EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 359 (2022) E3S Web Conf., 359 (2022) 05005 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 359, 2022
The 7th International Conference on Energy, Environment, Epidemiology and Information System (ICENIS 2022)
Article Number 05005
Number of page(s) 8
Section Information System Management and Environment
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202235905005
Published online 31 October 2022
  1. S. Vinerean, C. Budac, L.A. Baltador, D.C. Dabija. Assessing the Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on M-Commerce Adoption: An Adapted UTAUT2 Approach. Electron 2022, Vol 11, Page 1269. 2022 Apr 17;11(8):1269. [Google Scholar]
  2. E. Turban, J. Outland, D. King, J.K. Lee, T.P. Liang, D.C. Turban. Mobile Commerce and the Internet of Things. In: Springer International Publishing. Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 205–48. [Google Scholar]
  3. Mordor Intelligence. Mobile Commerce Market - Growth, Trends, COVID-19 Impact, and Forecasts (2022 - 2027) [Internet]. 2022 Jun [cited 2022 Jul 10]. Available from: https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/4591829/mobile-commerce-market-growth-trends-covid-19 [Google Scholar]
  4. N. Yuduang, A.K.S Ong, Y.T. Prasetyo, T. Chuenyindee, P. Kusonwattana, W. Limpasart, et al. Factors Influencing the Perceived Effectiveness of COVID-19 Risk Assessment Mobile Application MorChana in Thailand: UTAUT2 Approach. Int J Environ Res Public Heal 2022, Vol 19, Page 5643. 2022 May 6;19(9):5643. [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Ashoer, I. Murdifin, J. Basalamah, A. As’ad, A. Pramukti. Integrating Social Commerce Constructs into Mobile Application Service; A Structural Equation Model. J Phys Conf Ser. 2021;1783(1). [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Dryhurst, C.R. Schneider, J. Kerr, A.L.J. Freeman, G. Recchia, A.M. van der Bles, et al. Risk perceptions of COVID-19 around the world. J Risk Res. 2020 May 5;1–13. [Google Scholar]
  7. V. Venkatesh, M.G. Morris, G.B. Davis, F.D. Davis. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q Manag Inf Syst. 2003;27(3):425–78. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. V. Venkatesh, J.Y.L. Thong, X. Xu. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q Manag Inf Syst. 2012;36(1):157–78. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Verma, A. Gustafsson. Investigating the emerging COVID-19 research trends in the field of business and management: A bibliometric analysis approach. J Bus Res. 2020 Sep 1;118:253–61. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. R.J. Vallerand, M.S. Fortier, F. Guay. Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: Toward a motivational model of high school dropout. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997;72(5):1161–76. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. L. Deci. Edward, M. Ryan. Richard. Handbook of Self-determination Research. The University of Ronchester Press; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  12. P.K. Chopdar, N. Korfiatis, V.J. Sivakumar, M.D. Lytras. Mobile shopping apps adoption and perceived risks: A cross-country perspective utilizing the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Comput Human Behav. 2018 Sep 1;86:109–28. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Mashur, B.I. Gunawan, Fitriany, M. Ashoer, M. Hidayat,H.P.KP. Aditya. Moving from traditional to society 5.0: Case study by online transportation business. J Distrib Sci. 2019;17(9). [Google Scholar]
  14. B. Kim, E. Lee. What Factors Affect a User’s Intention to Use Fitness Applications? The Moderating Effect of Health Status: A Cross-Sectional Study. Inquiry. 2022 May 17;59:469580221095826. [Google Scholar]
  15. H.V. Osei, K.O. Kwateng, K.A. Boateng. Integration of personality trait, motivation and UTAUT 2 to understand e-learning adoption in the era of COVID-19 pandemic. Educ Inf Technol. 2022 Apr 20;1–26. [Google Scholar]
  16. C.H. Hsiao, J.J. Chang, K.Y. Tang. Exploring the influential factors in continuance usage of mobile social apps: Satisfaction, habit, and customer value perspectives. Telemat Informatics. 2016 May 1;33(2):342–55. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. W. Nadeem, M. Juntunen, J. Juntunen. Consumer segments in social commerce: A latent class approach. J Consum Behav. 2017 May;16(3):279–92. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. C. Tam, D. Santos, T. Oliveira. Exploring the influential factors of continuance intention to use mobile Apps: Extending the expectation confirmation model. Inf Syst Front 2018 221. 2018 May 31;22(1):243–57. [Google Scholar]
  19. G. Zhu, K.K.F. So, S. Hudson. Inside the sharing economy: Understanding consumer motivations behind the adoption of mobile applications. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag. 2017;29(9):2218–39. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. R.J. Vallerand, R. Koestner, L.G. Pelletier. Reflections on self-determination theory. Can Psychol. 2008 Aug;49(3):257–62. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. G. Pietrabissa, A. Rossi, M. Borrello, G.M. Manzoni, S. Mannarini, G. Castelnuovo, et al. Development and Validation of a Self-Determination Theory-Based Measure of Motivation to Exercise and Diet in Children. Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 30;11:1299. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Bryman, E. Bell. Business Research Methods. 4th Ed. UK: Oxford University Press; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  23. R. Palau-Saumell, S. Forgas-Coll, J. Sánchez-García, E. Robres. User Acceptance of Mobile Apps for Restaurants: An Expanded and Extended UTAUT-2. Sustain 2019, Vol 11, Page 1210. 2019 Feb 25;11(4):1210. [Google Scholar]
  24. J. Li, X. Liu, L. Ma, W. Zhang. Users’ intention to continue using social fitness-tracking apps: expectation confirmation theory and social comparison theory perspective. Informatics Heal Soc Care. 2019 Jul 3;44(3):298–312. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Sarstedt, C.M. Ringle, J.F. Hair. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Handb Mark Res. 2021;1–47. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.