Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 349, 2022
10th International Conference on Life Cycle Management (LCM 2021)
Article Number 04011
Number of page(s) 6
Section Construction and Renovation of Buildings
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202234904011
Published online 20 May 2022
  1. UNEP, “2021 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction: Towards a Zero-emission, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector,” 2021. [Google Scholar]
  2. UNECE, “UNECE Statistical Database,” 2021. https://w3.unece.org/PXWeb2015/pxweb/en/STAT/. [Google Scholar]
  3. INSEE, “Statistiques et études Emploi salarié par secteur,” 2021. [Google Scholar]
  4. CITEPA, “Données chiffrées SECTEN 2020.” 2020, [Online]. Available: https://www.citepa.org/fr/secten/. [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Beck, O. Ribon, and N. Riedinger, “Chiffres clés de l’énergie Édition 2020,” p. 80, 2020, [Online]. [Google Scholar]
  6. R. Frischknecht et al., “LCA and decision making: when and how to use consequential LCA; 62nd LCA forum, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zürich, 9 September 2016,” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 296–301, 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Zamagni, J. B. Guinée, R. Heijungs, P. Masoni, and A. Raggi, “Lights and shadows in consequential LCA,” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 904–918, 2012, doi:10.1007/s11367-012-0423-x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Andreasi Bassi, D. Tonini, T. Ekvall, and T. F. Astrup, “A life cycle assessment framework for large-scale changes in material circularity,” Waste Manag., vol. 135, no. October, pp. 360–371, 2021, doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2021.09.018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. D. T. L. Almeida, C. Charbuillet, C. Heslouin, A. Lebert, and N. Perry, “Economic models used in consequential life cycle assessment : a literature review,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 90, pp. 187–191, 2020, doi:10.1016/j.procir.2020.01.057. [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Berg, B. Hartley, and O. Richters, “A stock-flow consistent input-output model with applications to energy price shocks, interest rates, and heat emissions,” New J. Phys., vol. 17, 2015, doi:10.1088/1367-2630/17/1/015011. [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Caiani, A. Godin, E. Caverzasi, M. Gallegati, S. Kinsella, and J. E. Stiglitz, “Agent based-stock flow consistent macroeconomics : Towards a benchmark model,” J. Econ. Dyn. Control, vol. 69, pp. 375–408, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. W. Godley and M. Lavoie, Monetary Economics: An Integrated Approach to Credit, Money, Income, Production and Wealth. 2007. [Google Scholar]
  13. N. Assembly, Finance Bill for 2014 / N° 1395 Projet de loi de finances pour 2014. 2013. [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Nauleau and A. Saussay, “ADEME’s techno-economic model of the residential sector ‘ MENFIS logement’, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Merciai and J. Schmidt, “Methodology for the Construction of Global Multi-Regional Hybrid Supply and Use Tables for the EXIOBASE v3 Database,” J. Ind. Ecol., vol. 22, 2016, doi: doi:10.1111/jiec.12713. [Google Scholar]
  16. A. de Koning, R. Heijungs, and A. Tukker, “TECHNICAL REPORT : Full EXIOBASE database,” 2011. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.