Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 363, 2022
XV International Scientific Conference on Precision Agriculture and Agricultural Machinery Industry “State and Prospects for the Development of Agribusiness - INTERAGROMASH 2022”
Article Number 02003
Number of page(s) 8
Section Precision Farming Software. Agroecology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202236302003
Published online 14 December 2022
  1. L. Bjerrum, Allowable settlement of structures. Proceedings of the European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Wiesbaden, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Erd und Grundbau (1963). [Google Scholar]
  2. S.J. Boone, J. of Geotech. and Environm. Eng. 122(11), 886–896 (1996). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. M.D. Boscardin, E.J. Cording, J. of Geotech. Eng. 115(1), 1–21 (1989). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. J.B. Burland, C.P. Wroth, Settlement of buildings and associated damage. SOA review, Conference on settlement of structures (Cambridge, 1974). [Google Scholar]
  5. J.B. Burland, B.B. Broms, V.F.B. De Mello, Behaviour of Foundations and Structures. Ninth International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 495–546 (1977). [Google Scholar]
  6. R. Grant, J.T. Christian, E.H. Vanmarcke, J. of Geotech. Eng. Division 100(GT 9), 973–991 (1974). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. G.G. Meyerhof, 1953. Some recent foundation research and its application to design. The structural Engineer 31(June), pp. 151–167 (1953). [Google Scholar]
  8. D.E. Polshin, R.A. Tokar, Maximum allowable non-uniform settlement of structures. Proceedings 4th Int. Conference On Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. London, UK, vol.1, Butterworth’s scientific (1957). [Google Scholar]
  9. W.J. Rankin, 1988. Eng. Geology Special publication, Geological Society 5, 79–92 (1988). [Google Scholar]
  10. A.G. Shashkin, et al., Аnalysis of causes of deformations in historic buildings on weak clay soils, Geotechnics Fundamentals and Applications in Construction: New Materials, Structures, Technologies and Calculations. Proceedings of the International Conference on Geotechnics Fundamentals and Applications in Construction: New Materials, Structures, Technologies and Calculations «GFAC 2019». Saint-Petersburg. Vol. 2. pp. 329–334, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  11. A.W. Skempton, D.H. McDonald, Proceedings Institution of Civil Engineers part III 5(50), 727–768 (1956). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. V.M. Ulitsky, et al., Soil-structure interaction effects. In: Geotechnical Engineering for Infrastructure and Development, Proceedings of the XVI European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, ECSMGE 2015 16, Geotechnical Engineering for Infrastructure and Development, pp. 4191–4196. (2015) [Google Scholar]
  13. V.A. Vasenin, Soil Mechanics and Foundation Eng. 4, 2–7 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  14. H.E. Wahls, ASCE, J. of Geotechnical Eng. Division 107(GT 11), 1489–1505 (1981). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. V.M. Ulitsky, A.G. Shashkin, Geotechnical support for urban reconstruction (M.: Ed. ACB, 1999). [Google Scholar]
  16. P. Popielski, A. Dombska, V.N. Paramonov, Urban development and geotechnical construction. 14, 215–226 (2012). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.