EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 349 (2022) E3S Web Conf., 349 (2022) 01002 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 349, 2022
10th International Conference on Life Cycle Management (LCM 2021)
Article Number 01002
Number of page(s) 8
Section Life Cycle and Circular Economy
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202234901002
Published online 20 May 2022
  1. European Parliament and Council: Directive 94/62/EC of 20 December 1994 on packaging and packaging waste, Off. J. Eur. Union (1994). [Google Scholar]
  2. Tencati, A.; Pogutz, S.; Moda, B.; Brambilla, M. and Cacia, C.: Prevention policies addressing packaging and packaging waste: Some emerging trends, Waste Manag., 56 (2016), pp. 35-45. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Long, J.; Hart, M. and Guerriero, S.: Chemical (Re)action: Growth in a circular economy: Accenture Chemicals (2019). [Google Scholar]
  4. Syberg, K.; Hansen, S. F.; Christensen, T. B. and Khan, F. R.: Risk Perception of Plastic Pollution: Importance of Stakeholder Involvement and Citizen Science, 58 (2018), pp. 203-221. [Google Scholar]
  5. Pinto da Costa, J.; Rocha-Santos, T. and Duarte, A.: The environmental impacts of plastics and micro-plastics use, waste and pollution: EU and national measures (2020). [Google Scholar]
  6. Schnurr, R. E. J.; Alboiu, V.; Chaudhary, M.; Corbett, R. A.; Quanz, M. E.; Sankar, K. et al.: Reducing marine pollution from single-use plastics (SUPs): A review, Mar. Pollut. Bulletin, 137 (2018), pp. 157-171. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Willman-Iivarinen, H.: The future of consumer decision making, Eur. J. Futures Res., 5 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Verghese, K. L.; Horne, R. and Carre, A.: PIQET: the design and development of an online ‘streamlined’ LCA tool for sustainable packaging design decision support, Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 15 (2010), pp. 608-620. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Svanes, E.; Vold, M.; Møller, H.; Pettersen, M. K.; Larsen, H. and Hanssen, O. J.: Sustainable packaging design: a holistic methodology for packaging design, Packag. Technol. Sci., 23 (2010), pp. 161-175. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pauer, E.; Wohner, B.; Heinrich, V. and Tacker, M.: Assessing the Environmental Sustainability of Food Packaging: An Extended Life Cycle Assessment including Packaging-Related Food Losses and Waste and Circularity Assessment, Sustain., 11 (2019), p. 925. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Grönman, K.; Soukka, R.; Järvi-Kääriäinen, T.; Katajajuuri, J.-M.; Kuisma, M.; Koivupuro, H.-K. et al.: Framework for Sustainable Food Packaging Design, Packag. Technol. Sci., 26 (2013), pp. 187-200. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Julia, C. and Hercberg, S.: Nutri-Score: Evidence of the effectiveness of the French front-of-pack nutrition label, Ernaehrungsumschau, 64 (2017), no. 12, pp. 181-187. [Google Scholar]
  13. Cyclos HTP: Verification and examination of recyclability. Version 4.0. https://www.cyclos-htp.de/publications/r-a-catalogue. Accessed 16 July 2021 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  14. Manfredi, S.; Allacker, K.; Chomkhamsri, K.; Pelletier, N. and de Souza, D. M.: Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) Guide (2012). [Google Scholar]
  15. Maga, D.; Thonemann, N.; Strothmann, P. and Sonnemann, G.: How to account for plastic emissions in life cycle inventory analysis?, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 168 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  16. Woods, J. S.; Verones, F.; Jolliet, O.; Vázquez-Rowe, I. and Boulay, A.-M.: A framework for the assessment of marine litter impacts in life cycle impact assessment, Ecol. Indic., 129 (2021), no. 11. [Google Scholar]
  17. Van den Adel, F.; Scagnetti, C.; Lorenz, M.; Krieg, H. and Albrecht, S.: Plastik‐Index PLIX macht Verpackungen vergleichbar, Chem. Unserer Zeit, 55 (2021), no. 3, pp. 192-198. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.