptors for fig (Ficus carica L. and related Ficus sp.). Ege Uni. Faculty of Agriculture. Department of Horticulture, Izmir, Turkey, (1991). [Google Scholar]
  13. H.C.P, Monographie de la région de l’oriental. [p 203](janvier 2021) Available from: https://www.hcp.ma/region-oriental/docs/Monographies/Monographie%20de%20la%20region%20-%20Janvier%202021.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  14. A, Oukabli, S. Bartolini, and R. Viti, Anatomical and morphological study of apple (Malus× domestica Borkh.) flower buds growing under inadequate winter chilling. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 78(4): p. 580-585 (2003). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. A.K, Yadav, Phalsa: A potential new small fruit for Georgia. 1999, ASHS Press: Alexandria, VA, USA. p. 348-352 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  16. M, Simsek, Evaluation of selected fig genotypes from South east Turkey. African Journal of Biotechnology, 8(19). [Google Scholar]
  17. O, Çalişkan, and A.A. Polat, Morphological diversity among fig (Ficus carica L.) accessions sampled from the Eastern Mediterranean Region of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 36(2): p. 179-193 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  18. B, Gaaliche, et al, Pomological and biochemical characteristics of fig (Ficus carica L.) cv. Zidi in different agroecological zones of Tunisia. Pak. J. Agri. Sci, 49(4): p. 425-428 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  19. A, Abo-El-Ez, R. Mostafa, and I.F. Badawy, Growth and productivity of three fig (Ficus carica L.) cultivars grown under upper Egypt conditions. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 7(2): p. 709-714 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  20. E, Khanfir, Identification of genetic diversity of Ficus carica: Morphological and molecular characterization of varieties from Kerkennah. Editions Universitaires Européennes. Saarbrücken, Allemagne, 106 p (2015). [Google Scholar]
  21. O, Çalişkan, and A.A. Polat, Fruit characteristics of fig cultivars and genotypes grown in Turkey. Scientia horticulturae, 115(4): p. 360-367 (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. M.B, Miklavcic, B.B. Valencic V., Sugars and Organic Acids Content in Fig Crops, 90–100 pp 2006 and 2007: In The Common Fig (Ficus carica L.) in Istria.Morphological, Molecular and Some Chemical Characteristics. University of Primorska, Science and Research Centre Koper, Publishing House Annales. Project RGFI−Revitalization of Fig Cultivation in Istria, 104 p (2008). [Google Scholar]
  23. U, Aksoy, et al., Ege Bölgesi koşullarına uygun sofralık incir çeşit seleksiyonu. Türkiye I. Ulusal Bahçe Bitkileri Kongresi, 1: p. 545-548 (1992). [Google Scholar]
  24. I, Travers, Influence des conditions pédoclimatiques du terroir sur le comportement du pommier et la composition des pommes à cidre dans le Pays d’Auge, Caen (2004). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.