EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 340 (2022) E3S Web Conf., 340 (2022) 04002 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 340, 2022
The 13th of Aceh International Workshop and Expo on Sustainable Tsunami Disaster Recovery (The 13th AIWEST-DR 2021)
Article Number 04002
Number of page(s) 10
Section Urban Planning, Reconstruction and Recovery
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202234004002
Published online 25 January 2022
  1. National Geophysical Data Center / World Data Service: NCEI/WDS Global Historical Tsunami Database. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information. doi: 10.7289/V5PN93H7 (Accessed on 20 July 2021) [Google Scholar]
  2. D. Guha-Sapir, EM-DAT: The Emergency Events Database. https://public.emdat.be/data (Accessed on 20 July 2021) [Google Scholar]
  3. UNISDR, Words into Action guidelines: National Disaster Risk Assessment (2017) [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Suppasri, E. Mas, I. Charvet, R. Gunasekera, K. Imai, Y. Fukutani, Y. Abe and F. Imamura, Nat. Hazards 66, 319–341 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  5. I. Charvet, I. Ioannou, T. Rossetto, A. Suppasri and F. Imamura, Nat. Hazards 73, 951–973 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  6. R. de Risi, K. Goda, N. Mori and T. Yasuda, Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 31, 1253–1269 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  7. Y. Xiong, Q. Liang, H. Park, D. Cox and G. Wang, Coast. Eng. 144, 1–14 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Bonacho and C.S. Oliveira, Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 31, 275–280 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  9. H. Park, M.S. Alam, D.T. Cox, A.R. Barbosa and J.W. Van de Lindt, Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 35, 101076 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Mück, H. Taubenböck, J. Post, S. Wegscheider, G. Strunz, S. Sumaryono and F.A. Ismail, Nat. Hazards 68, 97–114 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  11. F. Dall'Osso, D. Dominey-Howes, C. Tarbotton, S. Summerhayes and G. Withycombe, Nat. Hazards 83, 1229–1256 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  12. P. Srivihok, K. Honda, A. Ruangrassamee, V. Muangsin, P. Naparat, P. Foytong, N. Promdumrong, P. Aphimaeteethomrong, A. Intavee, J.E. Layung and T. Kosin, Cont. Shelf Res. 79, 3–15 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  13. K. Goda and J. Song, Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 30(8), 2271–2285 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  14. O.D. Cardona, M.K. van Aalst, J. Birkmann, M. Fordham, G. McGregor, R. Perez, R.S. Pulwarty, E.L.F. Schipper, and B.T. Sinh, Determinants of risk: exposure and vulnerability, in Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation [C.B. Field, V. Barros, T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, D.J. Dokken, K.L. Ebi, M.D. Mastrandrea, K.J. Mach, G.-K. Plattner, S.K. Allen, M. Tignor, and P.M. Midgley (eds.)] (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USA, pp. 65–108, 2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. GFDRR/World Bank, Understanding risk: review of open source and open access software packages available to quantify risk from natural hazards (World Bank Group, Washington, DC, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  16. B. Wisner and H.R. Luce, GeoJournal 30(2), 127–140 (1993) [Google Scholar]
  17. T. Cannon, Vulnerability analysis, livelihoods and disasters, in Risk 21: Coping with Risks Due to Natural Hazards in the 21st Century [W.J. Ammann, S. Dannenmann, and L. Vulliet (eds.)] (Taylor and Francis Group, London, UK, pp. 41–49, 2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. H. Park, D.T. Cox and A.R. Barbosa, Coast. Eng. 122, 10–26 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  19. K. Goda and R. de Risi, Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 28, 539–554 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Karafagka, S. Fotopoulou and K. Pitilakis, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 112, 118–137 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Belliazzi, G.P. Lignola, M. di Ludovico and A. Prota, Structures 31, 68–79 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  22. G.S. Leonard, N. Evans, G. Prasetya, W.S.A. Saunders, L. Pearse, D. Monastra, and S. Fraser, Scoping study for evaluating the tsunami vulnerability of New Zealand buildings for use as evacuation structures, GNS Science Report 2011/36 39 p. (2011) [Google Scholar]
  23. R.A. Darlymple and D.L. Kriebel, Lessons in engineering from the tsunami in Thailand in The Bridge Vol. 35, No. 2, G. Bugliarello (ed.) (National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, 2005) pp. 4–13 [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Medina, J. Lizarazo-Marriaga, M. Estrada, S. Koshimura, E. Mas and B. Adriano, Eng. Struct. 196, 109309 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  25. R.S.M. Samarasekara, J. Sasaki, M. Esteban and H. Matsuda, Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 23, 80–92 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  26. R. de Risi, K. Goda, T. Yasuda and N. Mori, Earth Sci. Rev. 166, 64–82 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  27. J.C.L. Bayas, C. Marohn, G. Dercon, S. Dewi, H.P. Piepho, L. Joshi, M. van Noordwijk and G. Cadisch, Influence of coastal vegetation on the 2004 tsunami wave impact in west Aceh in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108(46), 18612–18617 (2011) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. A.M. Hashim, SM.P. Catherine and H. Takaijudin, Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 5(18), 4483–4488 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  29. R. Omira, M.A. Baptista, J.M. Miranda, E. Toto, V. Catita and J. Catalao, Nat. Hazards 54, 75–95 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  30. H. Takagi and J.D. Bricker, Coast. Eng. 56(4), 1450018 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  31. K. Harada and F. Imamura, Effects of coastal forest on tsunami hazard mitigation - a preliminary investigation, in: K. Satake (eds) Tsunamis. Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, Vol. 23, Springer, Dordrecht (2005) [Google Scholar]
  32. H. Ismail, A.K. Abd Wahab and N.E. Alias, Nat. Hazards 63, 939–963 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  33. T.L. Saaty, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 48, 9–26 (1990) [Google Scholar]
  34. K. Nakata, A. Katsumata and A. Muhari, Earth Planets and Space 72:44 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  35. A.R. Gusman, P. Supendi, A.D. Nugraha, W. Power, H. Latief, H. Sunendar, S. Widiyantoro, Daryono, S.H. Wiyono, A. Hakim, A. Muhari, X. Wang, D. Burbidge, K. Palgunadi, I. and M.R. Daryono, Geophys. Res. Lett. 46(15), doi: 10.1029/2019GL082717 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  36. Global Volcanism Program, Report on Krakatau (Indonesia) (Crafford, A.E., and Venzke, E., eds.). Bulletin of the Global Volcanism Network, 43:10, Smithsonian Institution (2018) [Google Scholar]
  37. Global Volcanism Program, Report on Krakatau (Indonesia) (Krippner, J.B., and Venzke, E., eds.). Bulletin of the Global Volcanism Network, 44:3, Smithsonian Institution (2019) [Google Scholar]
  38. L. Ye, H. Kanamori, L. Rivera, T. Lay, Y. Zhou, D. Sianipar and K. Satake, Sci. Adv. 6(3), eaaz1377 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  39. T. Takabatake, T. Shibayama, M. Esteban, H. Achiari, N. Nurisman, M. Gelfi, T.A. Tarigan, E.R. Kencana, M.A.R. Fauzi, S. Panalaran, A.S. Harnantyari, T.O. Kyaw, Coast. Eng. J. 61, 423443 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  40. R. Paulik, A. Gusman, J.H. Williams, G.M. Pratama, S.L. Lin, A. Prawirabhakti, K. Sulendra, M.Y. Zachari, Z.E.D. Fortuna, N.B.P. Layuk and N.W.I. Suwarni, Pure Appl. Geophys. 176, 33053321 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  41. Syamsidik, Benazir, M. Luthfi, A. Suppasri and L.K. Comfort, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 20, 549–565 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  42. A. Suppasri, I. Charvet, J. Macabuag, T. Rossetto, N. Leelawat, P. Latcharote and F. Imamura, Building Damage Assessment and Implications for Future Tsunami Fragility Estimations in M. Esteban, H. Takagi and T. Shibayama (eds.) Handbook of Coastal Disaster Mitigation for Engineers and Planners (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2015) [Google Scholar]
  43. S. Reese, B.A. Bradley, J. Bind, G. Smart, W. Power and J. Sturman, Earth Sci. Rev. 107, 156173 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  44. K.I.U. Nanayakkara and W.P.S. Dias, Nat. Hazards 80, 471–486 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  45. E. Lahcene, I. Ioannou, A. Suppasri, K. Pakoksung, R. Paulik, Syamsidik, F. Bouchette and F. Imamura, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 21, 2313–2344 (2021) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.