Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 349, 2022
10th International Conference on Life Cycle Management (LCM 2021)
Article Number 04006
Number of page(s) 7
Section Construction and Renovation of Buildings
Published online 20 May 2022
  1. T. Ebert, N. Eßig, G. Hauser, DETAIL Green Books, Zertifizierungssysteme für Gebäude, (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. N. Bertram, S. Fuchs, J. Mischke, R. Palter, G. Strube, J. Woetzel, Modular construction: From projects to products, 3 – 9, (2019) [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Molav, D. L. Barral, Procedia Engineering, A Construction Procurement Method to Achieve Sustainability in Modular Construction, 145, 1362 – 1369, (2016) [Google Scholar]
  4. M. L. De La Torre, A review and analysis of modular construction practices, 275, (2016) [Google Scholar]
  5. D. Hořínková, Advantages and Disadvantages of Modular Construction, including Environmental Impacts, in: IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., 1203 032002, (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. K. Subramanya, S. Kermanshachi, B. Rouhanizadeh, Modular Construction vs. Traditional Construction: Advantages and Limitations: A Comparative Study, in Proceedings of the Creative Construction e-Conference 2020, CCC 2020, 11 – 19, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  7. L. Loizou, K. Barati, X. Shen, B. Li, Buildings, Quantifying Advantages of Modular Construction: Waste Generation, 11, 622, 2021 [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Z. Hamedani, F. Huber, A comparative study of DGNB, LEED and BREEAM certificate systems in urban sustainability, in: 7th International Conference on Urban Regeneration and Sustainability, 121 – 132, (2012) [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Eberl, DGNB vs. LEED: A comparative analysis, in: Conference on Central Europe towards Sustainable Building, 1 – 5, (2010) [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Orova, A. Reith, Multiscalarity in International Sustainable Assessment Systems: A Qualitative Comparison of LEED, CASBEE, BREEAM, DGNB and ESTIDAMA on Building, Neighbourhood and City Scale, in: IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ, 290 012056, (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. R. K. Zimmermann, O. Skjelmose, K. G. Jenson, K. K. Jensen, H. Birgisdottir, Categorizing Building Certification Systems According to the Definition of Sustainable Building, in: IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 471, 092060, (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. DGNB GmbH, [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Rezaallah, C. M. Bolognesi, R. A. Khoraskani, LEED and BREEAM; Comparison between policies, assessment criteria and calculation methods, in: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Building Sustainability Assessment, (2012) [Google Scholar]
  14. P. Schwerdtner, T. Kessel, C. Roth, S. A. Kian, M. Bucherer, D. Möhlmann, F. Schippmann, R. Sonntag, T. Uhlendorf, S. Wahnes, OI + BAU – Optimierung der Initiierung komplexer Bauvorhaben, Forschungsbericht im Rahmen der Forschungsinitiative Zukunft Bau, F 3140, (2019) [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Lara, C. S. Poon, Construction Management and Economics, Sustainable construction aspects of using prefabrication in dense urban environment: a Hong Kong case study, 26.9, 953 – 966, (2008) [Google Scholar]
  16. R. M. Lawson, R. G. Ogden, Sustainability and Process Benefits of Modular Construction, in TG57 ‐ Industrialisation in Construction, CIB World Building Congress 2010, 38 – 51, (2010) [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Kamali, K. Hewage, Journal of Cleaner Production, Development of performance criteria for sustainability evaluation of modular versus conventional construction methods, 142-4, 3592 – 3606, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  18. N. Banaitienea, A. Banaitisa, A. Kaklauskasa, E. Zavadskas, Omega, Evaluating the life cycle of a building: A multivariant and multiple criteria approach, 36-3, 429 – 441, (2008) [Google Scholar]
  19. H. Xue, S. Zhang, Y. Su, Z. Wu, R. J. Yang, Journal of Cleaner Production, Effect of stakeholder collaborative management on off-site construction cost performance, 184, 290 – 502, (2018) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.