Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 349, 2022
10th International Conference on Life Cycle Management (LCM 2021)
Article Number 13002
Number of page(s) 9
Section Life Cycle Management and the Sustainable Development Goals
Published online 20 May 2022
  1. DeSimone, L., & Popoff, F. (2000). Eco-efficiency: The Business Link to Sustainable Development. Cambridge: MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  2. SANS. (2014). SANS 14045: 2014 South African National Standard Environmental Management: Eco-efficiency Assessment of Product Systems – Principles, Requirements and Guidelines (Issue 014). [Google Scholar]
  3. Mickwitz, P., Melanen, M., Rosenström, U., & Seppälä, J. (2006). Regional ecoefficiency indicators a participatory approach. JCP, 14(18), 1603–1611. [Google Scholar]
  4. Saling, P., Kicherer, A., Dittrich-Krämer, B., Wittlinger, R., Zombik, W., & Schmidt, I., Schrott, W., & Schmidt, S. (2002). Life cycle management eco-efficiency analysis by BASF: The method. The International JLA, 7(4), 203–218. [Google Scholar]
  5. Permpool, N., Mahmood, A., & Ghani, H. U. (2021). An Eco-Efficiency Assessment of Bio-Based Diesel Substitutes: A Case Study in Thailand. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  6. Caiado, R. G. G., de Freitas Dias, R., Mattos, L. V., Quelhas, O. L. G., & Leal Filho, W. (2017). Towards sustainable development through the perspective of eco-efficiency A systematic literature review. JCP, 165, 890–904. [Google Scholar]
  7. Secchi, M., Corrado, S., Beylot, A., Sala, S., & Sany, E. (2019). Assessing the decoupling of economic growth from environmental impacts in the European Union: A consumption-based approach. JCP, 236, 117535. [Google Scholar]
  8. Stanchev, P., & Ribarova, I. (2016). Complexity, assumptions, and solutions for ecoefficiency assessment of urban water systems. JCP, 138, 229–236. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lorenzo-Toja, Y., Vázquez-Rowe, I., Amores, M. J., Termes-Rifé, M., Marín-Navarro, D., Moreira, M. T., & Feijoo, G. (2016). Benchmarking wastewater treatment plants from an eco-efficiency perspective. STE, 566–567, 468–479. [Google Scholar]
  10. Petit-Boix, A., Arnal, C., Marín, D., Josa, A., Gabarrell, X., & Rieradevall, J. (2018). Addressing the life cycle of sewers in contrasting cities through an eco-efficiency approach. JIE, 22(5), 1092–1104. [Google Scholar]
  11. Todorovic, M., Mehmeti, A., & Scardigno, A. (2016). Eco-efficiency of agricultural water systems: Methodological approach and assessment at meso-level scale. JEM, 165, 62–71. [Google Scholar]
  12. Laso, J., García-Herrero, I., Margallo, M., Vázquez-Rowe, I., Fullana, P., Bala, A., Gazulla, C., Irabien, Á., & Aldaco, R. (2018). Finding an economic and environmental balance in value chains based on circular economy thinking: An eco-efficiency methodology applied to the fish canning industry. JRCR, May 2017, 0–1. [Google Scholar]
  13. Levidow, L., Lindgaard-Jørgensen, P., Nilsson, Å., Skenhall, S. A., & Assimacopoulos, D. (2016). Process eco-innovation: Assessing meso-level eco-efficiency in industrial water-service systems. JCP, 110, 54–65. [Google Scholar]
  14. Burchart-Korol, D., Krawczyk, P., Czaplicka-Kolarz, K., & Smolin, A. (2016). Ecoefficiency of underground coal gasification (UCG) for electricity production. Fuel, 173(1), 239–246. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Huppes, G., & Ishikawa, M. (2005). A framework for quantified eco-efficiency analysis. JIE, 9(4), 25–41. [Google Scholar]
  16. International Standards Organization (ISO 14040), 2006a. Environmental management -Life cycle assessment Principles and framework; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
  17. International Standards Organization (ISO 14044), 2006b. Environmental management -life cycle assessment–requirements and guidelines. Geneva (CH) Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hoffrén, Jukka, and Eeva Lotta Apajalahti. 2009. “Emergent Eco-Efficiency Paradigm in Corporate Environment Management.” Sustainable Development 17(4): 233–43. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.