Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 347, 2022
2nd International Conference on Civil and Environmental Engineering (ICCEE 2022)
Article Number 01012
Number of page(s) 9
Section Infrastructure and Building Construction
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202234701012
Published online 14 April 2022
  1. H. Abdul-Rahman, C. Wang, and X. W. Yap, “How professional ethics impact construction quality: Perception and evidence in a fast developing economy,” Sci. Res. Essays, 5, 23, pp. 3742–3749 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  2. N. Mohamad, H. Abdul Rahman, I. M. Usman, and N. M. Tawil, “Ethics education and training for construction professionals in Malaysia,” Asian Soc. Sci., 11, 4, pp. 55–64 (2015) doi: 10.5539/ass.v11n4p55. [Google Scholar]
  3. J. B. H. Yap, K. Y. Lee, and M. Skitmore, “Analysing the causes of corruption in the Malaysian construction industry,” J. Eng. Des. Technol., 18, 6, pp. 1823–1847 (2020) doi: 10.1108/JEDT-02-2020-0037. [Google Scholar]
  4. O. E. Alutu, “Unethical practices in Nigerian construction industry: Prospective engineers’ viewpoint,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 133, 2, pp. 84–88 (2007) doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1052-3928(2007)133:2(84). [Google Scholar]
  5. N. Ehsan, S. Anwar, and M. Talha, “Professional Ethics in Construction Industry of Pakistan,” Proc. World Congr. Eng., I, p. 5 (2009) [Online]. Available: http://www.iaeng.org/publication/WCE2009/WCE2009_pp729-733.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  6. P. Bowen, R. Pearl, and A. Akintoye, “Professional ethics in the South African construction industry,” Build. Res. Inf., 35, 2, pp. 189–205 (2007) doi: 10.1080/09613210600980267. [Google Scholar]
  7. Transparency International Malaysia, “Transparency International Malaysia Corruption Perceptions Index 2019,” [Online] Available at: https://transparency.org.my/pages/what-we-do/indexes/transparency-internationalmalaysia-corruption-perceptions-index-2019 [Google Scholar]
  8. C.-J. Lee, R. Wang, C.-Y. Lee, C. C. W. Hung, and S.-C. Hsu, “Board Structure and Directors’ Role in Preventing Corporate Misconduct in the Construction Industry,” J. Manag. Eng., 34, 2, p. 04017067 (2018) doi: 10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000593. [Google Scholar]
  9. O. J. Alkhatib, “A Moral (Normative) Framework for the Judgment of Actions and Decisions in the Construction Industry and Engineering: Part II,” Sci. Eng. Ethics, 23, 6, pp. 1617–1641 (2017) doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9851-5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. R. Chotibhongs and D. Arditi, “Analysis of collusive bidding behaviour,” Constr. Manag. Econ., 30, 3, pp. 221–231 (2012) doi: 10.1080/01446193.2012.661443. [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Ballesteros-Pérez, M. C. González-Cruz, A. Cañavate-Grimal, and E. Pellicer, “Detecting abnormal and collusive bids in capped tendering,” Autom. Constr., 31, pp. 215–229 (2013) doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2012.11.036. [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Shan, A. P. C. Chan, Y. Le, Y. Hu, and B. Xia, “Understanding Collusive Practices in Chinese Construction Projects,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., 143, 3 (2017) doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000314. [Google Scholar]
  13. L.Liu, P. Bannerman, X. Ding, E. Elliot, G. Ewart, and X. Kong, “The Motives for and Consequences of Underpricing for Construction Contractors—Evidence from Australia,” J. Mod. Proj. Manag., pp. 37–45 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  14. E. A. Adjei, F. D. K. Fugar, E. Adinyira, D. J. Edwards, and E. A. Parn, “Exploring the Significant Cash Flow Factors Influencing Building Projects Profitability in Ghana,” Int. J. Constr. Eng. Manag., 7, 1, pp. 35–46 (2018) doi: 10.5923/j.ijcem.20180701.04. [Google Scholar]
  15. Designing Building for Construction Wiki, “Front-loaded cost,” (2019) [Online] Available at: https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Front-loaded_costs [Google Scholar]
  16. C. Vee and M. Skitmore, “Professional ethics in the construction industry,” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag., 10, 2, pp. 117–127 (2003) doi: 10.1108/09699980310466596. [Google Scholar]
  17. Z. Ibrahim, N. Hamzah, and M. A. Khoiry, “Research on the unethical conducts and practices among professionals in the construction industry,” Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng., 8, 2, pp. 1130–1136 (2019), doi: 10.35940/ijrte.B1209.0782S319. [Google Scholar]
  18. A. O. Akponeware and Z. A. Adamu, “Clash detection or clash avoidance? An investigation into coordination problems in 3D BIM,” Buildings, 7, 3, pp. 1–28 (2017) doi: 10.3390/buildings7030075. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. J. K. W. Wong, J. X. Zhou, and A. P. C. Chan, “Exploring the linkages between the adoption of bim and design error reduction,” Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plan., 13, 1, pp. 108–120 (2018) doi: 10.2495/SDP-V13-N1-108-120. [Google Scholar]
  20. O. Dosumu, “An assessment of the causes, cost effects and solutions to designerrorinduced variations on selected building projects in Nigeria,” Acta Structilia, 25, 1, pp. 40–70 (2018), doi: 10.18820/24150487/as25i1.2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Boukendour, “Errors in Bill of Quantities in public procurement: How to improve accountability and accuracy,” (2016) [Online] Available at: http://www.ippa.org/images/PROCEEDINGS/IPPC7/Paper45_Boukendour.pdf [Google Scholar]
  22. S. A. Biancardo, N. Viscione, C. Oreto, R. Veropalumbo, and F. Abbondati, “BIM approach for modeling airports terminal expansion,” Infrastructures, 5, 5, pp. 1–14 (2020) doi: 10.3390/infrastructures5050041. [Google Scholar]
  23. R. Charef, S. Emmitt, H. Alaka, and F. Fouchal, “Building Information Modelling adoption in the European Union: An overview,” J. Build. Eng., 25 (2019) doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100777. [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Costin, A. Adibfar, H. Hu, and S. S. Chen, “Building Information Modeling (BIM) for transportation infrastructure – Literature review, applications, challenges, and recommendations,” Autom. Constr., 94, pp. 257–281 (2018) doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2018.07.001. [Google Scholar]
  25. I. Othman, Y. Y. Al-Ashmori, Y. Rahmawati, Y. H. Mugahed Amran, and M. A. M. Al-Bared, “The level of Building Information Modelling (BIM) Implementation in Malaysia,” Ain Shams Eng. J., 12, 1, pp. 455–463 (2021) doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2020.04.007. [Google Scholar]
  26. M. R. Hosseini et al., “BIM adoption within Australian small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): An innovation diffusion model,” Constr. Econ. Build., 16, 3, pp. 71–86, (2016) doi: 10.5130/AJCEB.v16i3.5159. [Google Scholar]
  27. S. Girginkaya Akdag and U. Maqsood, “A roadmap for BIM adoption and implementation in developing countries: the Pakistan case,” Archnet-IJAR, 14, 1, pp. 112–132 (2020) doi: 10.1108/ARCH-04-2019-0081. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. S. O. Babatunde, C. Udeaja, and A. O. Adekunle, “Barriers to BIM implementation and ways forward to improve its adoption in the Nigerian AEC firms,” Int. J. Build. Pathol. Adapt., 39, 1, pp. 48–71 (2021) doi: 10.1108/IJBPA-05-2019-0047. [Google Scholar]
  29. Handbook for the Implementation of Building Information Modelling in Construction Industry Transformation Programme 2016-2020, Construction Industry Development Board Malaysia., Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (2018) [Google Scholar]
  30. CIDB, “BIM Guide,” (2016) [Online] Available at: https://mybim.cidb.gov.my/download/bim-guide-book-1/ [Google Scholar]
  31. United BIM, “BIM Dimension,” (2020) [Online] Available at: https://www.unitedbim.com/what-are-bim-dimensions-3d-4d-5d-6d-7d-bim-explained-definitionbenefits/ [Google Scholar]
  32. K. Al Shami, “Investigating the use Building Information Modeling (BIM) in Managing Construction Claims,” PM World J., 7, 2, pp. 1–17 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  33. Autodesk, “Naviswork,” (2021) [Online] Available at: https://www.autodesk.com/products/navisworks/overview?plc=NAVSIM&term=1-YEAR&support=ADVANCED&quantity=1 [Google Scholar]
  34. A. A. Latiffi, S. Mohd, N. Kasim, and M. S. Fathi, “Building Information Modeling (BIM) Application in Malaysian Construction Industry,” 2, pp. 1–6 (2013) doi: 10.5923/s.ijcem.201309.01. [Google Scholar]
  35. U. Sekaran, Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach, 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Son (2000) [Google Scholar]
  36. R.B. Johnson and L. Christensen, Educational Research Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Approaches, 5th ed. USA: SAGE (2014) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.