EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 359 (2022) E3S Web Conf., 359 (2022) 05003 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 359, 2022
The 7th International Conference on Energy, Environment, Epidemiology and Information System (ICENIS 2022)
Article Number 05003
Number of page(s) 15
Section Information System Management and Environment
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202235905003
Published online 31 October 2022
  1. A. J. Bokolo, “Application of telemedicine and eHealth technology for clinical services in response to Covid-19 pandemic” in Health and Technology, 11(2), 359–366 (2021). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. T. H. Tebeje and J. Klein, “Applications of e-Health to Support Person-Centered Health Care at the Time of Covid-19 Pandemic” in Telemedicine and E-Health, 27(2), 150–158 (2021). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. M. E. Zubair, G. Liang, M. M. Jawad, S. Dilawar, and B. Ilyas, “Fear of Covid-19 and Intentions towards Adopting E-Health Services: Exploring the Technology Acceptance Model in the Scenario of Pandemic” in International Journal of Business, Economics and Management, 8(4), 270–291 (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. W. Wang, L. Sun, T. Liu, and T. Lai, “The use of E-health during the Covid-19 pandemic: a case study in China’s Hubei province. Health Sociology Review” (2021). [Google Scholar]
  5. P. Webster, Virtual health care in the era of Covid-19 (Lancet, London, 2020), 395(10231), 1180–1181. [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Wosik, M. Fudim, B. Cameron, Z. F. Gellad, A. Cho, D. Phinney, and J. Tcheng, “Telehealth transformation: Covid-19 and the rise of virtual care” in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 27(6), 957–962 (2020). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. M. H. An, S. C. You, R. W. Park, and S. Lee, “Using an extended technology acceptance model to understand the factors influencing telehealth utilization after flattening the Covid-19 curve in South Korea: Cross-sectional survey study” in JMIR Medical Informatics, 9(1) (2021). [Google Scholar]
  8. A. A. Al-Fadhli, M. Othman, N. Ali, and B. A. Al-Jamrh, “Understanding health professionals’ intention to use telehealth in Yemen: Using the delone and McLean IS success model” in Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies 5, 627–638 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw, “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models” in Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003(1989). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. N. Hossain, F. Yokota, N. Sultana, and A. Ahmed, “Factors Influencing Rural End-Users’ Acceptance of e-Health in Developing Countries: A study on Portable Health Clinic in Bangladesh” in Telemedicine and E-Health, 25(3), 221–229 (2019). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. W. Delone, and E. McLean, “The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update” in Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30 (2003). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. T. Dahlberg, N. Mallat, and A. Öörni, “Trust enhanced technology acceptance model - consumer acceptance of mobile payment solutions” in Stockholm Mobility Roundtable, 22–23 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  13. K. Antypas, and S.C Wangberg, “An internet- and mobile-based tailored intervention to enhance maintenance of physical activity after cardiac rehabilitation: Short-term results of a randomized controlled trial” in Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(3), 1–20 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Mardiana, J. H. Tjakraatmadja,and A. Aprianingsih, “DeLone-Mclean information system success model revisited: The separation of intention to Use - Use and the integration of technology acceptance models” in International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 172–182 (5 July 2015). [Google Scholar]
  15. I. O. Adeyemi, and A. O. Issa, “Integrating Information System Success Model (ISSM) And Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): Proposing Students’ Satisfaction with University Web Portal Model” in Record and Library Journal, 6(1), 69 (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Seivert and M. E. Badowski, “The Rise of Telemedicine: Lessons from a Global Pandemic” in European Medical Journal, 5(1), 64–69 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  17. D. Gu, S. Khan, I. U. Khan, S. U. Khan, Y. Xie, X. Li, and G. Zhang, “Assessing the Adoption of e-Health Technology in a Developing Country: An Extension of the UTAUT Model” in SAGE Open, 11(3) (2021). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Rahi, M. M. Khan, and M. Alghizzawi, “Factors influencing the adoption of telemedicine health services during COVID-19 pandemic crisis: an integrative research model” in Enterprise Information Systems, 15(6), 769–793 (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. N. Aeni Hidayah, N. Hasanati, R. Novela Putri, R., K. Fiqry Musa, Z. Nihayah, Z., and A. Muin, “Analysis Using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and DeLone McLean Information System (DM IS) Success Model of AIS Mobile User Acceptance” in 2020 8th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management, CITSM (2020) [Google Scholar]
  20. D. Blumenthal and J. P. Glaser, “Information technology comes to medicine” in New England Journal of Medicine, 356(24), pp.2527-2534 (2007). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. N. Sun and P. L. P. Rau, “The acceptance of personal health devices among patients with chronic conditions” in International Journal of Medical Informatics, 84(4), 288–297 (2015). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Fishbein and I. Ajzen, “Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research” in Philosophy and Rhetoric, 10(2) (1977.). [Google Scholar]
  23. J. B. Lohmoller, “The PLS program system: Latent variables path analysis with partial least squares estimation” in Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23(1), pp.125-127 (1988). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Monecke and F. Leisch, “semPLS: Structural Equation Modeling Using Partial Least Squares” in Journal of Statistical Software, 48(3), 1–32 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. J. Hair, C. L. Hollingsworth, A. B. Randolph, A. B, and A. Y. L Chong, “An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research” in Industrial Management and Data Systems, 117(3), 442–458 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. V. W. Sujarweni and P. Endrayanto, Statistika untuk penelitian. (Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta, 2012)14, p.17. [Google Scholar]
  27. M. R. Hoque, Y. Bao, and G. Sorwar, “Investigating factors influencing the adoption of e-Health in developing countries: A patient’s perspective” in Informatics for Health and Social Care, 42(1), 1–17 (2017). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. J. Kim and H. A. Park, “Development of a health information technology acceptance model using consumers’ health behavior intention” in Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(5), 1–14 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  29. A. Gadabu, K. Sunguh, V. E. Arkorful, M. M. Uddin, and S. Lukman, “Examining Trust as a Key Determinant of eHealth Adoption in Malawi” 1–14 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  30. N. Gorla, T. M. Somers, and B. Wong, “Organizational impact of system quality, information quality, and service quality” in Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19(3), 207–228 (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. R. K. N. Jandavath and A. Byram, “Healthcare service quality effect on patient satisfaction and behavioural intentions in corporate hospitals in India” in International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing, 10(1), 48–74 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. M. A. Kaium, Y. Bao, M. Z. Alam, and M. R. Hoque, “Understanding continuance usage intention of mHealth in a developing country: An empirical investigation” in International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing, 14(2), 251–272 (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. M. Isaković, U. Sedlar, M. Volk, and J. Bešter, “Usability pitfalls of diabetes mHealth apps for the elderly” Journal of Diabetes Research, 1–9 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  34. A. H. Pratono and A. Maharani, “Long-Term Care in Indonesia: The Role of Integrated Service Post for Elderly” in Journal of Aging and Health, 30(10), 1556–1573 (2018). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. W. W. Chin, “The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling” (1998). [Google Scholar]
  36. I. Ghozali and H. Latan, Partial least square concepts, methods and applications using the WarpPLS 5.0 program (Semarang, Universitas Diponegoro, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  37. J. Sarwono and U. Narimawati, Membuat skripsi, tesis, dan disertasi dengan partial least square sem (pls-sem). (ANDI, Yogyakarta, 2015). [Google Scholar]
  38. C. Fornell and D. F. Larcker, “Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics” (1981). [Google Scholar]
  39. A. Nomura, et al, “Clinical efficacy of telemedicine compared to face-to-face clinic visits for smoking cessation: Multicenter open-label randomized controlled noninferiority trial” in Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(4) (2019). [Google Scholar]
  40. E. Purwanto and V. Budiman, “Applying the technology acceptance model to investigate the intention to use e-health: a conceptual framework” in Technology Reports of Kansai University, 62(05) (2020), pp.2569-2580. [Google Scholar]
  41. K. M. Zobair, L. Sanzogni, and K. Sandhu, “Expectations of telemedicine health service adoption in rural Bangladesh” in Social Science & Medicine, 238, 112485 (2019). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. E. V. Wilson and N. K. Lankton, “Predicting patients' use of provider-delivered e-health: The role of facilitating conditions” in Patient-centered e-health, pp. 217-229. [Google Scholar]
  43. M. A. Zayyad and M. Toycan, “Factors affecting sustainable adoption of e-health technology in developing countries: An exploratory survey of Nigerian hospitals from the perspective of healthcare professionals” in Peer Journal, 6, e4436 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.