EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 358 (2022) E3S Web Conf., 358 (2022) 02036 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 358, 2022
5th International Conference on Green Energy and Sustainable Development (GESD 2022)
Article Number 02036
Number of page(s) 4
Section Regular Contributions
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202235802036
Published online 27 October 2022
  1. Bachu S. Identification of oil reservoirs suitable for CO2- EOR and CO2 storage (CCUS) using reserves databases, with application to Alberta, Canada. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 2016;44:152–165. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Qin J, Han H, Liu X. Application and enlightenment of carbon dioxide flooding in the United States of America. Petroleum Exploration and Development. 2015;42:232–40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lv G, Li Q, Wang S, Li X. Key techniques of reservoir engineering and injection-production process for CO2 flooding in China's SINOPEC Shengli Oilfield. Journal of CO2 Utilization. 2015;11:31–40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. He L, Shen P, Liao X, Gao Q, Wang C, Li F. Study on CO2 EOR and its geological sequestration potential in oil field around Yulin city. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 2015;134:199–204. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. BGS. Best practice for the storage of CO2 in saline aquifers. Nottingham, UK. 2008. [Google Scholar]
  6. IEA. CCS site characterisation criteria. 2009. [Google Scholar]
  7. EPA. Class II oil and gas related injection wells. United States Environ Prot Agency 2019. [Google Scholar]
  8. Center for Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology Survey, CGS. Explanation of Suitability Evaluation Map of CO2 [Google Scholar]
  9. Geological Storage in Main Sedimentary Basins in China and Its Adjacent Sea Area. Geological Publishing House BEIJING 2017. [Google Scholar]
  10. Cai B, Li Q, Liu G, Liu L, Jin T, Shi H. Environmental concern-based site screening of carbon dioxide geological storage in China. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:7598. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Sun Liang. Research on China CCUS Source-Sink Matching Decision Support System: Tsinghua University; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  12. Yong Li. Source-sink matching model for carbon capture and storage (CCS) and its application - a case study in Hebei Province: Tsinghua University; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  13. Sanchez DL, Johnson N, McCoy ST, Turner PA, Mach KJ. Near-term deployment of carbon capture and sequestration from biorefineries in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2018;115:4875. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fan J-L, Shen S, Wei S-J, Xu M, Zhang X. Near-term CO2 storage potential for coal-fired power plants in China: A county-level source-sink matching assessment. Applied Energy. 2020;279:115878. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Resource Environmental Science and Data Center. National Nature Reserve Boundary Data. 2018. [Google Scholar]
  16. Xinliang Xu. A Kilometer Grid Dataset of Population Spatial Distribution in China. 2017 Data Registration and Publishing System of Resource and Environmental Science Data Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences. [Google Scholar]
  17. Civil Aviation Administration of China. 2019 civil aviation airport production statistics bulletin. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  18. National Geographic Information Resource Directory Service System. 1: 250000 national basic geographic database. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ecological function zoning database. Ecological Function Zoning Database: Importance of Ecological Service Functions in China. 2020. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lehner B, Liermann C.R., Revenga, C., Vörösmarty, C., Fekete, B., Crouzet, P., Döll, P., Endejan, M., Frenken, K., Magome, J. Global reservoir and dam (grand) database. Technical Documentation. 1 ed 2011. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.