Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 353, 2022
8th International Conference on Energy and City of the Future (EVF’2021)
Article Number 02003
Number of page(s) 5
Section Energy & Management
Published online 29 June 2022
  1. M. Ehsani, K. V. Singh, H. O. Bansal, and R. T. Mehrjardi, “State of the Art and Trends in Electric and Hybrid Electric Vehicles,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 109, no. 6, pp. 967–984, (Jun. 2021), doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2021.3072788. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Y. A. Alamoudi, A. Ferrah, R. Panduranga, A. Althobaiti, and F. Mulolani, “State-of- the Art Electrical Machines for Modern Electric Vehicles,” 2019 Adv. Sci. Eng. Technol. Int. Conf. ASET2019, (May. 2019), doi: 10.1109/ICASET.2019.8714343. [Google Scholar]
  3. D. Jiang, J. Chen, and Z. Shen, “Common mode EMI reduction through PWM methods for three-phase motor controller,” CES Trans. Electr. Mach. Syst., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 133–142, (Jun 2019), doi: 10.30941/CESTEMS.2019.00019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Kwak and S. K. Mun, “Model predictive control methods to reduce common-mode voltage for three-phase voltage source inverters,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 5019–5035, (Sep. 2015), doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2014.2362762. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Uddin, G. Mirzaeva, P. Stepien, L. De Lillo, L. Empringham, and F. Rojas, “Common mode voltage mitigation in industrial three-phase inverters based on model predictive control,” 2018 IEEE Ind. Appl. Soc. Annu. Meet. IAS 2018, (Nov. 2018), doi: 10.1109/IAS.2018.8544619. [Google Scholar]
  6. X. Wu, G. Tan, Z. Ye, Y. Liu, and S. Xu, “Optimized common-mode voltage reduction PWM for three-phase voltage-source inverters,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 2959–2969, (Apr. 2016), doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2015.2451673. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Z. Wang et al., “Reduction of common mode voltage of 2-level voltage source inverter-fed machine,” 2017 Asian Conf. Energy, Power Transp. Electrif ACEPT 2017, vol. 2017-December, pp. 1–5, (Dec. 2017), doi: 10.1109/ACEPT.2017.8168574. [Google Scholar]
  8. E. Ün and A. M. Hava, “A near state PWM method with reduced switching frequency and reduced common mode voltage for three-phase voltage source inverters,” Proc. IEEE Int. Electr. Mach. Drives Conf. IEMDC 2007, vol. 1, pp. 235–240, (2007), doi: 10.1109/IEMDC.2007.383583. [Google Scholar]
  9. F. Abdelaziz, Z. E. Azzouz, and A. Omari, “Common mode voltage mitigation using a new modified model predictive control (MMPC) in a three phase voltage source inverter,” 6th IEEE Int. Energy Conf. ENERGYCon 2020, pp. 93–97, (Sep. 2020), doi: 10.1109/ENERGYCon48941.2020.9236546. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Xie, X. Li, F. Wu, X. Wu, M. Ji, and D. Yu, “A Voltage Vector Based Model Predictive Control to Suppress Common-Mode Voltage with Current Ripple Constraint for Two-Level PMSM Inverters,” 2021 IEEE Int. Conf. Predict. Control Electr. Drives Power Electron., pp. 142–146, (Nov. 2021), doi: 10.1109/PRECEDE51386.2021.9681042. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Cortés, M. P. Kazmierkowski, R. M. Kennel, D. E. Quevedo, and J. Rodriguez, “Predictive control in power electronics and drives,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 4312–4324, (2008), doi: 10.1109/TIE.2008.2007480. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. P. Karamanakos, E. Liegmann, T. Geyer, and R. Kennel, “Model Predictive Control of Power Electronic Systems: Methods, Results, and Challenges,” IEEE Open J. Ind. Appl., vol. 1, pp. 95–114, (2020), doi: 10.1109/ojia.2020.3020184. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. S. K. Mun and S. Kwak, “Reducing common-mode voltage of three-phase VSIs using the predictive current control method based on reference voltage,” J. Power Electron., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 712–720, (Jan. 2015), doi: 10.6113/JPE.2015.15.3.712. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. P. C. Jose Rodriguez, J. Rodriguez, and P. Cortes, Predictive Control of Power Converters and Electrical Drives. John Wiley & Sons, (2012). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.