Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 362, 2022
BuildSim Nordic 2022
Article Number 01004
Number of page(s) 9
Section Daylighting in Simulation
Published online 01 December 2022
  1. Aries, M. B. C., Veitch, J. A., & Newsham, G. R. (2010). Windows, view, and office characteristics predict physical and psychological discomfort. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 533–541. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bournas, I. (2020). Daylight compliance of residential spaces: Comparison of different performance criteria and association with room geometry and urban density. Building and Environment, 185, 107276. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Building Research Establishment. (2021). BREEAM International New Construction Version 6.0. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cole, R. J. (2012). Regenerative design and development: current theory and practice. Building Research & Information, 40(1), 1–6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Commission Internationale de l Eclairage (CIE). (2009). Ocular lighting effects on human physiology and behaviour. CIE, 2004/2009, ISBNCIE 158:2009. [Google Scholar]
  6. de Luca, F., Dogan, T., & Sepúlveda, A. (2021). Reverse solar envelope method. A new building formfinding method that can take regulatory frameworks into account. Automation in Construction, 123, 103518. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. European Committee for Standardization. (2022). Daylight in buildings. (EN 17037). http://Store.Uni.Com/Catalogo/Uni-En-17037-2022. [Google Scholar]
  8. IESNA-Daylight Metrics Committee. (2013). Lighting measurement #83: Spatial Daylight Autonomy (sDA) and Annual Sunlight Exposure (ASE). Illuminating Engineering Society. [Google Scholar]
  9. IWBI. (2022). WELL Building Standard v2. [Google Scholar]
  10. Klepeis, N. E., Nelson, W. C., Ott, W. R., Robinson, J. P., Tsang, A. M., Switzer, P., Behar, J.V., Hern, S.C., & Engelmann, W.H. (2001). The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 11(3), 231–252. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ko, W. H., Kent, M. G., Schiavon, S., Levitt, B., & Betti, G. (2021). A Window View Quality Assessment Framework. LEUKOS, 0(0), 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ladybug Tools (1.4.0). (2022). [Google Scholar]
  13. Love, J. A. (1992). The evolution of performance indicators for the evaluation of daylighting systems. Conference Record of the 1992 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting, 1992-January, 1830–1836. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mang, P., & Reed, B. (2013). Regenerative Development regenerative development and Design. In Sustainable Built Environments (pp. 478–501). Springer New York. [Google Scholar]
  15. Mardaljevic, J., & Christoffersen, J. (2017). ‘Climate connectivity’ in the daylight factor basis of building standards. Building and Environment, 113, 200–209. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nabil, A., & Mardaljevic, J. (2006). Useful daylight illuminances: A replacement for daylight factors. Energy and Buildings, 38(7), 905–913. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Naboni, E., & Havinga, L. (2019). Regenerative Design In Digital Practice. A Handbook for the Built Environment. [Google Scholar]
  18. Reinhart, C. (2018). Daylighting Handbook II. [Google Scholar]
  19. Reinhart, C. F., & Weissman, D. A. (2012). The daylit area - Correlating architectural student assessments with current and emerging daylight availability metrics. Building and Environment, 50, 155–164. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Robert McNeel & Associates. (2020). Rhinoceros 3D (Version 7.15). [Google Scholar]
  21. Sadeghipour Roudsari, M., & Pak, M. (2013). Ladybug: A parametric environmental plugin for grasshopper to help designers create an environmentally- conscious design. Proceedings of BS 2013: 13th Conference of the International Building Performance Simulation Association, 3128–3135. [Google Scholar]
  22. Šprah, N., & Košir, M. (2020). Daylight provision requirements according to EN 17037 as a restriction for sustainable urban planning of residential developments. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(1). [Google Scholar]
  23. Turan, I., Chegut, A., Fink, D., & Reinhart, C. (2021). Development of view potential metrics and the financial impact of views on office rents. Landscape and Urban Planning, 215. [Google Scholar]
  24. Turan, I., Reinhart, C., & Kocher, M. (2020). A New Framework for Evaluating Views throughout Open Plan Work Spaces. Proceedings of Building Simulation 2019: 16th Conference of IBPSA, 16, 1098–1105. [Google Scholar]
  25. U.S. Green Building Council. (2021). LEED v4.1 for building design and construction. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.