Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 361, 2022
3rd International Conference on Agribusiness and Rural Development (IConARD 2022)
Article Number 03020
Number of page(s) 11
Section Rural Environment Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202236103020
Published online 29 November 2022
  1. Indra, R., 2021. Development of Various Fruit Processing as a Culinary Tourism Attraction in Dokan Village, Brand District, Karo Regency. Tourism Economics, Hospitality, And Business Management Journal, 1(2), pp.181–193. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sartika, S.H., Mashud, M., Hasan, M., Syam, A., Susilowati, E., Purba, B., Arfandi, S.N., Jufri, M., Faried, A.I., Rosihana, R.E. and Raditya, A., 2022. Ekonomi Kreatif. Yayasan Kita Menulis. Ardianty, M. E., Murdianto. 2018. Dampak Industrialisasi Pedesaan Terhadap Kesejahteraan Rumah Tangga. Jurnal Sains Komunikasi dan Pengembangan Masyarakat Vol 2(5):627–638. [Google Scholar]
  3. Antara, M. and Yogantari, M.V., 2018, November. Keragaman Budaya Indonesia Sumber Inspirasi Inovasi Industri Kreatif. In SENADA (Seminar Nasional Manajemen, Desain dan Aplikasi Bisnis Teknologi) (Vol. 1, pp. 292–301). [Google Scholar]
  4. Sopanah, S.E., Bahri, S., Ghozali, M. and SH, M., 2020. Ekonomi Kreatif Berbasis Kearifan Lokal. Scopindo Media Pustaka. [Google Scholar]
  5. Edorita, W. and Jayakusuma, Z., 2018. Implementasi Nilai-Nilai Adat Dan Kearifan Lokal Dalam Melestarikan Hutan, Sungai Dan Danau Desa Buluh Cina Kecamatan Siak Hulu Kabupaten Kampar. Riau Law Journal, 2(2), pp.262–282. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chollisni, A., Syahrani, S., Shandy, A. and Anas, M., 2022. The concept of creative economy development-strengthening post COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Linguistics and Culture Review, 6, pp.413–426. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Duxbury, N. and Richards, G., 2019. Towards a research agenda for creative tourism: Developments, diversity, and dynamics. In A research agenda for creative tourism. Edward Elgar Publishing. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Steward, J.H., 1968. Cultural ecology. [Google Scholar]
  9. Damanik, S.E., 2019. Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Desa Sekitar Kawasan Hutan. Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hekmatyar, V. and Adinugraha, A.G., 2021. Ancaman Keberfungsian Sosial Pada Masyarakat di Dalam Kawasan Konservasi: Studi Kasus Desa Ranupani di Taman Nasional Bromo Tengger Semeru. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan, 7(1), pp.28–41. Hidayat, R., Andarini, S. 2020. Strategi Pemberdayaan UMKM di Pedesaan Berbasis Kearifan Lokal di Era [Google Scholar]
  11. Chaerul, M., Marbun, J., Destiarti, L., Armus, R., Marzuki, I., NNPS, R.I.N., Mohamad, E., Widodo, D., Tumpu, M., Tamim, T. and Firdaus, F., 2021. Pengantar Teknik Lingkungan. Yayasan Kita Menulis. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zaman, N., Syafrizal, S., Chaerul, M., Purba, S., Bachtiar, E., Simarmata, H.M.P., Basmar, E., Sudarmanto, E., Koesriwulandari, K. and Hastuti, P., 2021. Sumber Daya dan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat. Yayasan Kita Menulis. [Google Scholar]
  13. Purba, B., Nainggolan, L.E., Siregar, R.T., Chaerul, M., Simarmata, M.M., Bachtiar, E., Rahmadana, M.F., Marzuki, I. and Meganingratna, A., 2020. Ekonomi Sumber Daya Alam: Sebuah Konsep, Fakta dan Gagasan. Yayasan Kita Menulis. [Google Scholar]
  14. Berkes, F. and Jolly, D., 2002. Adapting to climate change: social-ecological resilience in a Canadian western Arctic community. Conservation ecology, 5(2). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. O’Neill, B.C., Kriegler, E., Ebi, K.L., Kemp-Benedict, E., Riahi, K., Rothman, D.S., van Ruijven, B.J., van Vuuren, D.P., Birkmann, J., Kok, K. and Levy, M., 2017. The roads ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century. Global environmental change, 42, pp.169–180. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Christian, Y., Desmiwati, D. and Damar, A., 2020. The Blessed Land: Internalization of Past Disaster into Culture by Sangihe’s Coastal Community. International Journal of Disaster Management, 3(1), pp.12–28. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schultz, E.A., 2014. New perspectives on organism-environment interactions in anthropology. Entangled Life, pp.79–102. [Google Scholar]
  18. Baer, H.A. and Singer, M., 2018. The anthropology of climate change: An integrated critical perspective. Routledge. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Karlsson, E.M., 2015. Changing seascapes: Local adaptation processes in Belizean fishing communities. [Google Scholar]
  20. Bennett, J.W., 2017. The ecological transition: cultural anthropology and human adaptation. Routledge. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Oliver-Smith, A., 2016. The concepts of adaptation, vulnerability, and resilience in the anthropology of climate change: considering the case of displacement and migration. Anthropology and climate change: From actions to transformations, 58. [Google Scholar]
  22. Boda, C.S. and Jerneck, A., 2019. Enabling local adaptation to climate change: towards collective action in Flagler Beach, Florida, USA. Climatic Change, 157(3), pp.631–649. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Triyanti, R., Kurniasari, N., Yuliaty, C., Muawanah, U. and Febrian, T., 2020, October. Management of coastal resources in Mandalika in an era of disruptive innovation waves. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 584, No. 1, p. 012064). IOP Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  24. Saepudin, E., Budiono, A. and Halimah, M., 2018. Development strategy of education tourism in Cibodas village in West Bandung regency. Journal of Environmental Management & Tourism, 9(8 (32)), pp.1684–1695. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hizbaron, D.R., Ismayani, N., Ernawan, F.N., Puspitasari, N.N.A., Yulianda, Y. and Jati, R., 2021. Comparative urban capacity analysis for flood-prone areas: method and a case study of Sidoarjo, Indonesia. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(9), pp.14027–14045. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Bec, A., McLennan, C.L. and Moyle, B.D., 2016. Community resilience to long-term tourism decline and rejuvenation: A literature review and conceptual model. Current Issues in Tourism, 19(5), pp.431–457. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Febrianto, F., 2017. Daya Dukung Lingkungan Berbasis Ecological FootPrint di Kelurahan Tamangapa Kota Makassar (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar). [Google Scholar]
  28. Abdoellah, O.S., 2020. Dari Ekologi Manusia Ke Ekologi Politik. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. [Google Scholar]
  29. Geertz, C., 1976. The religion of Java. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sosis, R., 2019. The building blocks of religious systems: Approaching religion as a complex adaptive system. In Evolution, Development and Complexity (pp. 421–449). Springer, Cham. [Google Scholar]
  31. Tucker, M.E. and Grim, J., 2016. The movement of religion and ecology. In Routledge handbook of religion and ecology (pp. 25–34). Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  32. Queirós, A., Faria, D. and Almeida, F., 2017. Strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods. European journal of education studies. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hancock, D.R., Algozzine, B. and Lim, J.H., 2021. Doing case study research: A practical guide for beginning researchers. [Google Scholar]
  34. Suryawati, E. and Osman, K., 2017. Contextual learning: Innovative approach towards the development of students’ scientific attitude and natural science performance. Eurasia Journal of mathematics, science and technology education, 14(1), pp.61–76. [Google Scholar]
  35. Merriam, S.B. and Tisdell, E.J., 2015. Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  36. Saldaña, J., 2021. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. sage. [Google Scholar]
  37. Yin, R.K. (1994). Case Study Research – Design and Methods 2ND Edition. California, Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  38. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2003). Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. [Google Scholar]
  39. Bogdan, R. C. dan Biklen, SK 1982. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods [Google Scholar]
  40. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage publications. [Google Scholar]
  41. Tisnawati, E., Natalia, D.A.R., Ratriningsih, D., Putro, A.R., Wirasmoyo, W. and Brotoatmodjo, H.P., 2019. Strategi Pengembangan Eko-Wisata Berbasis Masyarakat di Kampung Wisata Rejowinangun. INERSIA: lNformasi dan Ekspose hasil Riset teknik SIpil dan Arsitektur, 15(1), pp.1–11. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Trisakti, S.T.P., 2020. Pengaruh Fasilitas Terhadap Keputusan Menginap di Homestay Desa Cipasung, Kuningan. Jurnal Ilmiah Pariwisata, 25(1). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Nupus, T.T., 2020. Analisis Pengembangan Desa Wisata Melalui Kearifan Lokal Guna Meningkatkan Pendapatan Masyarakat dalam Perspektif Ekonomi Islam (Studi di Desa Kunjir Kecamatan Rajabasa Kabupaten Lampung Selatan) (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Raden Intan Lampung). [Google Scholar]
  44. Widyaningsih, H., 2016. Analisis Swot Dan Promosi Kerajinan Bambu Desa Wisata Brajan Kabupaten Sleman Yogyakarta. Khasanah Ilmu-Jurnal Pariwisata Dan Budaya, 3(2), pp.1–10. [Google Scholar]
  45. Nuraehan, N., Cikusin, Y. and Abidin, A.Z., 2020. PENGEMBANGAN DESA WISATA PANTAI (Studi Pada Pantai Lariti Desa Soro Kecematan Lambu Kabupaten Bima). Respon Publik, 14(4), pp.70–77. [Google Scholar]
  46. Fiske, S.T., 2018. Social beings: Core motives in social psychology. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  47. Davies, S., 2016. Adaptable livelihoods: Coping with food insecurity in the Malian Sahel. Springer. [Google Scholar]
  48. Dubos, R., Cooper, J. and Mechanic, D., 2017. So human an animal: How we are shaped by surroundings and events. Routledge. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Watts, M., 2019. On the poverty of theory: natural hazards research in context. In Interpretations of calamity (pp. 231–262). Routledge. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.