EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 349 (2022) E3S Web Conf., 349 (2022) 12003 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 349, 2022
10th International Conference on Life Cycle Management (LCM 2021)
Article Number 12003
Number of page(s) 7
Section Digital Solutions for Industry and Society
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202234912003
Published online 20 May 2022
  1. Flipped Learning Network (2014). What is flipped learning? The four pillars of F-L-I-P. Retrieved August 29, 2021, from http://www.flippedlearning.org/definition. [Google Scholar]
  2. S. B. Velegol, S. E. Zappe, E. Mahoney, E. (2015). Adv. in Eng. Ed., 4, 1–37 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  3. L. Johnson, S. Adams Becker, V. Estrada, A. Freeman. NMC Horizon Report: 2014 library edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium, (2014) [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Karabulut-Ilgu, N. Jaramillo Cherrez, C.T. Jahren. Br. J. of Ed. Techn. 49, 398-411. (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. W. Hung, D.H. Jonassen, R. Liu, Problem-Based Learning. In J. M. Spector, J. G. van Merrienboer, M. D., Merrill, & M. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (3 ed., pp. 485-506). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. (2008) [Google Scholar]
  6. D.E. Allen, R.S. Donham, S.A. Bernhardt, New Dir. Teach. Learn. 128, 21–29 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Andriessen, M. Pardijs, M. J. Baker, Getting on and getting along: Tension in the development of collaboration. In M. J. Baker, J. Andriessen, & S. Järvelä (Eds.), Affective learning together: Social and emotional dimensions of collaborative learning (pp. 205–230). New York, NY: Routledge. (2013) [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Gade, S. Chari, Adv, in Phys. Ed. 37,4 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  9. S. J. Karau, K. D. Williams, Curr. Dir. in Psych. Sc., 4, 5 (1995) [Google Scholar]
  10. J. F. Vivas, V. Allada. Int. J. Engng Ed. 22, 2 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Yadav, C. Mayfield, N. Zhou, S. Hambrusch, T. Korb, ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 14, 1 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. P. Coughlan, D. Coghlan, Int. J. of Oper. & Prod. Man., 22, 2 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Mocellin, N. Sandström, S. Tegazi with R. Balkenende, P. Danese, J. Faludi, P. Ferro, R. Graf, K. Grönman, L. Macchion, J. Nuortila-Jokinen, S. I. Olsen, E. Polat, A. Toghyani. Teaching Circular Economy: An interactive and multi-disciplinary approach. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of EurOMA, July 5-7, 2021, Berlin, Germany (online) (2021) [Google Scholar]
  14. J. J. Gibson, The theory of affordances. In Robert E Shaw, John Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing: toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67–82), Hillsdale, N.J. : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (1977) [Google Scholar]
  15. J. J. Gibson, The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,Inc. (Original work published 1979) (1986) [Google Scholar]
  16. D. A. Norman, The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books.(1988) [Google Scholar]
  17. D. A. Norman, Des. Int.: Psych. at the Human-Comp. Interf. 1, 1 (1991) [Google Scholar]
  18. D. A. Norman, Interact. 6, 3 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  19. N. Sandström, A. Nevgi, K. Grönman, R. Balkenende, P. Danese, R. Graf, J. Holopainen, S. I. Olsen, A. Toghyani (manuscript in preparation). Affordances for Learning: From Case Studies to a Tool to Assess Learning in the Context of Circular Economy. [Google Scholar]
  20. N. Dabbagh, S. Dass, S. (2013). CATS: A Tool for Identifying the Cognitive Affordances of Learning Technologies. In M. Simonson (Ed.), 36 th Annual Proceeding. Selected Papers on the Practice of Educational Communications (pp. 401–412). (2013) [Google Scholar]
  21. N. Sandström, A. Nevgi, J. Simolin, K. Mälkki. Osallistava opintojakson ediste: miksi aika aloittaa oli eilen? (In English: Participatory course feedforward: why the time to start was yesterday?) In H. Pesonen & J. H. Nieminen (Eds.) Huomioi oppimisen esteet: Inklusiivinen opetus korkeakoulutuksessa (pp. 293-307). Jyväskylä: PS-Kustannus. (2021) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.