Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 347, 2022
2nd International Conference on Civil and Environmental Engineering (ICCEE 2022)
Article Number 03009
Number of page(s) 12
Section Earthquake and Geotechnical Engineering
Published online 14 April 2022
  1. R. Nithiaraj, W. H. Ting, and A. S. Balasubramaniam, “Strength parameters of residual soils and application to stability analysis of anchored slopes,” Geotech. Eng., vol. 27, no.2, (1996) [Google Scholar]
  2. M. R. Taha, M. K. Hossain, and S. A. Mofiz, “Behaviour and modelling of granite residual soil in direct shear test,” J. Inst. Eng. Malaysia, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 27–40, (2000) [Google Scholar]
  3. G. Girmay, A. Moges, and A. Muluneh, “Estimation of soil loss rate using the USLE model for Agewmariayam Watershed, northern Ethiopia,” Agric. Food Secur., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–12, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  4. K. G. Renard, G. R. Foster, G. A. Weesies, and J. P. Porter, “RUSLE: Revised universal soil loss equation,” J. soil Water Conserv., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 30–33, (1991) [Google Scholar]
  5. S. H. R. Sadeghi, L. Gholami, A. Khaledi Darvishan, and P. Saeidi, “A review of the application of the MUSLE model worldwide,” Hydrol. Sci. J., vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 365–375, (2014) [Google Scholar]
  6. R. Z. Abidin and M. Ayob, Forecasting Erosion Induced Landside. University Publication Centre (UPENA), Universiti Teknologi MARA, (2009) [Google Scholar]
  7. R. Z. Abidin, M. S. Sulaiman, and N. Yusoff, “Erosion risk assessment: A case study of the Langat Riverbank in Malaysia,” Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 26– 35, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Hashim et al., “An analysis of the collapse potential of slope using the ROM scale: a case study of Sultan Azlan Shah Campus, Sultan Idris Education University, Malaysia,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 821–835, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  9. R. Z. Abidin and Z. A. Hassan, “’ROM’ Scale for Forecasting Erosion Induced Landslide Risk on Hilly Terrain,” in Landslides, Springer, (2005), pp. 197–202 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. T. Lah and T. Firdaus, “Assesment of ROM scale with regards to variation in depth at landslide tragedic sites in Selangor,” (2007) [Google Scholar]
  11. I. Das and S. Deka, “Application of ROM Scale for Estimating Bank Erosion Vulnerable Areas in Kamrup District, Assam,” Int. J. Manag., vol. 11, no. 12, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Fakher, M. Khodaparast, and C. Jones, “The use of the Mackintosh Probe for site investigation in soft soils,” Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 189–196, (2006) [Google Scholar]
  13. A. A. Sabtan and W. M. Shehata, “Mackintosh Probe as an exploration tool,” Bull. Int. Assoc. Eng. Geol. l’Association Int. Géologie l’Ingénieur, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 89–94, (1994) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. S. M. Mitu, N. A. Rahman, A. M. Taib, and K. A. M. Nayan, “Determination of Soil Bearing Capacity from Spectral Analysis of Surface Wave Test, Standard Penetration Test and Mackintosh Probe Test,” Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng., vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 340–346, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  15. T. Tarmizi, R. Saad, N. M. Muztaza, N. A. Ismail, M. M. Saidin, and E. T. Mohamad, “Integration of SPT (N-value), Mackintosh Probe (M-Value) and Resistivity Values for Soft Soil Assessment,” J. Teknol., vol. 78, no. 8–6, (2016) [Google Scholar]
  16. H. Rosyida, F. Fatnanta, and S. A. Nugroho, “Prakiraan Nilai Kuat Geser Tanah Lunak berdasarkan Pengujian Mackintosh Probe.” Skripsi Jurusan Teknik Sipil FT. Pekanbaru: Universitas Riau, (2013) [Google Scholar]
  17. F. Brunori, M. C. Penzo, and D. Torri, “Soil shear strength: its measurement and soil detachability,” Catena, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 59–71, (1989) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. D. Department of Irrigation and Drainage Malaysia, “Guideline for Erosion and Sediment Control in Malaysia,” (2010) [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Marto and F. Kasim, “Characterisation Of Malaysian Residual Soils For Geotechnical And Construction Engineering,” Academia, no. 1-415, (2005) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.