Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 361, 2022
3rd International Conference on Agribusiness and Rural Development (IConARD 2022)
Article Number 04016
Number of page(s) 8
Section Agricultural Technology and Smart Farming
Published online 29 November 2022
  1. J. Majesty, Argo & W.A. Nugroho.Journal of Tropical Agricultural Engineering and Biosystems. 3 (1) (2015) [Google Scholar]
  2. B. Santosa, L. Tantalu, & U. Sugiarti. Agricultural Technology Information and Scientific Communication Media. 10(1) (2019) [Google Scholar]
  3. B. Santosa, W. Wignyanto, N. Hidayat & S. Sucipto.Food Research. 4(4) (2020) [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Latumahina, A. Awan & D. Rumahlatu. Journal of Applied Biology Education. 4(1) (2017) [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Hamad, & K. Kristiono. Ilmiah Momentum Magazine. 9(1) (2013) [Google Scholar]
  6. B. R. Ramadhan, M. E, Safitri, S. I, Apriani, V, Raharjo, A. S, Titisgati, E. A, & Afifah, D. N. Journal of Nutrition College. 8(1) (2019) [Google Scholar]
  7. M.P, Safitri., M.W. Caronge., & F. Rohman. Journal of Agricultural Technology Education. 3(2) (2018) [Google Scholar]
  8. E. Wijayanti., U.S. Hastuti., & F. Rohman. Pros of Muhammadiyah Malang National Seminar (2016) [Google Scholar]
  9. P. lestari., N. Elfrida., A. Suryani., & Y. Suryani. Journal of Biological Sciences Short Communication. 7(1) (2014) [Google Scholar]
  10. H. Sulistyani., M. Fujita., H. Miyakawa., & F. Nakazawa. Asian Pacific journal of tropical medicine. 9(2) (2016) [Google Scholar]
  11. G. Gayathry. International Journal of Food and Fermentation Technology. 5(2) (2015) [Google Scholar]
  12. L. Lusi., P. Periadnadi., & N. Nurmiati. Journal of Biological Sciences. 4(1) (2017) [Google Scholar]
  13. H. X. Phong., L.T. Lin., N.N. Thanh., B.H.D. Long., & N.T.P. Dung. American Journal of food and Science and Nutrition. 4(1) (2017) [Google Scholar]
  14. B. Santosa., R. Rozana., & A. Astutik. 12(1) (2021) [Google Scholar]
  15. BPTP DKI Jakarta. Leaflet Utilization of Moringa leaves for making cendol and steamed cake (2019) [Google Scholar]
  16. P. Layuk, M. Lintang & G.H. Joseph. The effect of Coconut Water Fermentation Time on the production and quality of nata de coco Buletin. 13(1) (2016) [Google Scholar]
  17. B.V. McCleary.Modification to AOAC official methods 2009.01 and 2011.25 to allow for minor overestimation of low molecular weight soluble dietary fiber in samples containing starch. Journal of AOAC International. 97(3) (2014) [Google Scholar]
  18. B. Kartika, H. Pudji & S. Wahyu. Food Sensory Test Guidelines (1988) [Google Scholar]
  19. K.A. Hanafiah.Experimental Design (Theory and Application). Rajawali Press (2012) [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Kumalaningsih. Metodologi Penelitian: Kupas Tuntas Cara Mencapai Tujuan. UB Press (2012) [Google Scholar]
  21. L. Sutarminingsih. Nata de Coco Business Opportunity. Kasinus (2004) [Google Scholar]
  22. Y.M. Liana, M. Muis & A.R. Arirong. Utilization of organic nitrogen sources in the manufacture of nata de coco. Journal of Agrisystem, 3(2) (2007) [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Patria, M. Muzaifa & Z. Zurrahmah.Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Technology and Industry. 5(3) (2013) [Google Scholar]
  24. L. Putriana., S. Aminah. Physical Quality, Fiber Content and Organoleptic Properties of Nata de Cassava Based on Fermentation Duration.Journal of Food and Nutrition. 4(1) (2013) [Google Scholar]
  25. R. Naufalin & Wibowo. Effect of the addition of sucrose and sprout extract on the quality of nata de cassava. Journal of Rural Development. 3(3) (2003) [Google Scholar]
  26. M. Fifendy, D.H. Putri & S.S. Maria.Effect of the addition of bean sprouts as a source of nitrogen on the quality of nata de coco. Journal of Science and Technology. 3(2). (2011) [Google Scholar]
  27. F.G. Winarno.Food Chemistry and Nutrition. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama (2012) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.